Skip to main content

Full text of "The Games People Play"

Eric Berne 

Games People Play 

The psychology of human relationships 

Table of contents 






CHAPTER ONE Structural Analysis 8 

CHAPTER TWO Transactional Analysis 10 

CHAPTER THREE Procedures and Rituals 14 

CHAPTER FOUR Pastimes 16 








Introduction 28 



CHAPTER SIX Life Games 30 


2 DEBTOR 33 

3 KICK ME 34 



CHAPTER SEVEN Marital Game 39 

1 CORNER 39 







CHAPTER EIGHT Party Games 47 





CHAPTER NINE Sexual Games 54 



3RAPO 55 


5 UPROAR 57 

CHAPTER TEN Underworld Games 59 




CHAPTER ELEVEN Consulting Room Games 63 






6 STUPID 70 













CHAPTER SEVENTEEN The Attainment of Autonomy 80 

CHAPTER EIGHTEEN After Games, What? 81 


The Classification of Behavior 81 


THIS book is primarily designed to be a sequel to my book Transnational Analysis in 
Psychotherapy, 1 but has been planned so that it can be read and understood independently. The 
theory necessary for the analysis and clear understanding of games has been summarized in Part I. 
Part II contains descriptions of the individual games. Part III contains new clinical and theoretical 
material which, added to the old, makes it possible to understand to some extent what it means to 
be game-free. Those desiring further background are referred to the earlier volume. The reader of 
both will note that in addition to the theoretical advances, there have been some minor changes in 
terminology and viewpoint based on further thinking and reading and new clinical material. 
The need for this book was indicated by interested requests from students and lecture audiences for 
lists of games, or for further elaboration of games mentioned briefly as examples in a general 
exposition of the principles of transactional analysis. Thanks are due in general to these students 
and audiences, and especially to the many patients who exposed to view, spotted or named new 
games; and in particular to Miss Barbara Rosenfeld for her many ideas about the art and meaning 
of listening; and to Mr. Melvin Boyce, Mr. Joseph Concannon, Dr. Franklin Ernst, Dr. Kenneth 
Everts, Dr. Gordon Gritter, Mrs. Frances Matson, and Dr. Ray Poindexter, among others, for their 
independent discovery or confirmation of the significance of many games. 
Mr. Claude Steiner, formerly Research Director of the San Francisco Social Psychiatry Seminars 
and presently in the Department of Psychology at the University of Michigan deserves special 
mention on two counts. He conducted the first experiments which confirmed many of the 
theoretical points at issue here, and as a result of these experiments he helped considerably in 
clarifying the nature of autonomy and of intimacy. Thanks are also due to Miss Viola Lilt, the 
Secretary-Treasurer of the Seminars, and to Mrs. Mary N. Williams, my personal secretary, for 
their continued help, and to Anne Garrett for her assistance in reading the proof. 


For conciseness, the games are described primarily from the male point of view unless they are 
clearly feminine. Thus the chief player is usually designated as "he," but without prejudice, since 
the same situation, unless otherwise indicated, could as easily be outlined with "she," mutatis 
mutandis. If the woman's role differs significantly from the man's, it is treated separately. The 
therapist is similarly without prejudice designated as "he." The vocabulary and viewpoint are 
primarily oriented toward the practicing clinician, but members of other professions may find this 
book interesting or useful. 

Transactional game analysis should be clearly distinguished from its growing sister science of 
mathematical game analysis, although a few of the terms used in the text, such as "payoff," are now 
respectably mathematical. For a detailed review of the mathematical theory of games see Games & 
Decisions, by R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa 
— Carmel, California, May 1962 


1. Berne, E. Transnational Analysis in Psychotherapy. Grove Press, Inc., New York, 1961. 

2. Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H. Games & Decisions. John Willey & Sons, Inc., New York, 1957. 



THE theory of social intercourse, which has been outlined at some length in Transnational Analysis 
may be summarized as follows. 

Spitz has found that infants deprived of handling over a long period will tend at length to sink into 
an irreversible decline and are prone to succumb eventually to intercurrent disease. In effect, this 
means that what he calls emotional deprivation can have a fatal outcome. These observations give 
rise to the idea of stimulus-hunger, and indicate that the most favored forms of stimuli are those 
provided by physical intimacy, a conclusion not hard to accept on the basis of everyday experience. 
An allied phenomenon is seen in grown-ups subjected to sensory deprivation. Experimentally, such 
deprivation may call forth a transient psychosis, or at least give rise to temporary mental 
disturbances. In the past, social and sensory deprivation is noted to have had similar effects in 
individuals condemned to long periods of solitary imprisonment. Indeed, solitary confinement is 
one of the punishments most dreaded even by prisoners hardened to physical brutality, and is now a 
notorious procedure for inducing political compliance. (Conversely, the best of the known weapons 
against compliance is social organization.) 

On that biological side, it is probable that emotional and sensory deprivation tends to bring about or 
encourage organic changes. If the reticular activating system8 of the brain stem is not sufficiently 
stimulated, degenerative changes in the nerve cells may follow, at least indirectly. This may be a 
secondary effect due to poor nutrition, but the poor nutrition itself may be a product of apathy, as in 
infants suffering from marasmus. Hence a biological chain may he postulated leading from 
emotional and sensory deprivation through apathy to degenerative changes and death. In this sense, 
stimulus-hunger has the same relationship to survival of the human organism as food-hunger. 
Indeed, not only biologically but also psychologically and socially, stimulus-hunger in many ways 
parallels the hunger for food. Such terms as malnutrition, satiation, gourmet, gourmand, faddist, 
ascetic, culinary arts, and good cook are easily transferred from the field of nutrition to the field of 
sensation. Overstuffing has its parallel in overstimulation. In both spheres, under ordinary 
conditions where ample supplies are available and a diversified menu is possible, choices will be 
heavily influenced by an individual's idiosyncrasies. It is possible that some or many of these 
idiosyncrasies are constitutionally determined, but this is irrelevant to the problems at issue here. 
The social psychiatrist's concern in the matter is with what happens after the infant is separated 
from his mother, in the normal course of growth. What has been said so far may be summarized by 
the "colloquialism": 7 "If you are not stroked, your spinal cord will shrivel up." Hence, after the 
period of close intimacy with the mother is over, the individual for the rest of his life is confronted 
with a dilemma upon whose horns his destiny and survival are continually being tossed. One born 
is the social, psychological and biological forces which stand in the way of continued physical 
intimacy in the infant style; the other is his perpetual striving for its attainment. Under most 
conditions he will compromise. He learns to do with more subtle, even symbolic, forms of handling, 
until the merest nod of recognition may serve the purpose to some extent, although his original 
craving for physical contact may remain unabated. 

This process of compromise may be called by various terms, such as sublimation; but whatever it is 
called, the result is a partial transformation of the infantile stimulus-hunger into something which 
may be termed recognition-hunger. As the complexities of compromise increase, each person 
becomes more and more individual in his quest for recognition, and it is these differentia which 
lend variety to social intercourse and which determine the individual's destiny. A movie actor may 
require hundreds of strokes each week from anonymous and undifferentiated admirers to keep his 
spinal cord from shriveling, while a scientist may keep physically and mentally healthy on one 
stroke a year from a respected master. 

"Stroking" may be used as a general term for intimate physical contact; in practice it may take 
various forms. Some people literally stroke an infant; others hug or pat it, while some people pinch 

it playfully or flip it with a fingertip. These all have their analogues in conversation, so that it seems 
one might predict how an individual would handle a baby by listening to him talk. By an extension 
of meaning, "stroking" may be employed colloquially to denote any act implying recognition of 
another's presence. Hence a stroke may be used as the fundamental unit of social action. An 
exchange of strokes constitutes a transaction, which is the unit of social intercourse. 
As far as the theory of games is concerned, the principle which emerges here is that any social 
intercourse whatever has a biological advantage over no intercourse at all. This has been 
experimentally demonstrated in the case of rats through some remarkable experiments by S. Levine 
8 in which not only physical, mental and emotional development but also the biochemistry of the 
brain and even resistance to leukemia were favorably affected by handling. The significant feature 
of these experiments was that gentle handling and painful electric shocks were equally effective in 
promoting the health of the animals. 

This validation of what has been said above encourages us to proceed with increased confidence to 
the next section. 


Granted that handling of infants, and its symbolic equivalent in grown-ups, recognition, have a 
survival value. The question is, What next? In everyday terms, what can people do after they have 
exchanged greetings, whether the greeting consists of a collegiate "Hi!" or an Oriental ritual lasting 
several hours? After stimulus-hunger and recognition-hunger comes structure-hunger. The 
perennial problem of adolescents is: "What do you say to her (him) then?" And to many people 
besides adolescents, nothing is more uncomfortable than a social hiatus, a period of silent, 
unstructured time when no one present can think of anything more interesting to say than; "Don't 
you think the walls are perpendicular tonight?" The eternal problem of the human being is how to 
structure his waking hours. In this existential sense, the function of all social living is to lend 
mutual assistance for this project. 

The operational aspect of time -structuring may be called programming. In has three aspects: 
material, social and individual. The most common, convenient, comfortable, and utilitarian method 
of structuring time is by a project designed to deal with the material of external reality: what is 
commonly known as work. Such a project is technically called an activity; the term "work" is 
unsuitable because a general theory of social psychiatry must recognize that social intercourse is 
also a form of work. 

Material programming arises from the vicissitudes encountered in dealing with external reality; it is 
of interest here only insofar as activities offer a matrix for "stroking," recognition, and other more 
complex forms of social intercourse. Material programming is not primarily a social problem; in 
essence it is based on data processing. The activity of building a boat relies on a long series of 
measurements and probability estimates, and any social exchange which occurs must be 
subordinated to these in order for the building to proceed. 

Social programming results in traditional ritualistic or semi-ritualistic interchanges. The chief 
criterion for it is local acceptability, popularity called "good manners." Parents in all parts of the 
world teach their children manners, which means that they know the proper greeting, eating, 
courting and mourning rituals, and also how to carry on topical conversations with appropriate 
strictures and reinforcements. The strictures and reinforcements constitute tact or diplomacy, some 
of which is universal and some local. Belching at meals or asking after another man's wife are each 
encouraged or forbidden by local ancestral tradition, and indeed there is a high degree of inverse 
correlation between these particular transactions. Usually in localities where people belch at meals, 
it is unwise to ask after the womenfolk; and in localities where people are asking after the 
womenfolk, it is unwise to belch at meals. Usually formal rituals precede semi-ritualistic topical 
conversations, and the latter may be distinguished by calling them -pastimes. 
As people become better acquainted, more and more individual programming creeps in, so that 
"incidents" begin to occur. These incidents superficially appear to be adventitious, and may be so 
described by the parties concerned, but careful scrutiny reveals that they tend to follow definite 

patterns which are amenable to sorting and classification, and that the sequence is circumscribed by 
unspoken rules and regulations. These regulations remain latent as long as the amities or hostilities 
proceed according to Hoyle, but they become manifest if an illegal move is made, giving rise to a 
symbolic, verbal or legal cry of "Foul!" Such sequences, which in contrast to pastimes are based 
more on individual than on social programming, may be called games. Family life and married life, 
as well as life in organizations of various kinds, may year after year be based on variations of the 
same game. 

To say that the bulk of social activity consists of playing games does not necessarily mean that it is 
mostly "fun" or that the parties are not seriously engaged in the relationship. On the one hand, 
"playing" football and other athletic "games" may not be fun at all, and the players may be 
intensely grim; and such games share with gambling and other forms of "play" the potentiality for 
being very serious indeed, sometimes fatal. On the other hand, some authors, for instance Huizinga, 
9 include under "play" such serious things as cannibal feasts. Hence calling such tragic behavior as 
suicide, alcohol and drug addiction, criminality or schizophrenia "playing games" is not 
irresponsible, facetious or barbaric. The essential characteristic of human play is not that the 
emotions are spurious, but that they are regulated. This is revealed when sanctions are imposed on 
an illegitimate emotional display. Play may be grimly serious, or even fatally serious, but the social 
sanctions are serious only if the rules are broken. 

Pastimes and games are substitutes for the real living of real intimacy. Because of this they may be 
regarded as preliminary engagements rather than as unions, which is why they are characterized as 
poignant forms of play. Intimacy begins when individual (usually instinctual) programming 
becomes more intense, and both social patterning and ulterior restrictions and motives begin to give 
way. It is the only completely satisfying answer to stimulus-hunger, recognition-hunger and 
structure-hunger. Its prototype is the act of loving impregnation. 

Structure-hunger has the same survival value as stimulus-hunger. Stimulus-hunger and recognition- 
hunger express the need to avoid sensory and emotional starvation, both of which lead to biological 
deterioration. Structure-hunger expresses the need to avoid boredom, and KierkegaardlO has 
pointed out the evils which result from unstructured time. If it persists for any length of time, 
boredom becomes synonymous with emotional starvation and can have the same consequences. 
The solitary individual can structure time in two ways: activity and fantasy. An individual can 
remain solitary even in the presence of others, as every schoolteacher knows. When one is a 
member of a social aggregation of two or more people, there are several options for structuring 
time. In order of complexity, these are: (1) Rituals (2) Pastimes (3) Games (4) Intimacy and (5) 
Activity, which may form a matrix for any of the others. The goal of each member of the 
aggregation is to obtain as many satisfactions as possible from his transactions with other members. 
The more accessible he is, the more satisfactions he can obtain. Most of the programming of his 
social operations is automatic. Since some of the "satisfactions" obtained under this programming, 
such as self-destructive ones, are difficult to recognize in the usual sense of the word 
"satisfactions," it would be better to substitute some more non-committal terra, such as "gains" or 

The advantages of social contact revolve around somatic and psychic equilibrium. They are related 
to the following factors: (1) the relief of tension (2) the avoidance of noxious situations (3) the 
procurement of stroking and (4) the maintenance of an established equilibrium. All these items 
have been investigated and discussed in great detail by physiologists, psychologists, and 
psychoanalysts. Translated into terms of social psychiatry, they may be stated as (1) the primary 
internal advantages (2) the primary external advantages (3) the secondary advantages and (4) the 
existential advantages. The first three parallel the "gains from illness" described by Freud: the 
internal paranosic gain, the external paranosic gain, and the eplnosic gain, 
Experience has shown that it is more useful and enlightening to investigate social transactions from 
the point of view of the advantages gained than to treat them as defensive operations. In the first 
place, the best defense is to engage in no transactions at all; in the second place, the concept of 

"defenses" covers only part of the first two classes of advantages, and the rest of them, together 
with the third and fourth classes, are lost to this point of view. 

The most gratifying forms of social contact, whether or not they are embedded in a matrix of 
activity, are games and intimacy. Prolonged intimacy is rare, and even then it is primarily a private 
matter; significant social intercourse most commonly takes the form of games, and that is the 
subject which principally concerns us here. For further information about rime-structuring, the 
author's book on group dynamics should be consulted. 


1. Berne, E. Transnational Analysis in Psychotherapy, Grove Press, Inc., New York, 1961. 

2. Spitz, R. "Hospitalism: Genesis of Psychiatric Conditions in Early Childhood." Psychoanalytic 
Study of the Child. 1: 53-74, 1945. 

3. Belbenoit, Rene. Dry Guillotine. E. P. Dutton & Company, New York, 1938. 

4. Seaton, G. J. Isle of the Damned. Popular Library, New York, 1952. 

5. Kinkead, E. In Every War But One. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1959. 

6. French, J. D. "The Reticular Formation." Scientific American. 196: 54-60, May, 1957. 

7. The "colloquialisms" used are those evolved in the course of time at the San Francisco Social 
Psychiatry Seminars. 

8. Levine, S. 'Stimulation in Infancy." Scientific American. 202: 80-86, May, 1960. 

. "Infantile Experience and Resistance to Physiological Stress." Science. 126: 405, 

August 30, 1957. 

9. Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens, Beacon Press, Boston, 1955. 

10. Kierkegaard, S. A Kierkegaard Anthology, ed. R. Bretall. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 
1947, pp. 22 ff. 

11. Freud, S. "General Remarks on Hysterical Attacks." Collected Papers, Hogarth Press, London, 
1933, II, p. 102. 

. "Analysis of a Case of Hysteria." Ibid. Ill, p. 54. 

12. Berne, E. The Structure and Dynamics of Organizations and Groups. J. B. Lippincott Company, 
Philadelphia and Montreal, 1963. (See especially Chapters 11 and 120 


Analysis of Games 

Structural Analysis 

OBSERVATION of spontaneous social activity, most productively carried out in certain kinds of 
psychotherapy groups, reveals that from time to time people show noticeable changes in posture, 
viewpoint, voice, vocabulary, and other aspects of behavior. These behavioral changes are often 
accompanied by shifts in feeling. In given individual, a certain patterns correspond to one state of 
mind, while another set is related to a different psychic attitude, often inconsistent with the first. 
These changes and differences give rise to the idea of "ego states". 

In technical language, an ego state may be described phenomenologically as a coherent system of 
feelings, and operationally as a set of coherent behavior patterns. In more practical terms, it is a 
system of feelings accompanied by a related set of behavior patterns. Each individual seems to have 
available a limited repertoire of such ego states, which are not roles but psychological realities. 
This repertoire can be sorted into the following categories: CO ego states which resemble those of 
parental figures (2) ego states which are autonomously directed toward objective appraisal of 
reality and (B) those which represent archaic relics, still-active ego states which were fixated in 
early childhood. Technically these are called, respectively, extero-psychic, neopsychic, and 
archaeopsychic ego states. Colloquially their exhibitions are called Parent, Adult and Child, and 
these simple terms serve for all but the most formal discussions. 

The position is, then, that at any given moment each individual in a social aggregation will exhibit 
a Parental, Adult or Child ego state, and that individuals can shift with varying degrees of readiness 
from one ego state to another. These observations give rise to certain diagnostic statements. "That 
is your Parent" means: "You are now in the same state of mind as one of your parents (or a parental 
substitute) used to be, and you are responding as he would, with the same posture, gestures, 
vocabulary, feelings, etc." "That is your Adult" means: "You have just made an autonomous, 
objective appraisal of the situation and are stating these thought-processes, or the problems you 
perceive, or the conclusions you have come to, in a non-prejudicial manner." "That is your Child" 
means: "The manner and intent of your reaction is the same as it would have been when you were a 
very little boy or girl." The implications are: 

1. That every individual has had parents (or substitute parents) and that he carries within him a set 
of ego states that reproduce the ego states of those parents (as he perceived them), and that these 
parental ego states can be activated under certain circumstances (exteropsychic functioning). 
Colloquially: "Everyone carries his parents around inside of him." 

2. That every individual (including children, the mentally retarded and schizophrenics) is capable 
of objective data processing if the appropriate ego state can be activated (neopsychic functioning). 
Colloquially: "Everyone has an Adult." 

3. That every individual was once younger than he is now, and that he carries within him fixated 
relics from earlier years which will be activated under certain circumstances (archaeopsychic 
functioning). Colloquially: "Everyone carries a little boy or girl around inside of him." 

At this point it is appropriate to draw Figure I (A), which is called a structural diagram. This 
represents, from the present viewpoint, a diagram of the complete personality of any individual. It 
includes his Parental, Adult, and Child ego states. They are carefully segregated from each other, 
because they are so different and because they are so often quite inconsistent with each other. The 
distinctions may not be clear at first to an inexperienced observer, but soon become impressive and 
interesting to anyone who takes the trouble to learn structural diagnosis. It will be convenient 
henceforth to call actual people parents, adults or children, with no capital letters; Parent, Adult and 
Child, capitalized, will be used when ego states are referred to. Figure 1(B) represents a convenient, 
simplified form of the structural diagram. 


A Structural 


< FIGURE 1 > 

Before we leave the subject of structural analysis, certain complications should be mentioned. 

1. The word "childish" is never used in structural analysis, since it has come to have strong 
connotations of undesirability, and of something to be stopped forthwith or gotten rid of. The term 
"childlike" is used in describing the Child (an archaic ego state), since it is more biological and not 
prejudicial. Actually the Child is in many ways the most valuable part of the personality, and can 
contribute to the individual's life exactly what an actual child can contribute to family life: charm, 
pleasure and creativity. If the Child in the individual is confused and unhealthy, then the 
consequences may be unfortunate, but something can and should be done about it. 

2. The same applies to the words "mature" and "immature." In this system there is no such thing as 
an "immature person." There are only people in whom the Child takes over inappropriately or 
unproductively, but all such people have a complete, well-structured Adult which only needs to be 
uncovered or activated. Conversely, so-called "mature people" are people who are able to keep the 
Adult in control most of the time, but their Child will take over on occasion like anyone else's, 
often with disconcerting results. 

3. It should be noted that the Parent is exhibited in two forms, direct and indirect: as an active ego 
state, and as an influence. When it is directly active, the person responds as his own father (or 
mother) actually responded ("Do as I do"). When it is an indirect influence, he responds the way 
they wanted him to respond ("Don't do as I do, do as I say"). In the first case he becomes one of 
them; in the second, he adapts himself to their requirements. 

4. Thus the Child is also exhibited in two forms: the adapted Child and the natural Child. The 
adapted Child is the one who modifies his behavior under the Parental influence. He behaves as 
father (or mother) wanted him to behave: compliantly or precociously, for example. Or he adapts 
himself by withdrawing or whining. Thus the Parental influence is a cause, and the adapted Child 
an effect. The natural Child is a spontaneous expression: rebellion or creativity, for example. A 
confirmation of structural analysis is seen in the results of alcohol intoxication. Usually this 
decommissions the Parent first, so that the adapted Child is freed of the Parental influence, and is 
transformed by release into the natural Child. 

It is seldom necessary, for effective game analysis, to go beyond what has been outlined above as 
far as personality structure is concerned. 

Ego states are normal physiological phenomena. The human brain is the organ or organizer of 
psychic life, and its products ate organized and stored in the form of ego states. There is already 
concrete evidence for this in some findings of Penfield and his associates. 1-2 There are other 
sorting systems at various levels, such as factual memory, but the natural form of experience itself 
is in shifting states of mind. Each type of ego state has its own vital value for the human organism. 

In the Child reside intuition,3 creativity and spontaneous drive and enjoyment. 
The Adult is necessary for survival. It processes data and computes the probabilities which are 
essential for dealing effectively with the outside world. It also experiences its own kinds of 
setbacks and gratifications. Crossing a busy highway, for example, requires the processing of a 
complex series of velocity data; action is suspended until the computations indicate a high degree 
of probability for reaching the other side safely. The gratifications offered by successful 
computations of this type afford some of the joys of skiing, flying, sailing, and other mobile sports. 
Another task of the Adult is to regulate the activities of the Parent and the Child, and to mediate 
objectively between them. 

The Parent has two main functions. First, it enables the individual to act effectively as the parent of 
actual children, thus promoting the survival of the human race. Its value in this respect is shown by 
the fact that in raising children, people orphaned in infancy seem to have a harder time than those 
from homes unbroken into adolescence. Secondly, it makes many responses automatic, which 
conserves a great deal of time and energy. Many things are done because "That's the way it's done." 
This frees the Adult from the necessity of making innumerable trivial decisions, so that it can 
devote itself to more important issues, leaving routine matters to the Parent. Thus all three aspects 
of the personality have a high survival and living value, and it is only when one or the other of 
them disturbs the healthy balance that analysis and reorganization are indicated. Otherwise, each of 
them, Parent, Adult, and Child, have right to be respected. Each has legitimate place in a full and 
productive life. 


1. Penfield, W. "Memory Mechanisms." Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry. 67: 178-198, 1952. 

2. Penfield, W. & Jasper, H. E-pilepsy and the functional Anatomy of the Human Brain, Little, 
Brown & Company, Boston, 1954. Chap. XL 

3. Berne, E. "The Psychodynamics of Intuition." Psychiatric Quarterly. 36: 294-300,' 1962. 

Transactional Analysis 

THE unit of social intercourse is called a transaction. If two or more people encounter each other in 
a social aggregation, sooner or later one of them will speak, or give some other indication of 
acknowledging the presence of the others. This is called the transactional stimulus. Another person 
will then say or do something which is in some way related to this stimulus, and that is called the 
transactions/ response. Simple transactional analysis is concerned with diagnosing which ego state 
implemented the transactional stimulus, and which one executed the transactional response. The 
simplest transactions are those in which both stimulus and response arise from the Adults of the 
parties concerned. The agent, estimating from the data before him that a scalpel is now the 
instrument of choice, holds out his hand. The respondent appraises this gesture correctly, estimates 
the forces and distances involved, and places the handle of the scalpel exactiy where the surgeon 
expects it. Next in simplicity are Child-Parent transactions. The fevered Child asks for a glass of 
water, and the nurturing mother brings it. 

Both these transactions are complementary; that is, the response is appropriate and expected and 
follows the natural order of healthy human relationships. The first, which is classified as 
Complementary Transaction Type I, is represented in Figure 2A. The second, Complementary 
Transaction Type II, is shown in Figure 2B. It is evident, however, that transactions tend to proceed 
in chains, so that each response is in mm a stimulus. The first rule of communication is that 
communication will proceed smoothly as long as transactions are complementary, and its corollary 
is that as long as transactions are complementary, communication can, in principle, proceed 
indefinitely. These rules are independent of the nature and content of the transactions; they are 
based entirely on the direction of the vectors involved. As long as the transactions are 


complementary, it is irrelevant to the rule whether two people are engaging in critical gossip 
(Parent-Parent), solving a problem (Adult- Adult), or playing together (Child-Child or Parent-Child). 


Child \ / Child 






Type 2 

< FIGURE 2 > Complementary Transactions 

The converse rule is that communication is broken off when a crossed transaction occurs. The most 
common crossed transaction and the one which causes and always has caused most of the social 
difficulties in the world, whether in marriage, love, friendship, or work is represented in Figure 3A 
as Crossed Transaction Type I. This type of transaction is the principal concern of psychotherapists 
and is typified by the classical transference reaction of psychoanalysis. The stimulus is Adult-Adult: 
e.g., "Maybe we should find out why you've been drinking more lately," or, "Do you know where 
my cuff links are?" The appropriate Adult-Adult response in each case would be: "Maybe we 
should. I'd certainly like to know!" or, "On the desk." If the respondent flares up, however, the 
responses will be something like "You're always criticizing me, just like my father did," or, "You 
always blame me for everything." These are both Child-Parent responses, and as the transactional 
diagram shows, the vectors cross. In such cases the Adult problems about drinking or cuff links 
must be suspended until the vectors can be realigned. This may take anywhere from several months 
in the drinking example to a few seconds in the case of cuff links. Either the agent must become 
Parental as a complement to the respondent's suddenly activated Child, or the respondent's Adult 
must be reactivated as a complement to the agent's Adult. If the maid rebels during a discussion of 
dishwashing, the Adult- Adult conversation about dishes is finished; there can only ensue either a 
Child-Parent discourse, or a discussion of a different Adult subject, namely her continued 


Agent Respondent 

< FIGURE 3 > Crossed transactions 

Agent Respondent 

Type 2 

< FIGURE 4 > A Relationship Diagram 


The converse of Crossed Transaction Type I is illustrated in Figure 3B. This is the counter- 
transference reaction familiar to psychotherapists, in which the patient makes an objective, Adult 
observation, and the therapist crosses the vectors by responding like a parent talking to a child. This 
is Crossed Transaction Type II. In everyday life, "Do you know where my cuff links are?" may 
elicit: "Why don't you keep track of your own things? You're not a child any more." 
The relationship diagram in Figure 4, showing the nine possible vectors of social action between an 
agent and a respondent, has some interesting geometrical (topological) qualities. Complementary 
transactions between "psychological equals" are represented by (1 — I) 2 , (5 — 5) 2 and (9 — 9) 2 . There 
are three other complementary transactions: (2-4) (4-2), (3-7) (7-3) and (6-8) (8-6). All other 
combinations form crossed transactions, and in most cases these show up as crossings in the 
diagram: e.g., (3 — 7) (3 — 7), which results in two speechless people glaring at each other. If neither 
of them gives way, communication is finished and they must part. The most common solutions are 


for one to yield and take (7 — 3), which results in a game of "Uproar"; or better, (5 — 5) , in which 
case they both burst out laughing or shake hands. Simple complementary transactions most 
commonly occur in superficial working and social relationships, and these are easily disturbed by 
simple crossed transactions. In fact a superficial relationship may be defined as one which is 
confined to simple complementary transactions. Such relationships occur in activities, rituals and 
pastimes. More complex are ulterior transactions — those involving the activity of more than two 
ego states simultaneously — and this category is the basis for games. Salesmen are particularly adept 
at angular transactions, those involving three ego states. A crude but dramatic example of a sales 
game is illustrated in the following exchange: 
Salesman: "This one is better, but you can't afford it." 
Housewife: "That's the one I'll take. " 

The analysis of this transaction is shown in Figure 5A. The salesman, as Adult, states two objective 
facts: "This one is better" and "You can't afford it." At the ostensible, or social, level these are 
directed to the Adult of the housewife, whose Adult reply would be: "You are correct on both 
counts." However, the ulterior, or -psychological, vector is directed by the well-trained and 
experienced Adult of the salesman to the housewife's Child. The correctness of his judgment is 
demonstrated by the Child's reply, which says in effect: "Regardless of the financial consequences, 
I'll show that arrogant fellow I'm as good as any of his customers." At both levels the transaction is 
complementary, since her reply is accepted at face value as an Adult purchasing contract. 
A duplex ulterior transaction involves four ego states, and is commonly seen in flirtation games. 
Cowboy: "Come and see the barn. " 
Visitor: "I've loved barns ever since I was a little girl. " 

Social level / Adult 

■ Psychological" - 

Adult \ Social level / Adult 



Child \ Psychological 


(a) An Angular Transaction 

(b) A Duplex Transaction 

< FIGURE 5 > Ulterior Transactions 

As shown in Figure 5B, at the social level this is an Adult conversation about barns, and at the 
psychological level it is a Child conversation about sex play. On the surface the Adult seems to 
have the initiative, but as in most games, the outcome is determined by the Child, and the 
participants may be in for a surprise. 

Transactions may be classified, then, as complementary or crossed, simple or ulterior, and ulterior 
transactions may be subdivided into angular and duplex types. 


Procedures and Rituals 

TRANSACTIONS usually proceed in series. These series are not random, but are programmed. 
Programming may come from one of three sources: Parent, Adult or Child, or more generally, from 
society, material or idiosyncrasy- Since the needs of adaptation require that the Child may be 
shielded by the Parent or Adult until each social situation has been tested, Child programming is 
most apt to occur in situations of privacy and intimacy, where preliminary testing has already been 

The simplest forms of social activity are procedures and rituals. Some of these are universal and 
some local, but all of them have to be learned. A -procedure is a series of simple complementary 
Adult transactions directed toward the manipulation of reality. Reality is defined as having two 
aspects: static and dynamic. Static reality comprises all the possible arrangements of matter in the 
universe. Arithmetic, for example, consists of statements about static reality. Dynamic reality may 
be defined as the potentialities for interaction of all the energy systems in the universe. Chemistry, 
for example, consists of statements about dynamic reality. Procedures are based on data processing 
and probability estimates concerning the material of reality, and reach their highest development in 
professional techniques. Piloting an airplane and removing an appendix are procedures. 
Psychotherapy is a procedure insofar as it is under the control of the therapist's Adult, and it is not a 
procedure insofar as his Parent or Child takes over the executive. The programming of a procedure 
is determined by the material, on the basis of estimates made by the agent's Adult. 
Two variables are used in evaluating procedures. A procedure is said to be efficient when the agent 
makes the best possible use of the data and experience available to him, regardless of any 
deficiencies that may exist in his knowledge. If the Parent or the Child interferes with the Adult's 
data processing, the procedure becomes contaminated and will be less efficient. The effectiveness 
of a procedure is judged by the actual results. Thus efficiency is a psychological criterion and 
effectiveness is a material one. A native assistant medical officer on a tropical island became very 
adept at removing cataracts. He used what knowledge he had with a very high degree of efficiency, 
but since he knew less than the European medical officer, he was not quite as effective. The 
European began to drink heavily so that his efficiency dropped, but at first his effectiveness was not 
diminished. But when his hands became tremulous as the years went by, his assistant began to 
surpass him not only in efficiency, but also in effectiveness. It can be seen from this example that 
both of these variables are best evaluated by an expert in the procedures involved — efficiency by 
personal acquaintance with the agent, and effectiveness by surveying the actual results. 
From the present viewpoint, a ritual is a stereotyped series of simple complementary transactions 
programmed by external social forces. An informal ritual, such as social leave-taking, may be 
subject to considerable local variations in details, although the basic form remains the same. A 
formal ritual, such as a Roman Catholic Mass, offers much less option. The form of a ritual is 
Parentally determined by tradition, but more recent "parental" influences may have similar but less 
stable effects in trivial instances. Some formal rituals of special historical or anthropological 
interest have two phases: (1) a phase in which transactions are carried on under rigid Parental 
strictures (2) a phase of Parental license, in which the Child is allowed more or less complete 
transactional freedom, resulting in an orgy. 

Many formal rituals started off as heavily contaminated though fairly efficient procedures, but as 
time passed and circumstances changed, they lost all procedural validity while still retaining their 
usefulness as acts of faith. Trans-actionally they represent guilt-relieving or reward-seeking 
compliances with traditional Parental demands. They offer a safe, reassuring (apotropaic), and 
often enjoyable method of structuring time. 

Of more significance as an introduction to game analysis are informal rituals, and among the most 
instructive are the American greeting rituals. 

1A; "Hi! " (Hello, good morning.) 
IB: "Hi!" (Hello, good morning.) 



"Warm enough forya?" (How are you?) 

"Sure is. Looks like rain, though." (Fine. How are you?) 

"Well, take cara yourself. " (Okay.) 

"I'll be seeing you. " 

"So long." 

"So long." 

It is apparent that this exchange is not intended to convey information. Indeed, if there is any 
information, it is wisely withheld. It might take Mr. A fifteen minutes to say how he is, and Mr. B, 
who is only the most casual acquaintance, has no intention of devoting that much time to listening 
to him. This series of transactions is quite adequately characterized by calling it an "eight-stroke 
ritual." If A and B were in a hurry, they might both be contented with a two-stroke exchange, Hi-Hi. 
If they were old-fashioned Oriental potentates, they might go through a two-hundred stroke ritual 
before settling down to business. Meanwhile, in the jargon of transactional analysis, A and B have 
improved each other's health slightly; for the moment, at least, "their spinal cords won't shrivel up," 
and each is accordingly grateful. 

This ritual is based on careful intuitive computations by both parties. At this stage of their 
acquaintance they figure that they owe each other exactly four strokes at each meeting, and not 
oftener than once a day. If they run into each other again shortly, say within the next half hour, and 
have no new business to transact, they will pass by without any sign, or with only the slightest nod 
of recognition, or at most with a very perfunctory Hi-Hi. These computations hold not only for 
short intervals but over periods of several months. Let us now consider Mr. C and Mr. D, who pass 
each other about once a day, trade one stroke each — Hi-Hi — and go their ways. Mr. C goes on a 
month's vacation. The day after he returns, he encounters Mr. D as usual. If on this occasion Mr. D 
merely says "Hi!" and no more, Mr. C will be offended, "his spinal cord will shrivel slightiy." By 
his calculations, Mr. D and he owe each other about thirty strokes. These can be compressed into a 
few transactions, if those transactions are emphatic enough. Mr. D's side properly runs something 
like this (where each unit of "intensity" or "interest" is equivalent to a stroke): 

ID: "Hi!"(l unit.) 

2D: "Haven't seen you around lately." (2 units.) 

3D: "Oh, have you! Where did you go?" (5 units.) 

AD: "Say, that's interesting. How was it?" (7 units.) 

5D: "Well, you're sure looking fine. " (4 units.) "Did your family go along?" (4 units.) 

6D: "Well, glad to see you back." (4 units.) 

7D: "So long." (I unit.) 

This gives Mr. D a total of 28 units. Both he and Mr. C know that he will make up the missing units 

the following day, so the account is now, for all practical purposes, squared. Two days later they 

will be back at their two-stroke exchange, Hi-Hi. But now they "know each other better," i.e., each 

knows the other is reliable, and this may be useful if they should meet "socially." 

The inverse case is also worth considering. Mr. E and Mr. F have set up a two-stroke ritual, Hi-Hi. 

One day instead of passing on, Mr. E stops and asks: "How are you?" The conversation proceeds as 


IE: "Hi!" 

IF: "Hi!' 

2E: "How are you?" 

2F (Puzzled'): "Fine. How are you?" 

3E: "Everything's great. Warm enough for you?" 

3F: "Yeah. " (Cautiously.) "Looks like rain, though. " 

4E: "Nice to see you again." 


4F: "Same here. Sorry, I've got to get to the library before it closes. So long. " 
5E: "So long." 

As Mr. F hurries away, he thinks to himself: "What's come over him all of a sudden? Is he selling 
insurance or something?" In transactional terms this reads: "All he owes me is one stroke, why is he 
giving me five?" 

An even simpler demonstration of the truly transactional business-like nature of these simple rituals 
is the occasion when Mr. G says "Hi!" and Mr. H passes on without replying. Mr. G's reaction is 
"What's the matter with him?" meaning: "I gave him a stroke and he didn't give me one in return." 
If Mr. H keeps this up and extends it to other acquaintances, he is going to cause some talk in his 

In borderline cases it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between a procedure and a ritual. The 
tendency is for the layman to call professional procedures rituals, while actually every transaction 
may be based on sound, even vital experience, but the layman does not have the background to 
appreciate that. Conversely, there is a tendency for professionals to rationalize ritualistic elements 
that still cling to their procedures, and to dismiss skeptical laymen on the ground that they are not 
equipped to understand. And one of the ways in which entrenched professionals may resist the 
introduction of sound new procedures is by laughing them off as rituals. Hence the fate of 
Semmelweis and other innovators. 

The essential and similar feature of both procedures and rituals is that they are stereotyped. Once 
the first transaction has been initiated, the whole series is predictable and follows a predetermined 
course to a foreordained conclusion unless special conditions arise. The difference between them 
lies in the origin of the predetermination: procedures are programmed by the Adult and rituals are 
Parentally patterned. 

Individuals who are not comfortable or adept with rituals sometimes evade them by substituting 
procedures. They can be found, for example, among people who like to help the hostess with 
preparing or serving food and drink at parties. 


PASTIMES occur in social and temporal matrices of varying degrees of complexity, and hence 
vary in complexity. However, if we use the transaction as the unit of social intercourse, we can 
dissect out of appropriate situations an entity which may be called a simple pastime. This may be 
defined as a series of semi-ritualistic, simple, complementary transactions arranged around a single 
field of material, whose primary object is to structure an interval of time. The beginning and end of 
the interval are typically signaled by procedures or rituals. The transactions are adaptively 
programmed so that each party will obtain the maximum gains or advantages during the interval. 
The better his adaptation, the more he will get out of it. 

Pastimes are typically played at parties ("social gatherings") or during the waiting period before a 
formal group meeting begins; such waiting periods before a meeting "begins" have the same 
structure and dynamics as "parries." Pastimes may take the form described as "chit-chat" or they 
may become more serious, e.g., argumentative. A large cocktail party often functions as a kind of 
gallery for the exhibition of pastimes. In one corner of the room a few people are playing "PTA," 
another corner is the forum for "Psychiatry," a third is the theater for "Ever Been" or "What 
Became," the fourth is engaged for "General Motors," and the buffet is reserved for women who 
want to play "Kitchen" or "Wardrobe." The proceedings at such a gathering may be almost identical, 
with a change of names here and there, with the proceedings at a dozen similar parties taking place 
simultaneously in the area. At another dozen in a different social stratum, a different assortment of 
pastimes is underway. 

Pastimes may be classified in different ways. The external determinants are sociological (sex, age, 
marital status, cultural, racial or economic). "General Motors" (comparing cars) and "Who Won" 


(sports) are both "Man Talk." "Grocery," "Kitchen," and "Wardrobe" are all "Lady Talk" —or, as 

practiced in the South Seas, "Mary Talk." "Making Out" is adolescent, while the onset of middle 

age is marked by a shift to "Balance Sheet." Other species of this class, which are all variations of 

"Small Talk," are: "How To" (go about doing something), an easy filler for short airplane trips; 

"How Much" (does it cost), a favorite in lower-middle-class bars; "Ever Been (to some nostalgic 

place), a middle-class game for "old hands" such as salesmen; "Do You Know" (so-and-so) for 

lonely ones; "What Became" (of good old Joe), often played by economic successes and failures; 

"Morning After" (what a hangover) and "Martini" (I know a better way), typical of a certain kind of 

ambitious young person. 

The structural-transactional classification is a more personal one. Thus "PTA" may be played at 

three levels. At the Child-Child level it takes the form of "How Do You Deal with Recalcitrant 

Parents"; its Adult-Adult form, "PTA" proper, is popular among well-read young mothers; with 

older people it tends to take the dogmatic Parent-Parent form of "Juvenile Delinquency." Some 

married couples play "Tell Them Dear," in which the wife is Parental and the husband comes 

through like a precocious child. "Look Ma No Hands" is similarly a Child-Parent pastime suitable 

for people of any age, sometimes diffidently adapted into "Aw Shucks Fellows." 

Even more cogent is the psychological classification of pastimes. Both "PTA" and "Psychiatry" for 

example, may be played in either projective or introjective forms. The analysis of "PTA", 

Projective Type is represented in Figure 6A, based on the following Parent-Parent paradigm: 

A: "There wouldn't be all this delinquency if it weren't for broken homes." 

B: "It's not only that. Even in good homes nowadays the children aren't taught manners the way 

they used to be. " 

"PTA," Introjective Type runs along the following lines (Adult- Adult): 

C: "I just don't seem to have what it takes to be a mother. " 

D: "No matter how hard you try, they never grow up the way you want them to, so you have to keep 

wondering if you're doing the right thing and what mistakes you've made." 

"Psychiatry" Projective Type takes the Adult-Adult form: 

E: "I think it's some unconscious oral frustration that makes him act that way. " 

F: "You seem to have your aggressions so well sublimated." 

Figure 6B represents "Psychiatry," Introjective Type, another Adult- Adult pastime. 

G: "That painting symbolizes smearing to me." 

H: "In my case, painting is trying to please my father. " 

Besides structuring time and providing mutually acceptable stroking for the parties concerned, 

pastimes serve the additional function of being social-selection processes. While a pastime is in 

progress, the Child in each player is watchfully assessing the potentialities of the others involved. 

At the end of the party, each person will have selected certain players he would like to see more of, 

while others he will discard, regardless of how skillfully or pleasantly they each engaged in the 

pastime. The ones he selects are those who seem the most likely candidates for more complex 

relationships — that is, games. This sorting system, however well rationalized, is actually largely 

unconscious and intuitive. 


(a) Projective "PTA" 
"Juvenile Delinquency" 

(b) Introjective "Psychiatry" 

<; FIGURE 6 > 

In special cases the Adult overrides the Child in the selection process. This is most clearly 
illustrated by an insurance salesman who carefully learns to play social pastimes. While he is 
playing, his Adult listens for possible prospects and selects them from the players as people he 
would like to see more of. Their adeptness at games or congeniality is quite irrelevant to his process 
of selection, which is based, as in most cases, on peripheral factors — in this instance, financial 

Pastimes, however, have a quite specific aspect of exclusiveness. For example, "Man Talk" and 
"Lady Talk" do not mix. People playing a hard hand of "Ever Been" (there) will be annoyed by an 
intruder who wants to play "How Much" (for avocados) or "Morning After." People playing 
Projective "PTA" will resent the intrusion of Introjective "PTA," although usually not as intensely 
as the other way around. 

Pastimes form the basis for the selection of acquaintances, and may lead to friendship. A party of 
women who drop in at each other's houses every morning for coffee to play "Delinquent Husband" 
are likely to give a cool reception to a new neighbor who wants to play "Sunny Side Up." If they 
are saying how mean their husbands are, it is too disconcerting to have a newcomer declare that her 
husband is just marvelous, in fact perfect, and they will not keep her long. So at a cocktail party, if 
someone wants to move from one corner to another, he must either join in the pastime played in his 
new location or else successfully switch the whole proceeding into a new channel. A good hostess, 
of course, takes the situation in hand immediately and states the program: "We were just playing 
Projective 'PTA.' What do you think' Or: "Come now, you girls have been playing 'Wardrobe' long 
enough. Mr. J. here is a writer/politician/surgeon, and I'm sure he'd like to play 'Look Ma No 
Hands.' Wouldn't you, Mr. F" 

Another important advantage obtained from pastimes is the confirmation of role and the stabilizing 
of position. A role is something like what Jung calls persona, except that it is less opportunistic and 
more deeply rooted in the individual's fantasies. Thus in Projective "PTA" one player may take the 
role of tough Parent, another the role of righteous Parent, a third the role of indulgent Parent and a 
fourth the role of helpful Parent. All four experience and exhibit a Parental ego state, but each 
presents himself differentiy. The role of each one is confirmed if it prevails — that is, if it meets 
with no antagonism or is strengthened by any antagonism it meets or is approved by certain types 
of people with stroking. 

The confirmation of his role stabilizes the individual's position, and this is called the existential 
advantage from the pastime. A position is a simple predicative statement which influences all of the 
individual's transactions; in the long run it determines his destiny and often that of his descendants 


as well. A position may be more or less absolute. Typical positions from which Projective "PTA" 

can be played are: "All children are bad!" "All other children are bad!" "All children are sad!" "All 

children are persecuted!" These positions might give rise to the role of die tough, the righteous, the 

indulgent and the helpful Parent, respectively. Actually a position is primarily manifested by the 

mental attitude to which it gives rise, and it is with this attitude that the individual undertakes the 

transactions which constitute his role. 

Positions are taken and become fixed surprisingly early, from the second or even the first year to 

the seventh year of life — in any case long before the individual is competent or experienced enough 

to make such a serious commitment. It is not difficult to deduce from an individual's position the 

kind of childhood he must have had. Unless something or somebody intervenes, he spends the rest 

of his life stabilizing his position and dealing with situations that threaten it: by avoiding them, 

warding other certain elements or manipulating them provocatively so that they are transformed 

from threats into justifications. One reason pastimes are so stereotyped is that they serve such 

stereotyped purposes. But the gains they offer show why people play them so eagerly, and why 

they can be so pleasant if played with people who have constructive or benevolent positions to 


A pastime is not always easy to distinguish from an activity, and combinations frequently occur. 

Many commonplace pastimes, such as "General Motors," consist of what psychologists might call 

Multiple-Choice — Sentence -Completion exchanges. 

A "I like a Ford/Chevrolet/Plymouth better than a Ford/Chevrolet/Plymouth because. ..." 

B. "Oh. Well, I'd rather have a Ford/Chevrolet/Plymouth than a Ford/Chevrolet/Plymouth 

because. ..." 

It is apparent that there may actually be some useful information conveyed in such stereotypes, 

A few other common pastimes may be mentioned. "Me Too" is often a variant of "Ain't It Awful." 

"Why Don't They" (do something about it) is a favorite among housewives who do not wish to be 

emancipated. "Then We'll" is a Child-Child pastime. "Let's Find" (something to do) is played by 

juvenile delinquents or mischievous grown-ups. 



A GAME is an ongoing series of complementary ulterior transactions progressing to a well-defined, 
predictable outcome. Descriptively it is a recurring set of transactions, often repetitious, 
superficially plausible, with a concealed motivation; or, more colloquially, a series of moves with a 
snare, or "gimmick." Games are clearly differentiated from procedures, rituals, and pastimes by two 
chief characteristics: (I) their ulterior quality and (2) the payoff. Procedures may be successful, 
rituals effective, and pastimes profitable, but all of them are by definition candid; they may involve 
contest, but not conflict, and the ending may be sensational, but it is not dramatic. Every game, on 
the other hand, is basically dishonest, and the outcome has a dramatic, as distinct from merely 
exciting, quality. 

It remains to distinguish games from the one remaining type of social action which so far has not 
been discussed. An operation is a simple transaction or set of transactions undertaken for a specific, 
stated purpose. If someone frankly asks for reassurance and gets it, that is an operation. If someone 
asks for reassurance, and after it is given turns it in some way to the disadvantage of the giver, that 
is a game. Superficially, then, a game looks like a set of operations, but after the payoff it becomes 
apparent that these operations were really maneuvers; not honest requests but moves in the game. 
In the "insurance game," for example, no matter what the agent appears to be doing in conversation, 
if he is a hard player he is really looking for or working on a prospect. What he is after, if he is 
worth his salt, is to "make a killing." The same applies to "the real estate game," "the panama 
game" and similar occupations- Hence at a social gathering, while a salesman is engaged in 
pastimes, particularly variants of "Balance Sheet," his congenial participation may conceal a series 


of skillful maneuvers designed to elicit the kind of information he is professionally interested in. 

There are dozens of trade journals devoted to improving commercial maneuvers, and which give 

accounts of outstanding players and games (interesting operators who make unusually big deals). 

Transactionally speaking, these are merely variants of Sports Illustrated, Chess World, and other 

sports magazines. 

As far as angular transactions are concerned — games which are consciously planned with 

professional precision under Adult control to yield the maximum gains — the big "con games" 

which flourished in the early 1900's are hard to surpass for detailed practical planning and 

psychological virtuosity. 

What we are concerned with here, however, are the unconscious games played by innocent people 

engaged in duplex transactions of which they are not fully aware, and which form the most 

important aspect of social life all over the world. Because of their dynamic qualities, games are 

easy to distinguish from mere static attitudes, which arise from taking a position. 

The use of the word "game" should not be misleading. As explained in the introduction, it does not 

necessarily imply fun or even enjoyment. Many salesmen do not consider their work fun, as Arthur 

Miller made clear in his play, The Death- of a Salesman. And there may be no lack of seriousness. 

Football games nowadays are taken very seriously, but no more so than such transactional games as 

"Alcoholic" or "Third-Degree Rapo". 

The same applies to the word "play," as anyone who has "played" hard poker or "played" the stock 

market over a long period can testify. The possible seriousness of games and play, and the possibly 

serious results, are well known to anthropologists. The most complex game that ever existed, that 

of "Courtier" as described so well by Stendhal in The Charterhouse of Parma, was deadly serious. 

The grimmest of all, of course, is "War." 


The most common game played between spouses is colloquially called "If It Weren't For You," and 

this will be used to illustrate the characteristics of games in general. 

Mrs. White complained that her husband severely restricted her social activities, so that she had 

never learned to dance. Due to changes in her attitude brought about by psychiatric treatment, her 

husband became less sure of himself and more indulgent. Mrs. White was then free to enlarge the 

scope of her activities. She signed up for dancing classes, and then discovered to her despair that 

she had a morbid fear of dance floors and had to abandon this project. 

This unfortunate adventure, along with similar ones, laid bare some important aspects of the 

structure of her marriage. Out of her many suitors she had picked a domineering man for a husband. 

She was then in a position to complain that she could do all sorts of things "if it weren't for you." 

Many of her women friends also had domineering husbands, and when they met for their morning 

coffee, they spent a good deal of time playing "If It Weren't For Him." 

As it turned out, however, contrary to her complaints, her husband was performing a very real 

service for her by forbidding her to do something she was deeply afraid of, and by preventing her, 

in fact, from even becoming aware of her fears. This was one reason her Child had shrewdly 

chosen such a husband. 

But there was more to it than that. His prohibitions and her complaints frequently led to quarrels, so 

that their sex life was seriously impaired. And because of his feelings of guilt, he frequently 

brought her gifts which might not otherwise have been forthcoming; certainly when he gave her 

more freedom, his gifts diminished in lavishness and frequency. She and her husband had little in 

common besides their household worries and the children, so that their quarrels stood out as 

important events; it was mainly on these occasions that they had anything but the most casual 

conversations. At any rate, her married life had proved one thing to her that she had always 

maintained: that ail men were mean and tyrannical. As it turned out, this attitude was related to 

some daydreams of being sexually abused which had plagued her in earlier years. 

There are various ways of describing this game in general terms. It is apparent that it belongs in the 

large field of social dynamics. The basic fact is that by marrying, Mr. and Mrs. White have an 


opportunity to communicate with each other, and such an opportunity may be called social contact. 
The fact that they use this opportunity makes their household a social aggregation, as contrasted 
with a New York subway train, for example, where people are in spatial contact but rarely avail 
themselves of the opportunity and so form a this-social aggregation. The influence the Whites exert 
on each other's behavior and responses constitutes social action. Various disciplines would 
investigate such social action from different points of view. Since we are here concerned with the 
personal histories and psycho-dynamics of the individuals involved, the present approach is one 
aspect of social -psychiatry; some implicit or explicit judgment is passed on the "healthiness" of the 
games studied. This is somewhat different from the more neutral and less committed attitudes of 
sociology and social psychology. Psychiatry reserves the right to say, "Just a moment!" which the 
other disciplines do not. Transactional analysis is a branch of social psychiatry, and game analysis 
is a special aspect of transactional analysis. 

Practical game analysis deals with special cases as they appear in specific situations. Theoretical 
game analysis attempts to abstract and generalize the characteristics of various games, so that they 
can be recognized independentiy of their momentary verbal content and their cultural matrix. The 
theoretical analysis of "If It Weren't For You," Marital Type, for example, should state the 
characteristics of that game in such a way that it can be recognized just as easily in a New Guinea 
jungle village as in a Manhattan penthouse, whether it is concerned with a nuptial party or with the 
financial problems of getting a fishing rod for the grandchildren; and regardless of how bluntly or 
subtly the moves are made, according to the permissible degrees of frankness between husband and 
wife. The prevalence of the game in a given society is a matter for sociology and anthropology. 
Game analysis, as a part of social psychiatry, is only interested in describing the game when it does 
occur, regardless of how often that may be. This distinction is not complex, but it is analogous to 
the distinction between public health and internal medicine; the first is interested in the prevalence 
of malaria, while the latter studies cases of malaria as they come up, in the jungle or in Manhattan. 
At the present time the scheme given below has been round the most useful one for theoretical 
game analysis. No doubt it will be improved as further knowledge accumulates. The first requisite 
is to recognize that a certain sequence of maneuvers meets the criteria of a game. As many samples 
as possible of the game are then collected. The significant features of the collection are isolated. 
Certain aspects emerge as essential. These are then classified under headings which are designed to 
be as meaningful and instructive as possible in the current state of knowledge. The analysis is 
undertaken from the point of view of the one who is "it" — in this case, Mrs. White. 
Thesis. This is a genera) description of the game, including the immediate sequence of events (the 
social level) and information about their psychological background, evolution and significance (the 
psychological level). In the case of "If It Weren't For You," Marital Type, the details already given 
will serve (pp. 50-51). For the sake of brevity, this game will henceforth be referred to as IWFY. 
Antithesis. The presumption that a certain sequence constitutes a game is tentative until it has been 
existentially validated. This validation is carried out by a refusal to play or by undercutting the 
payoff. The one who is "it" will then make more intense efforts to continue the game. In the face of 
adamant refusal to play or a successful undercutting he will then lapse into a state called "despair," 
which in some respects resembles a depression, but is different in significant ways. It is more acute 
and contains elements of frustration and bewilderment. It may be manifested, for example, by the 
onset of perplexed weeping. In a successful therapeutic situation this may soon be replaced by 
humorous laughter, implying an Adult realization: "There I go again!" Thus despair is a concern of 
the Adult, while in depression it is the Child who has the executive power. Hopefulness, 
enthusiasm or a lively interest in one's surroundings is the opposite of depression; laughter is the 
opposite of despair. Hence the enjoyable quality of therapeutic game analysis. The antithesis to 
IWFY is permissiveness. As long as the husband is prohibitive, the game can proceed. If instead of 
saying "Don't you dare!" he says "Go ahead!" the underlying phobias are unmasked, and the wife 
can no longer turn on him, as demonstrated in Mrs. White's case. 
For clear understanding of a game, the antithesis should be known and its effectiveness 
demonstrated in practice. 


Aim, This states simply the general purpose of the game. Sometimes there are alternatives. The aim 
of IWFY may be stated as either reassurance ("It's not that I'm afraid, it's that he won't let me") or 
vindication ("It's not that I'm not trying, it's that he holds me back"). The reassuring function is 
easier to clarify and is more in accord with the security needs of the wife; therefore IWFY is most 
simply regarded as having the aim of reassurance. 

Roles. As previously noted, ego states are not roles but phenomena. Therefore ego states and roles 
have to be distinguished in a formal description. Games may be described as two-handed, three- 
handed, many-handed, etc., according to the number of roles offered. Sometimes the ego state of 
each player corresponds to his role, sometimes it does not. 

IWFY is a two-handed game and calls For a restricted wife and a domineering husband. The wife 
may play her role either as a prudent Adult ("It's best that I do as he says") or as a petulant Child. 
The domineering husband may preserve an Adult ego state ("It's best that you do as I say") or slip 
into a Parental one ("You'd better do what I say"). 

Dynamics. There are alternatives in staring the psycho-dynamic driving forces behind each case of 
a game. It is usually possible, however, to pick out a single psychodynamic concept which usefully, 
aptly and meaningfully epitomizes the situation. Thus IWFY is best described as deriving from 
phobic sources. 

Examples. Since the childhood origins of a game, or its infantile prototypes, are instructive to 
study, it is worthwhile to search for such cognates in making a formal description. It happens that 
IFWY is just as frequently played by little children as by grown-ups, so the childhood version is the 
same as the later one, with the actual parent substituted for the restricting husband. 
Transactional Paradigm. The transactional analysis of a typical situation is presented, giving both 
the social and psychological levels of a revealing ulterior transaction. In its most dramatic form, 
IWFY at the social level is a Parent-Child game. 
Mr. White: "You stay home and take care of the house." 
Mrs. White: "If it weren't for you, I could be out having fun." 

At the psychological level (the ulterior marriage contract) the relationship is Child-Child, and quite 

Mr. White: "You must always be here when I get home. I'm terrified of desertion." 
Mrs. White: "I will be if you help me avoid phobic situations." 
The two levels are illustrated in Figure 7. 

Mister Missis 

"Stay home" "If ft weren't for you" 

("I'm terrified") ("Protect me'*) 

< FIGURE 7 > A Game 


Moves. The moves of a game correspond roughly to the strokes in a ritual. As in any game, the 
players become increasingly adept with practice. Wasteful moves are eliminated, and more and 
more purpose is condensed into each move. "Beautiful friendships" are often based on the fact that 
the players complement each other with great economy and satisfaction, so that there is a maximum 
yield with a minimum effort from the games they play with each other. Certain intermediate, 
precautionary or concessional moves can be eluded, giving a high degree of elegance to the 
relationship. The effort saved on defensive maneuvers can be devoted to ornamental flourishes 
instead, to the delight of both parries and sometimes of the onlookers as well. The student observes 
that there is a minimum number of moves essential to the program of the game, and these can be 
stated in the protocol. Individual players will embellish or multiply these basic moves according to 
their needs, talents or desires. The framework for IWFY is as follows: 

(1) Instruction-Compliance ("You stay home" — "All right"). 

(2) Instruction-Protest ("You stay home again" — "If it weren't for you"). 

Advantages. The general advantages of a game consist in its stabilizing (homeostatic) functions. 
Biological homeo-stasis is promoted by the stroking, and psychological stability is reinforced by 
the confirmation of position. As has already been noted, stroking may take various forms, so that 
the biological advantage of a game may be stated in tactile terms. Thus the husband's role in IWFY 
is reminiscent of a backhanded slap (quite different in effect from a palmar slap, which is a direct 
humiliation), and the wife's response is something like a petulant kick in the shins. Hence the 
biological gain from IWFY is derived from the belligerence-petulance exchanges: a distressing but 
apparently effective way to maintain the health of nervous tissues. 

Confirmation of the wife's position — "All men are tyrants" — is the existential advantage. This 
position is a reaction to the need to surrender that is inherent in the phobias, a demonstration of the 
coherent structure which underlies all games. The expanded statement would be: "If I went out 
alone in a crowd, I would be overcome by the temptation to surrender; at home I don't surrender: he 
forces me, which proves that all men are tyrants." Hence this game is commonly played by women 
who suffer from feelings of unreality, which signifies their difficulty in keeping the Adult in charge 
in situations of strong temptation. The detailed elucidation of these mechanisms belongs to 
psychoanalysis rather than game analysis. In game analysis the end product is the chief concern. 
Internal psychological advantage of a game is its direct effect on the psychic economy (libido). In 
IWFY the socially acceptable surrender to the husband's authority keeps the woman from 
experiencing neurotic fears. At the same time it satisfies masochistic needs, if they exist, using 
masochism not in the sense of self-abnegation but with its classical meaning of sexual excitement 
in situations of deprivation, humiliation or pain. That is, it excites her to be deprived and dominated. 
External psychological advantage is the avoidance of the feared situation by playing the game. This 
is especially obvious in IWFY, where it is the outstanding motivation: by complying with the 
husband's strictures, the wife avoids the public situations which she fears. 
Internal social advantage is designed by the name of the game as it is played in the individual's 
intimate circle. By her compliance, the wife gains the privilege of saying "If it weren't for you." 
This helps to structure the time she must spend with her husband; in the case of Mrs. White, this 
need for structure was especially strong because of the lack of other common interests, especially 
before the arrival of their offspring and after the children were grown. In between, the game was 
played less intensively and less frequently, because the children performed their usual function of 
structuring time for their parents, and also provided an even more widely accepted version of 
IWFY, the busy-housewife variation. The fact that young mothers in America often really are very 
busy does not change the analysis of this variation. Game analysis only attempts to answer this 
question without prejudice: given that a young woman is busy, how does she go about exploiting 
her busyness in order to get some compensation for it? 

External social advantage is designated by the use made of the situation in outside social contacts. 
In the case of the game "If It Weren't For You," which is what the wife says to her husband, there is 
a transformation into the pastime "If It Weren't For Him" when she meets with her friends over 
morning coffee. Again, the influence of games in the selection of social companions is shown. The 


new neighbor who is invited for morning coffee is being invited to play "If It Weren't For Him." If 
she plays, well and good, she will soon be a bosom friend of the old-timers, other things being 
equal. If she refuses to play and insists on taking a charitable view of her husband, she will not last 
long. Her situation will be the same as if she kept refusing to drink at cocktail parties — in most 
circles, she would gradually be dropped from the guest lists. 

This completes the analysis of the formal features of IWFY. In order to clarify the procedure 
further, the analysis of "Why Don't You — Yes But," which is the most common game played at 
social gatherings, committee meetings and psychotherapy groups the world over, should be 
consulted (page 115). 


From the present point of view, child rearing may be regarded as an educational process in which 
the child is taught what games to play and how to play diem. He is also taught procedures, rituals 
and pastimes appropriate to his position in the local social situation, but these are less significant. 
His knowledge of and skill in procedures, rituals and pastimes determine what opportunities will be 
available to him, other things being equal; but his games determine the use he will make of those 
opportunities, and the outcomes of situations for which he is eligible. As elements of his script, or 
unconscious life-plan, his favored games also determine his ultimate destiny (again with other 
things being equal): the payoffs on his marriage and career, and the circumstances surrounding his 

While conscientious parents devote a great deal of attention to teaching their children procedures, 
rituals and pastimes appropriate to their stations in life, and with equal care select schools, colleges 
and churches where their teachings will be reinforced, they tend to overlook the question of games, 
which form the basic structure for the emotional dynamics of each family, and which the children 
learn through significant experiences in everyday living from their earliest months. Related 
questions have been discussed for thousands of years in a rather general, unsystematic fashion, and 
there has been some attempt at a more methodical approach in the modern orthopsychiatric 
literature; but without the concept of games there is little possibility of a consistent investigation. 
Theories of internal individual psychodynamics have so far not been able to solve satisfactorily the 
problems of human relationships. These are transactional situations which call for a theory of social 
dynamics that cannot be derived solely from consideration of individual motivations. 
Since there are as yet few well-trained specialists in child psychology and child psychiatry who are 
also trained in game analysis, observations on the genesis of games are sparse. Fortunately, the 
following episode took place in the presence of a well-educated transactional analyst. 
Tanjy, age 7, got a stomach-ache at the dinner table and asked to be excused for that reason. His 
parents suggested that he lie down for a while. His little brother Mike, age 3, then said, "I have a 
stomach-ache too," evidently angling for the same consideration. The father looked at him for a few 
seconds and then replied, "You don't want to play that game, do you?" Whereupon Mike burst out 
laughing and said, "No!" 

If this had been a household of food or bowel faddists, Mike would also have been packed off to 
bed by his alarmed parents. If he and they had repeated this performance several times, it might be 
anticipated that this game would have become part of Mike's character, as it so often does if the 
parents cooperate. Whenever he was jealous of a privilege granted to a competitor, he would plead 
illness in order to get some privileges himself. The ulterior transaction would then consist of: 
(social level) "I don't feel well" + (psychological level) "You must grant me a privilege, too." Mike, 
however, was saver from such a hypochondriacal career. Perhaps he will end up with a worse fate, 
but that is not the issue. The issue is that a game in statu nascendi was broken right there by the 
father's question and by the boy's frank acknowledgment that what he proposed was a game. 
This demonstrates clearly enough that games are quite deliberately initiated by young children. 
After they become fixed patterns of stimulus and response, their origins become lost in the mists of 
time and their ulterior nature becomes obscured by social fogs. Both can be brought into awareness 
only by appropriate procedures: the origin by some form of analytic therapy and the ulterior aspect 


by antithesis. Repeated clinical experience along these lines makes it clear that games are imitative 
in nature, and that they are initially set up by the Adult (neopsychic) aspect of the child's 
personality. If the Child ego state can be revived in the grown-up player, the psychological aptitude 
of this segment (the Adult aspect of the Child ego state) is so striking, and its skill in manipulating 
people so enviable, that it is colloquially called "The Professor" (of Psychiatry). Hence in 
psychotherapy groups which concentrate on game analysis, one of the more sophisticated 
procedures is the search for the little "Professor" in each patient, whose early adventures in setting 
up games between the ages of two and eight are listened to by everyone present with fascination 
and often, unless the games are tragic, with enjoyment and even hilarity, in which the patient 
himself may join with justifiable self-appreciation and smugness. Once he is able to do that, he is 
well on his way to relinquishing what may be an unfortunate behavior pattern which he is much 
better off without. 

Those are the reasons why in the formal description of a game an attempt is always made to 
describe the infantile or childhood prototype. 


Because there is so little opportunity for intimacy in daily life, and because some forms of intimacy 
(especially if intense) are psychologically impossible for most people, the bulk of the time in 
serious social life is taken up with playing games. Hence games are both necessary and desirable, 
and the only problem at issue is whether the games played by an individual offer the best yield for 
him. In this connection it should be remembered that the essential feature of a game is its 
culmination, or payoff. The principal function of the preliminary moves is to set up the situation for 
this payoff, but they are always designed to harvest the maximum permissible satisfaction at each 
step as a secondary product. Thus in "Schlemiel" (making messes and then apologizing) the payoff, 
and the purpose of the game, is to obtain the forgiveness which is forced by the apology; the 
spillings and cigarette burns are only steps leading up to this, but each such trespass yields its own 
pleasure. The enjoyment derived from the spilling does not make spilling a game. The apology is 
the critical stimulus that leads to the denouement. Otherwise the spilling would simply be a 
destructive procedure, a delinquency perhaps enjoyable. 

The game of "Alcoholic" is similar: whatever the physiological origin, if any, of the need to drink, 
in terms of game analysis the imbibing is merely a move in a game which is carried on with the 
people in the environment. The drinking may bring its own kinds of pleasure, but it is not the 
essence of the game. This is demonstrated in the variant of "Dry Alcoholic," which involves the 
same moves and leads to the same payoff as the regular game, but is played without any bottles. 
Beyond their social function in structuring time satisfactorily, some games are urgently necessary 
for the maintenance of health in certain individuals. These people's psychic stability is so 
precarious, and their positions are so tenuously maintained, that to deprive them of their games may 
plunge them into irreversible despair and even psychosis. Such people will fight very hard against 
any antithetical moves. This is often observed in marital situations when the psychiatric 
improvement of one spouse (i-e., the abandonment of destructive games) leads to rapid 
deterioration in the other spouse, to whom the games were of paramount importance in maintaining 
equilibrium. Hence it is necessary to exercise prudence in game analysis. 
Fortunately, the rewards of game-free intimacy, which is or should be the most perfect form of 
human living, are so great that even precariously balanced personalities can safely and joyfully 
relinquish their games if an appropriate partner can be found for the better relationship. 
On a larger scale, games are integral and dynamic components of the unconscious life-plan, or 
script, of each individual; they serve to fill in the time while he waits for the final fulfillment, 
simultaneously advancing the action. Since the last act of a script characteristically calls for either a 
miracle or a catastrophe, depending on whether the script is constructive or destructive, the 
corresponding games ate accordingly either constructive or destructive. In colloquial terms, an 
individual whose script is oriented toward "waiting for Santa Claus" is likely to be pleasant to deal 
with in such games as "Gee You're Wonderful, Mr. Murgatroyd," while someone with a tragic 


script oriented toward "waiting for rigor mortis to set in" may play such disagreeable games as 
"Now I've Got You, You Son of a Bitch." 

It should be noted that colloquialisms such as those in the previous sentence are an integral part of 
game analysis, and are freely used in transactional psychotherapy groups and seminars. The 
expression "waiting for rigor mortis to set in" originated in a dream of a patient, in which she 
decided to get certain things done "before rigor mortis set in." A patient in a sophisticated group 
pointed out what the therapist had overlooked: that in practice, waiting for Santa Claus and waiting 
for death are synonymous. Since colloquialisms are of decisive importance in game analysis, they 
will be discussed at length later on. 


Most of the variables used in analyzing games and pastimes have already been mentioned, and any 
of them can be used in classifying games and pastimes systematically. Some of the more obvious 
classifications are based on the following factors: 

1. Number of players: two-handed games (Frigid Woman), three-handed games (Let's You and 
Him Fight), five-handed games (Alcoholic) and many-handed games (Why Don't You- Yes But). 

2. Currency used: words (Psychiatry), money (Debtor), parts of the body (Polysurgery). 

3. Clinical types: hysterical (Rapo), obsessive-compulsive (Schlemiel), paranoid (Why Does This 
Have to Happen to Me), depressive (There I Go Again). 

4. Zonal: oral (Alcoholic), anal (Schlemiel), phallic (Let's You and Him Fight). 

5. Psychodynamic: counterphobic (If It Weren't for You), projective (PTA), introjective 

6. Instinctual: masochistic (If It Weren't for You), sadistic (Schlemiel), fetishistic (Frigid Man). 

In addition to the number of players, three other quantitative variables are often useful to consider: 

1. Flexibility. Some games, such as Debtor and Poly-surgery, can be played properly with only one 
kind of currency, while others, such as exhibitionistic games, are more flexible. 

2. Tenacity. Some people give up their games easily, others are persistent. 

3. Intensity. Some people play their games in a relaxed way, others are more tense and aggressive. 
Games so played are known as easy and hard games, respectively. 

These three variables converge to make games gentle or violent. In mentally disturbed people, there 
is often a noticeable progression in this respect, so that one can speak of stages. A paranoid 
schizophrenic may initially play a flexible, loose, easy game of first-stage "Ain't It Awful" and 
progress to an inflexible, tenacious, hard third stage. The stages in a game are distinguished as 

a. A First-Degree Game is one which is socially acceptable in the agent's circle. 

b. A Second-Degree Game is one from which no permanent, irremediable damage arises, but which 
the players would rather conceal from the public. 

c. A Third-Degree Game is one which is played for keeps, and which ends in the surgery, the 
courtroom or the morgue. 

Games can also be classified according to any of the other specific factors discussed in the analysis 
of IWFY: the aims, the roles, the most obvious advantages. The most likely candidate For a 
systematic, scientific classification is probably one based on the existential position; but since 
knowledge of this factor is not yet sufficientiy advanced, such a classification will have to be 
postponed. Failing that, the most practical classification at present is probably a sociological one. 
That is what will be used in the next section. 


Due credit should be given to Stephen Potter for his perceptive, humorous discussions of 
maneuvers, or "ploys," in everyday social situations A and to G. H. Mead for his pioneering study of 
the role of games in social living.3 Those games that lead to psychiatric disabilities have been 
systematically studied at the San Francisco Social Psychiatry Seminars since 1958, and this sector 


of game analysis has recently been approached by T. Szasz.4 For the role of games in the group 
process, die present writer's book on group dynamics should be consulted.* 


1. Maurer, D. W. The Big Con. The Bofabs-Merrill Co., New York, 1940. 

2. Potter, S. Theory and Practice of Gamentanship. Henry Holt & Company, New York, n.d. 

3. Mead, G. H, Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1934. 
GAMES/ 65 

4. Szasz, T. The Myth of Mental Illness. Harper & Brothers, New York' 1961. . . 

5. Berne, E. The Structure and Dynamics of Organizations and Group's. J. B. Lippincott Company, 
Philadelphia and Montreal, 1963. 



A Thesaurus of Games 


THIS collection is complete to date (1962), but new games are continually being discovered. 
Sometimes what appears to be another example of a known game turns out, on more careful study, 
to be an entirely new one, and a game which appears to be new often turns out to be a variation of a 
known one. The individual items of the analyses are also subject to change as new knowledge 
accumulates; for example, where there are several possible choices in describing dynamics, the 
statement given may turn out later not to have been the most cogent one. Both the list of games and 
the items given in the analyses, however, are adequate for clinical work. 

Some of the games are discussed and analyzed in extenso. Others, which require more investigation, 
or are uncommon, or whose significance is fairly obvious, are only briefly mentioned. The one who 
is "it" is generally referred to as the "agent," or is given the name of "White," while the other party 
is called "Black." 

The games are classified into families according to the situations in which they most commonly 
occur: Life Games, Marital Games, Party Games, Sexual Games and Underworld Games; then 
comes a section for professionals on Consulting Room Games, and finally, some examples of Good 


The following notation will be used in the analytic protocols. 

Title: If the game has a long name, a convenient abbreviation is used in the text. Where a game or 

its variations has more than one name, a cross reference will be found in the Index of Games. In 

oral reports it is preferable to use the full name of the game rather than its abbreviation or acronym. 

Thesis: this is restated as cogently as possible. 

Aim: this gives the most meaningful choice, based on die writer's experience. 

Roles: the role of the one who is "it," and from whose point of view the game is discussed, is given 

first, in italics. 

Dynamics: as with aim. 

Examples: (1) this gives an illustration of the game as played in childhood, the most easily 

recognizable pertinent prototype. (2) an illustration from adult life. 

Paradigm: this illustrates as briefly as possible the critical transaction or transactions at the social 

and psychological levels. 

Moves: this gives the minimum number of transactional stimuli and transactional responses as 

found in practice. These may be expanded, diluted or ornamented to an unlimited extent in different 


Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — this attempts to state how the game contributes to internal 

psychic stability. (2) External Psychological — this attempts to state what anxiety-arousing 

situations or intimacies are being avoided. (3) Internal Social — this gives the characteristic phrase 

used in the game as played with intimates. (4) External Social — this gives the key phrase used in 

the derivative game or pastime played in less intimate circles. 

(5) Biological — this attempts to characterize the kind of stroking which the game offers to the 
parties involved. 

(6) Existential — this states the position from which the game is typically played. 
Relatives: this gives the names of complementary, allied and antithetical games. 

An adequate understanding of a game can only be obtained in the psychotherapeutic situation. 
People who play destructive games will come to the therapist far more frequently than people who 
play constructive ones. Therefore most of the games which are well understood are basically 


destructive, but the reader should remember that there are constructive ones played by more 
fortunate people. 

And to prevent the idea of games from becoming vulgarized, as so many psychiatric terms are, it 
should be emphasized once more that it is a very precise idea: games should be clearly 
distinguished, by the criteria given previously, from procedures, rituals, pastimes, operations, 
maneuvers and the attitudes which arise from various positions. A game is played from a position, 
but a position or its corresponding attitude is not a game. 


Many colloquialisms used here were supplied by patients. All of them, if used with due regard to 
timing and sensibilities, are appreciated, understood and enjoyed by the players. If some of them 
seem disrespectful, the irony is directed against the games and not against the people who play 
them. The first requirement for colloquialisms is aptness, and if they often sound amusing, that is 
precisely because they hit the nail on the head. As I have tried to show elsewhere in discussing 
colloquial epithets, a whole page of learned polysyllables may not convey as much as the statement 
that a certain woman is a bitch, or that a certain man is a jerk.l Psychological truths may be stated 
for academic purposes in scientific language, but the effective recognition of emotional strivings in 
practice may require a different approach. So we prefer playing 'Ain't It Awful" to "verbalizing 
projected anal aggression." The former not only has a more dynamic meaning and impact, but it is 
actually more precise. And sometimes people get better faster in bright rooms than diey do in drab 


1. Berne, E. "Intuition IV: Primal Images & Primal Judgments." Psychiatric Quarterly. 29: 634-658, 



Life Games 

ALL games have an important and probably decisive influence on the destinies of the players under 
ordinary social conditions; but some offer more opportunities than others for lifelong careers and 
are more likely to involve relatively innocent bystanders. This group may be conveniently called 
Life Games. It includes "Alcoholic," "Debtor," "Kick Me," "Now I've Got You, You Son of a 
Bitch," "See What You Made Me Do" and their principal variants. They merge on the one side with 
marital games, and on the other with those of the underworld. 


Thesis. In game analysis there is no such thing as alcoholism or "an alcoholic," but there is a role 
called the Alcoholic in a certain type of game. If a biochemical or physiological abnormality is the 
prim A mover in excessive drinking-and that is still open to some question - then its study belongs in 
the field of internal medicine. Game analysis is interested in something quite different — the kinds 
of social transactions that are related to such excesses. Hence the game "Alcoholic." 
In its full flower this is a five-handed game, although the roles may be condensed so that it starts 
off and terminates as a two-handed one. The central role is that of the Alcoholic — the one who is 
"it" — played by White. The chief supporting role is that of Persecutor, typically played by a 
member of the opposite sex, usually the spouse. The third role is that of Rescuer, usually played by 
someone of the same sex, often the good family doctor who is interested in the patient and also in 
drinking, problems. In the classical situation the doctor successfully rescues the alcoholic from his 
habit. After White has not taken a drink for six months they congratulate each other. The following 
day White is found in the gutter. 

The fourth role is that of the Patsy, or Dummy. In literature this is played by the delicatessen man 
who extends credit to White, gives him a sandwich on the curt and perhaps a cup of coffee, without 
either persecuting him or trying to rescue him. In life this is more frequently played by White's 
mother, who gives him money and often sympathizes with him about the wife who does not 
understand him. In this aspect of the game, White is required to account in some plausible way for 
his need for money — by some project in which both pretend to believe, although they know what 
he is really going to spend most of the money for. Sometimes the Patsy slides over into another role, 
which is a helpful but not essential one: the Agitator, the "good guy" who offers supplies without 
even being asked for them: "Come have a drink with me (and you will go downhill faster)." 
The ancillary professional in all drinking games is the bartender or liquor clerk. In the game 
"Alcoholic" he plays the fifth role, the Connection, the direct source of supply who also 
understands alcoholic talk, and who in a way is the most meaningful person in the life of any addict. 
The difference between the Connection and the other players is the difference between 
professionals and amateurs in any game: the professional knows when to stop. At a certain point a 
good bartender refuses to serve the Alcoholic, who is then left without any supplies unless he can 
locate a more indulgent Connection. 

In the initial stages of "Alcoholic," the wife may play all three supporting roles: at midnight the 
Patsy, undressing him, making him coffee and letting him beat up on her; in the morning the 
Persecutor, berating him for the evil of his ways; and in the evening the Rescuer, pleading with him 
to change them. In the later stages, due sometimes to organic deterioration, the Persecutor and the 
Rescuer can be dispensed with, but are tolerated if they are also wilting to act as sources of supply. 
White will go to the Mission House and be rescued if he can get a free meal there; or be will stand 
for a scolding, amateur or professional, as long as he can get a handout afterward. 
Present experience indicates that the payoff in "Alcoholic" (as is characteristic of games in general) 
comes from the aspect to which most investigators pay least attention. In the analysis of this game, 
drinking itself is merely an incidental pleasure having added advantages, the procedure leading up 
to the culmination, which is the hangover. It is the same in the game of Schlemiel: the mess-making, 


which attracts the most attention, is merely a pleasure-giving way for White to lead up to the crux, 
which is obtaining forgiveness from Black. 

For the Alcoholic the hangover is not as much the physical pain as the psychological torment. The 
two favorite pastimes of drinking people are "Martini" (how many drinks and how they were mixed) 
and "Morning After" (Let me tell you about my hangover). "Martini" is played, for the most part, 
by social drinkers; many alcoholics prefer a hard round of psychological "Morning After," and 
organizations such as A.A. offer him an unlimited opportunity for this. 

Whenever one patient visited his psychiatrist after a binge, he would call himself all sorts of names; 
the psychiatrist said nothing. Later, recounting these visits in a therapy group, White said with 
smug satisfaction that it was the psychiatrist who had called him all those names. The main 
conversational interest of many alcoholics in the therapeutic situation is not their drinking, which 
they apparently mention mostly in deference to their persecutors, but their subsequent suffering. 
The transactions! object of the drinking, aside from the personal pleasures it brings, is to set up a 
situation where the Child can be severely scolded not only by the internal Parent but by any 
parental figures in the environment who are interested enough to oblige. Hence the therapy of this 
game should be concentrated not on the drinking but on the morning after, the self-indulgence in 
self-castigation. There is a type of heavy drinker, however, who does not have hangovers, and such 
people do not belong in the present category. 

There is also a game "Dry Alcoholic," in which White goes through the process of financial or 
social degradation without a bottie, making the same sequence of moves and requiring the same 
supporting cast. Here again, the morning after is the crux of the matter. Indeed, it is the similarity 
between "Dry Alcoholic" and regular "Alcoholic" which emphasizes that both are games; for 
example, the procedure for getting discharged from a job is the same in both. "Addict" is similar to 
"Alcoholic," but more sinister, more dramatic, more sensational and faster. In our society, at least, 
it leans more heavily on the readily available Persecutor, with Patsies and Rescuers being few and 
far between and the Connection playing a much more central role. 

There are a variety of organizations involved in "Alcoholic," some of them national or even 
international in scope, others local. Many of them publish rules for the game. Nearly all of them 
explain how to play the role of Alcoholic: take a drink before breakfast, spend money allotted for 
other purposes, etc. They also explain the function of the Rescuer. Alcoholics Anonymous, for 
example, continues playing the actual game but concentrates on inducing the Alcoholic to take the 
role of Rescuer. Former Alcoholics are preferred because they know how the game goes, and hence 
are better qualified to play the supporting role than people who have never played before. Cases 
have been reported of a chapter of A.A. running out of Alcoholics to work on; whereupon the 
members resumed drinking since there was no other way to continue the game in the absence of 
people to rescue. 

There are also organizations devoted to improving the lot of the other players. Some put pressure 
on the spouses to shift their roles from Persecutor to Rescuer. The one which seems to come closest 
to the theoretical ideal of treatment deals with teen-age offspring of alcoholics; these young people 
are encouraged to break away from the game itself, rather than merely shift their roles. 
The psychological cure of an alcoholic also lies in getting him to stop playing the game altogether, 
rather than simply change from one role to another. In some cases this has been feasible, although it 
is a difficult task to find something else as interesting to the Alcoholic as continuing his game. 
Since he is classically afraid of intimacy, the substitute may have to be another game rather than a 
game-free relationship. Often so-called cured alcoholics are not very stimulating company socially, 
and possibly they feel a lack of excitement in their lives and are continually tempted to go back to 
their old ways. The criterion of a true "game cure" is that the former Alcoholic should be able to 
drink socially without putting himself in jeopardy. The usual "total abstinence" cure will not satisfy 
the game analyst. 

It is apparent from the description of this game that there is a strong temptation for the Rescuer to 
play "I'm Only Trying to Help You": for the Persecutor to play "Look What You've Done to Me"; 
and for the Patsy to play "Good Joe." With the rise of rescue organizations which publicize the idea 


that alcoholism is a disease, alcoholics have been taught to play "Wooden Leg." The law, which 
takes a special interest in such people, tends to encourage this nowadays- The emphasis has shifted 
from the Persecutor to the Rescuer, from "I am a sinner" to "What do you expect from a sick 
manel" (part of the trend in modern thinking away from religion and toward science). From an 
existential point of view the shift is questionable, and from a practical point of view it seems to 
have done little to diminish the sale of liquor to heavy 

*In the underworld slang "patsy" once meant all right, or satisfactory, and later came to denote a 
"pigeon" drinkers. Nevertheless, Alcoholics Anonymous is still for most people the best initiation 
into the therapy of over-indulgence. 

Antithesis. As is well known, "Alcoholic" is usually played hard and is difficult to give up. In one 
case a female alcoholic in a therapy group participated very little until she thought she knew 
enough about the other members to go ahead with her game. She then asked them to tell her what 
they thought of her. Since she had behaved pleasantly enough, various members said nice things 
about her, but she protested: "That's not what I want. I want to know what you really think." She 
made it clear that she was seeking derogatory comments. The other women refused to persecute her, 
whereupon she went home and told her husband that if she took another drink, he must either 
divorce her or send her to a hospital. He promised to do this, and that evening she became 
intoxicated and he sent her to a sanitarium. Here the other members refused to play the persecutory 
roles White assigned to them; she was unable to tolerate this antithetical behavior, in spite of 
everyone's efforts to reinforce whatever insight she had already obtained. At home she found 
someone who was willing to play the role she demanded. 

In other cases, however, it appears possible to prepare the patient sufficiently so that the game can 
be given up, and to attempt a true social cure in which the therapist declines to play either 
Persecutor or Rescuer. It is equally untherapeutic for him to play the role of Patsy by allowing the 
patient to forego his financial and punctuality obligations. The correct therapeutic procedure from a 
transactional point of view is, after careful preliminary groundwork, to take an Adult contractual 
position and refuse to play any of the roles, hoping that the patient will be able to tolerate not only 
abstinence from drinking but also from playing his game. If he cannot, he is best referred to a 

Antithesis is particularly difficult, because the heavy drinker is highly regarded in most Western 
countries as a desirable object for censure, concern or generosity, and someone who refuses to play 
any of these roles tends to arouse public indignation. A rational approach may be even more 
alarming to the Rescuers than to the Alcoholic, sometimes with unfortunate consequences to the 
therapy. In one clinical situation a group of workers were seriously interested in the game 
"Alcoholic" and were attempting to effect real cures by breaking up the game rather than merely 
rescuing the patients. As soon as this became apparent, they were frozen out by the lay committee 
which was backing the clinic, and none of them was ever again called on to assist in treating these 

Relatives. An interesting byplay in "Alcoholic" is called "Have One." This was discovered by a 
perceptive student of industrial psychiatry. White and his wife (a non-drinking Persecutor) go on a 
picnic with Black and his wife (both Patsies). White says to the Blacks, "Have one!" If they have 
one, this gives White license to have four or five. The game is unmasked if the Blacks refuse. 
White, by the rules of drinking, is then entitled to be insulted, and he will find more compliant 
companions for his next picnic. What appears at the social level to be Adult generosity, is at the 
psychological level an act of insolence, whereby White's Child obtains Parental indulgence from 
Black by open bribery under the very nose of Mrs. White, who is powerless to protest. Actually it is 
just because she will be "powerless" to protest dial Mrs. White consents to the whole arrangement, 
since she is just as anxious for the game to continue, with herself in the role of Persecutor, as Mr. 
White is with himself in the role of Alcoholic, Her recriminations against him in the morning after 
die picnic are easy to imagine. This variant can cause complications if White is Black's boss. 
In general the Patsy is not as badly off as the name implies. Patsies are often lonely people who 
have a great deal to gain by being nice to Alcoholics. The delicatessen man who plays "Good Joe" 


makes many acquaintances in this way, and he can get a good reputation in his own social circle 
not only as a generous person but also as a good storyteller. 

One variant of "Good Joe," incidentally, is to go around asking for advice about how best to help 
people. This is an example of a jolly and constructive game worth encouraging. Its inverse is Tough 
Guy, taking lessons in violence or asking for advice about how best to hurt people. Although the 
mayhem is never put into practice, the player has the privilege of associating with real tough guys 
who are playing for keeps, and can bask in their reflected glory. This is one species of what the 
French call un fanfaron de vice. 


Thesis: How bad I've been; see if you can stop me. Aim: Self-castigation. 

Roles: Alcoholic, Persecutor, Rescuer, Patsy, Connection. Dynamics: Oral deprivation. 

Examples: (1) See if you can catch me. The prototypes of this game are difficult to correlate 

because of its complexity. Children, however, particularly children of alcoholics, often go through 

many of the maneuvers characteristic of the Alcoholic. "See if you can stop me," which involves 

lying, hiding things, seeking derogatory comments, looking for helpful people, finding a benevolent 

neighbor who will give free handouts, etc. Self-castigation is often postponed to later years. 

(2) The alcoholic and his circle, Social Paradigm: Adult-Adult. 

Adult: "Tell me what you really think of me or help me stop drinking." 

Adult: "I'll be frank with you." Psychological Paradigm: Parent-Child. Child: "See if you can stop 

me." Parent: "You must stop drinking because. ..." 

Moves: (1) Provocation — accusation or forgiveness. (2) Indulgence — anger or disappointment. 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — (a) Drinking as a procedure — rebellion, reassurance and 

satisfaction of craving, (b) "Alcoholic" as a game — self-castigation (probable). (2) External 

Psychological — avoidance of sexual and other forms of intimacy. (3) Internal Social — See if you 

can stop me. (4) External Social — "Morning After," "Martini," and other pastimes. (5) Biological — 

alternating loving and angry exchanges. (6) Existential — Everybody wants to deprive m, 


Thesis. "Debtor" is more than a game. In America it tends to become a script, a plan for a whole 
lifetime, just as it does in some of the jungles of Africa and New Guinea.2 There the relatives of a 
young man buy him a bride at an enormous price, putting him in their debt for years to come. Here 
die same custom prevails, at least in the more civilized sections of the country, except that the bride 
price becomes a house price, and if there is no stake from the relatives, this role is taken on by the 
bank. Thus the young man in New Guinea with an old wrist watch dangling from his ear to ensure 
success, and the young man in America with a new wrist watch wrapped around his arm to ensure 
success, both feel that they have a "purpose" in life. The big celebration, the wedding or 
housewarming, takes place not when the debt is discharged, but when it is undertaken. What is 
emphasized on TV, for example, is not the middle-aged man who has finally paid off his mortgage, 
but the young man who moves into his new home with his family, proudly waving the papers he 
has just signed and which will bind him for most of his productive years. After he has paid his 
debts — the mortgage, the college expenses for his children and his insurance — he is regarded as a 
problem, a "senior citizen" for whom society must provide not only material comforts but a new 
"purpose." As in New Guinea, if he is very shrewd, he may become a big creditor instead of a big 
debtor, but this happens relatively rarely. 

As this is written, a sow bug crawls across a desk. If he is turned over on his back, one can observe 
the tremendous struggle he goes through to get on his feet again. During this interval he has a 
"purpose" in his life. When he succeeds, one can almost see the look of victory on his face. Off he 
goes, and one can imagine him telling his tale at the next meeting of sow bugs, looked up to by the 
younger generation as an insect who has made it. And yet mixed with his smugness is a little 
disappointment. Now that he has come out on top, life seems aimless. Maybe he will return in the 


hope of repeating his triumph. It might be worth marking his back with ink, so as to recognize him 
if he risks it. A courageous animal, the sow bug. No wonder he has survived for millions of years. 
Most young Americans, however, take their mortgages very seriously only in times of stress. If 
they are depressed, or the economic situation is bad, their obligations keep them going -and may 
prevent some of them from committing suicide. Most of the time they play a mild game of "If It 
Weren't for the Debts," but otherwise enjoy themselves. Only a few make a career out of playing a 
hard game of "Debtor," 

"Try and Collect" (TAG) is commonly played by young married couples, and illustrates how a 
game is set up so that the player "wins" whichever way it goes. The Whites obtain all sorts of goods 
and services on credit, petty or luxurious, depending on their backgrounds and how they were 
taught to play by their parents or grandparents. If the creditor gives up after a few soft efforts to 
collect, then the Whites can enjoy their gains without penalty, and in this sense they win. If the 
creditor makes more strenuous attempts, then they enjoy the pleasures of the chase as well as the 
use of their purchases. The hard form of the game occurs if the creditor is determined to collect. In 
order to get his money he will have to resort to extreme measures. These usually have a coercive 
element — going to White's employers or driving up to his house in a noisy, garish truck labeled in 

At this point there is a switch. White now knows that he will probably have to pay. But because of 
the coercive element, made clear in most cases by the "third letter" from the collector ("If you do 
not appear at our office within 48 hours. . . ."), White feels peremptorily justified in getting angry; 
he now switches over to a variant of "Now I've Got You, You Son of a Bitch." In this case he wins 
by demonstrating that the creditor is greedy, ruthless and untrustworthy. The two most obvious 
advantages of this are (1) it strengthens White's existential position, which is a disguised form of 
"All creditors are grasping," and (2) it offers a large external social gain, since he is now in a 
position to abuse the creditor openly to his friends without losing his own status as a "Good Joe." 
He may also exploit further internal social gain by confronting the creditor himself. In addition, it 
vindicates his taking advantage of the credit system: if that is the way creditors are, as he has now 
shown, why pay anybody? 

"Creditor," in the form "Try and Get Away With It" (TAGAWI), is sometimes played by small 
landlords. TAG and TAGAWI players readily recognize each other, and because of the prospective 
transactional advantages and the promised sport, they are secretly pleased and readily become 
involved with each other. Regardless of who wins the money, each has improved the other's 
position for playing "Why Does This Always Happen To Me?" after it is all over. 
Money games can have very serious consequences. If these descriptions sound facetious, as they do 
to some people, it is not because they relate to trivia but because of the exposure of trivial 
motivations behind matters people are taught to take seriously. 

Antithesis. The obvious antithesis of TAG is to request immediate payment in cash. But a good 
TAG player has methods for getting around that, which will work on any but the most hard-boiled 
creditors. The antithesis of TAGAWI is promptness and honesty. Since hard TAG and TAGAWI 
players are both professionals in every sense of die word, an amateur stands as much chance 
playing against them as he does playing against professional gamblers. While the amateur seldom 
wins, he can at least enjoy himself if he becomes involved in one of these games. Since both are by 
tradition played grimly, nothing is more disconcerting to the professionals than to have an amateur 
victim laugh at the outcome. In financial circles this is considered strictly Out. In the cases reported 
to this writer, laughing at a debtor when one encounters him on the street is just as bewildering, 
frustrating and disconcerting to him as playing anti-"Schlemiel" is to a Schlemiel. 


Thesis. This is played by men whose social manner is equivalent to wearing a sign that reads 
"Please Don't Kick Me." The temptation is almost irresistible, and when the natural result follows, 
White cries piteously, "But the sign says 'don't kick me.'" Then he adds incredulously, "Why does 
this always happen to me?" (WAHM.) Clinically, the WAHM may be introjected and disguised in 


the "Psychiatry" cliche": "Whenever I'm under stress, I get all shook up." One game element in 
WAHM comes from inverse pride: "My misfortunes are better than yours." This factor is often 
found in paranoids. 

If the people in his environment are restrained from striking at him by kindheartedness, "I'm Only 
Trying to Help You," social convention or organizational rules, his behavior becomes more and 
more provocative until he transgresses the limits and forces them to oblige. These are men who are 
cast out, the jilted and the job losers. 

The corresponding game among women is "Threadbare. 1 Often genteel, they take pains to be 
shabby. They see to it that their earnings, for "good" reasons, never rise much above the subsistence 
level. If they have a windfall, there are always enterprising young men who will help them get rid 
of it, giving them in return shares in a worthless business promotion or something equivalent. 
Colloquially, such a woman is called "Mother's Friend," always ready to give judicious Parental 
advice and living vicariously on the experience of others. Their WAHM is a silent one, and only 
(heir demeanor of brave struggle suggests "Why does this always happen to me?" 
An interesting form of WAHM occurs in well-adapted people who reap increasing rewards and 
successes, often beyond their own expectations. Here the WAHM may lead to serious and 
constructive thinking, and to personal growth in the best sense, if it takes the form "What did I 
really do to deserve this?" 


Thesis. This can be seen in classic form in poker games. White gets an unbeatable hand, such as 
four aces. At this point, if he is a NIGYSOB player, he is more interested in the fact that Black is 
completely at his mercy than he is in good poker or making money- 
White needed some plumbing fixtures installed, and he reviewed the costs very carefully with the 
plumber before giving him a go-ahead. The price was set, and it was agreed that there would be no 
extras. When the plumber submitted his bill, he included a few dollars extra for an unexpected 
valve that had to be installed — about four dollars on a four-hundred-dollar job. White became 
infuriated, called the plumber on the phone and demanded an explanation. The plumber would not 
back down. White wrote him a long letter criticizing his integrity and ethics and refused to pay the 
bill until the extra charge was withdrawn. The plumber finally gave in. 

It soon became obvious that both White and the plumber were playing games. In the course of their 
negotiations, they bad recognized each other's potentials. The plumber made his provocative move 
when he submitted this bill. Since White had the plumber's word, the plumber was clearly in the 
wrong. White now felt justified in venting almost unlimited rage against Him. Instead of merely 
negotiating in a dignified way that befit the Adult standards he set for himself, perhaps with a little 
innocent annoyance, White took the opportunity to make extensive criticisms of the plumber's 
whole way of living. On the surface their argument was Adult to Adult, a legitimate business 
dispute over a stated sum of money. At the psychological level it was Parent to Adult: White was 
exploiting his trivial but socially defensible objection (position) to vent the pent-up furies of many 
years on his cozening opponent, just as his mother might have done in a similar situation. He 
quickly recognized his underlying attitude (NIGYSOB) and realized how secretly delighted he had 
been at the plumber's provocation. He then recalled that ever since early childhood he had looked 
for similar injustices, received diem with delight and exploited them with the same vigor. In many 
of the cases he recounted, he had forgotten the actual provocation, but remembered in great detail 
the course of the ensuing battle. The plumber, apparently, was playing some variation of "Why 
Does This Always Happen to Me?" (WAHM). 

NIGYSOB is a two-handed game which must be distinguished from "Ain't It Awful?" (AIA). In 
AIA the agent seeks injustices in order to complain about them to a third party, making a three- 
handed game: Aggressor, Victim, Confidant. AIA is played under the slogan "Misery Loves 
Company." The confidant is usually someone who also plays AIA. WAHM is three-handed, too, 
but here the agent is trying to establish his pre-eminence in misfortune and resents competition 


from other unfortunates. NIGYSOB is commercialized in a three-handed professional form as the 
"badger game." It may also be played as a two-handed marital game in more or less subtle forms. 
Antithesis. The best antithesis is correct behavior. The contractual structure of a relationship with a 
NIGYSOB player should be explicitiy stated in detail at the first opportunity, and the rules strictly 
adhered to. In clinical practice, for example, the question of payment for missed appointments or 
cancellations must be settled clearly at once, and extra precautions must be taken to avoid mistakes 
in bookkeeping. If an unforeseen contretemps arises, the antithesis is to yield gracefully without 
dispute, until such time as the therapist is prepared to deal with the game. In everyday life, business 
dealings with NIGYSOB players are always calculated risks. The wife of such a person should be 
treated with polite correctness, and even the mildest flirtations, gallantries or slights should be 
avoided, especially if the husband himself seems to encourage them. 


Thesis: Now I've got you, you son of a bitch. Aim: Justification. Roles: Victim, Aggressor. 

Dynamics: Jealous rage. 

Examples: (1) I caught you this time. (2) Jealous husband. 

Social Paradigm: Adult-Adult. 

Adult: "See, you have done wrong." Adult: "Now that you draw it to my attention, I guess I have." 

Psychological Paradigm: Parent-Child. 

Parent: "I've been watching you, hoping you'd make a slip." 

Child: "You caught me this time." Parent: "Yes, and I'm going to let you feel the full force of my 


Moves; (I) Provocation — Accusation. (2) Defense-Accusation. (3) Defense — Punishment. 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological-justification for rage. (2) External Psychological — avoids 

confrontation of own deficiencies. (3) Internal Social-NIGYSOB. (4) External Social — they're 

always out to get you. (5) Biological-belligerent exchanges, usually ipsisexual. (6) Existential — 

people can't be trusted. 


Thesis. In its classical form this is a marital game, and in fact is a "three-star marriage buster," but 
it may also be played between parents and children and in working life. 

(1) First-Degree SWYMD: White, feeling unsociable, becomes engrossed in some activity which 
tends to insulate him against people. Perhaps all he wants at the moment is to be left alone. An 
intruder, such as his wife or one of his children, comes either for stroking or to ask him something 
like, "Where can I find the long-nosed pliers?" This interruption "causes" his chisel, paintbrush, 
typewriter or soldering iron to slip, whereupon he turns on the intruder in a rage and cries, "See 
what you made me do." As this is repeated through the years, his family tends more and more to 
leave him alone when he is engrossed. Of course it is not the intruder but his own irritation which 
"causes' the slip, and he is only too happy when it occurs, since it gives him a lever for ejecting the 
visitor. Unfortunately this is a game which is only too easily learned by young children, so that it is 
easily passed on from generation to generation. The underlying satisfaction and advantages are 
more clearly demonstrated when it is played more seductively. 

(2) Second-Degree SWYMD: If SWYMD is the basis for a way of life, rather than merely being 
used occasionally as a protective mechanism, White marries a woman who plays "I'm Only Trying 
to Help You" or one of its relatives. It is then easy for him to defer decisions to her. Often this may 
be done in the guise of considerateness or gallantry. He may deferentially and courteously let her 
decide where to go for dinner or which movie to see. If things cum out well, he can enjoy them. If 
not, he can blame her by saying or implying: "You Got Me Into This," a simple variation of 
SWYMD. Or he may throw the burden of decisions regarding the children's upbringing on her, 
while he acts as executive officer; if the children get upset he can play a straight game of SWYMD. 
This lays the groundwork through the years. For blaming mother if the children turn out badly; then 


SWYMD is not an end in itself, but merely offers passing satisfaction on the way to "I Told You 
So" or "See What You've Done Now." 

The professional player who pays his psychological way with SWYMD will use it also in his work. 
In occupational SWYMD the long-suffering look of resentment replaces words. The player 
"democratically" or as part of "good management" asks his assistants for suggestions. In this way 
he may attain an unassailable position for terrorizing his juniors. Any mistake he makes can be 
used against them by blaming them for it. Used against seniors (blaming them for one's mistakes), 
it becomes self-destructive and may lead to termination of employment or, in the army, to transfer 
to another unit. In that case it is a component of "Why Does This Always Happen To Me?" with 
resentful people, or of "There I Go Again" with depressives — (both of the "Kick Me" family). 
(3) Third-Degree SWYMD: in a hard form SWYMD may be played by paranoids against people 
incautious enough to give them advice (.see "I'm Only Trying to Help You"). There it may be 
dangerous, and in rare cases even fatal. 

"See What You Made Me Do" (SWYMD) and "You Got Me Into This" (UGMIT) complement 
each other nicely, so that the SWYMD-UGMIT combination is a classical basis for the covert game 
contract in many marriages. This contract is illustrated by the following sequence. 
By mutual agreement Mrs. White did the family bookkeeping and paid the bills out of the joint 
checking account because Mr. White was "poor at figures." Every few months they would be 
notified of an overdraft, and Mr. White would have to square it with the bank. When they looked 
for the source of the difficulty, it would turn out that Mrs. White had made an expensive purchase 
without telling her husband. When this came to light, Mr. White would furiously play his UGMIT, 
and she would tearfully accept his rebuke and promise it would not happen again. Everything 
would go smoothly for a while, and then a creditor's agent would suddenly appear to demand 
payment for a long-overdue bill. Mr. White, not having heard of this bill, would question his wife 
about it. She would then play her SWYMD, saying that it was his fault. Since he had forbidden her 
to overdraw their account, the only way she could make ends meet was by leaving this large 
obligation unpaid and hiding the duns from him. 

These games had been allowed to go on for ten years, on the basis that each occurrence would be 
the last, and that from then on it would be different — which it was, for a few months. In therapy Mr. 
White very cleverly analyzed this game without any assistance from the therapist, and also devised 
an effective remedy. By mutual agreement he and Mrs. White put all charge accounts and their 
bank account in his name. Mrs. White continued to do the bookkeeping and make out the checks, 
but Mr. White saw the hills first and controlled the outgoing payments. In this way neither duns nor 
overdrafts could get by him, and they now shared the budgetary labor. Deprived of die satisfactions 
and advantages of SWYMD-UGMIT, the Whites were at first at a loss, and were then driven to 
find more open and constructive types of gratification from each other. 

Antithesis. The antithesis to First-Degree SWYMD is to leave the player alone, and to Second- 
Degree SWYMD to throw the decision back on White. The First-Degree player may react by 
feeling forlorn, but seldom angry; the Second-Degree player may become sulky if he is forced to 
take the initiative, so that systematic anti-SWYMD leads to disagreeable consequences. The 
antithesis to Third-Degree SWYMD should be put into competent professional hands. 


The aim of this game is vindication. Dynamically the mild form may be related to premature 
ejaculation, the hard form to rage based on "castration" anxiety. It is easily acquired by children. 
The external psychological gain - avoidance of responsibility) is prominent, and the game is often 
precipitated by the threat of impending intimacy, since the "justifiable" anger offers a good excuse 
for avoiding sexual relations. The existential position is, "I am blameless," 


Thanks are due to Dr. Rodney Nurse and Mrs. Frances Matson of the Center for Treatment and 

Education on Alcoholism in Oakland, California, and to Dr. Kenneth Everts, Dr. R. J. Starrels, Dr. 


Robert Goulding and others with a special interest in this problem, for their continued efforts in the 
study of "Alcoholic" as a game, and for their contribution to and criticism of the present discussion. 


1. Berne, Eric. A Layman's Guide to Psychiatry & Psychoanalysis. Simon & Schuster, New York, 
1957, p. 191. 

2. Mead, Margaret. Growing Up in New Guinea. William Morrow & Company, New York, 1951. 


Marital Came 

ALMOST any game can form the scaffolding For married life and family living, but some, such as 
"IF It Weren't for You," flourish better or, like "Frigid Woman," are tolerated longer, under the 
legal force of contractual intimacy. Marital games, of course, can only be arbitrarily separated from 
sexual games, which are treated is a separate section. Those games which characteristically evolve 
into their most full-blown forms in the marital relationship include "Comer," "Courtroom," "Frigid 
Woman" and "Frigid Man," "Harried," "If It Weren't for You," "Look How Hard I've Tried" and 


Thesis. Comer illustrates more clearly than most games their manipulative aspect and their function 

as barriers to intimacy. Paradoxically, it consists of a disingenuous refusal to play the game of 


1. Mrs. White suggests to her husband that they go to a movie. Mr. White agrees. 

2a. Mrs. White makes an "unconscious" slip. She mentions quite naturally in the course of 

conversation that the house needs painting. This is an expensive project, and White has recently 

told her that their finances are strained; he requested her not to embarrass or annoy him by 

suggesting unusual expenditures, at least until the beginning of the new month. This is therefore an 

ill-chosen moment to bring up the condition of the house, and White responds rudely. 

2b. Alternatively: White steers the conversation around to the house, making it difficult for Mrs. 

White to resist die temptation to say that it needs painting. As in the previous case, White responds 


3. Mrs. White takes offense and says that if he is in one of his bad moods, she will not go to die 
movie with him, and he had best go by himself. He says if that is die way she feels about it, he will 
go alone. 

4. White goes to die movie (or out with the boys), leaving Mrs. White at home to nurse her injured 
feelings. There are two possible gimmicks in this game: A. Mrs. White knows very well from past 
experience that she is not supposed to take his annoyance seriously. What he really wants is for her 
to show some appreciation of how hard he works to earn their living; then they could go off happily 
together. But she refuses to play, and he feels badly lei down. He leaves filled with disappointment 
and resentment, while she stays at home looking abused, but with a secret feeling of triumph. 

B. White knows very well from past experience that he is not supposed to take her pique seriously. 
What she really wants is to be honeyed out of it; then they would go off happily together. But he 
refuses to play, knowing that his refusal is dishonest: he knows she wants to be coaxed, but 
pretends he doesn't. He leaves the house, feeling cheerful and relieved, but looking wronged. She is 
left feeling disappointed and resentful. 

In each of these cases die winner's position is, from a naive standpoint, irreproachable; all he or she 
has done is take the other literally. This is clearer in (B), where White takes Mrs. White's refusal to 
go at face value. They both know that this is cheating, but since she said it, she is cornered. 
The most obvious gain here is die external psychological. Both of diem find movies sexually 
stimulating, and it is more or less anticipated that after they return from the theater, they will make 
love. Hence whichever one of them wants to avoid intimacy sets up the game in move (2a) or (2b). 
This is a particularly exasperating variety of "Uproar" (see Chapter 9). The "wronged" party can, of 
course, make a good case for not wanting to make love in a state of justifiable indignation, and the 
cornered spouse has no recourse. 

Antithesis. This is simple for Mrs. White. All she has to do is change her mind, take her husband 
by the arm, smile and go along with him (a shift from Child to Adult ego state). It is more difficult 
for Mr. White, since she now has die initiative; but if he reviews die whole situation, he may be 


able to coax her into going along with him, either as a sulky Child who has been placated or, better, 

as an Adult. 

"Comer" is found in a somewhat different form as a family game involving the children, where it 

resembles the "double-bind" described by Bateson and his associates. 1 Here the child is cornered, 

so that whatever he does is wrong. According to the Bateson school, this may be an important 

etiological factor in schizophrenia. In the present language, then, schizophrenia may be a child's 

antithesis to "Corner." Experience in treating adult schizophrenics with game analysis bears this 

out — that is, if the family game of "Comer" is analyzed to demonstrate that the schizophrenic 

behavior was and is specifically undertaken to counter this game, partial or total remission occurs 

in a properly prepared patient. 

An everyday form of "Corner" which is played by the whole family and is most likely to affect the 

character development of the younger children occurs with meddlesome "Parental" parents. The 

little boy or girl is urged to be more helpful around the house, but when he is, the parents find fault 

with what he does — a homely example of "damned if you do and damned if you don't." This 

"double-bind" may be called the Dilemma Type of "Corner." 

"Corner" is sometimes found as an etiological factor in asthmatic children. 

Little girl: "Mommy, do you love me?" Mother: "What is love?" 

This answer leaves the child with no direct recourse. She wants to talk about mother, and mother 

switches the subject to philosophy, which the little girl is not equipped to handle. She begins to 

breathe hard, mother is irritated, asthma sets in, mother apologizes and the "Asthma Game" now 

runs its course. This "Asthma" type of "Corner" remains to be studied further. 

An elegant variant, which may be called the "Russell-Whitehead Type" of "Corner," sometimes 

occurs in therapy groups. 

Black: "Well, anyway, when we're silent nobody is playing games." 

White: "Silence itself may be a game." 

Red: "Nobody was playing games today." 

White: "But not playing games may itself be a game 

The therapeutic antithesis is equally elegant. Logical paradoxes are forbidden. When White is 

deprived of this maneuver, his underlying anxieties come quickly to the fore. Closely allied to 

"Corner" on the one hand, and to "Threadbare" on the other, is the marital game of "Lunch Bag." 

The husband, who can well afford to have lunch at a good restaurant, nevertheless makes himself a 

few sandwiches every morning, which he takes to the office in a paper bag. In this way he uses up 

crusts of bread, leftovers from dinner and paper bags which his wife saves for him. This gives him 

complete control over the family finances, for what wife would dare buy herself a mink stole in die 

face of such self-sacrifice? The husband reaps numerous other advantages, such as die privilege of 

eating lunch by himself and of catching up on his work during lunch hour. In many ways this is a 

constructive game which Benjamin Franklin would have approved of, since it encourages the 

virtues of thrift, hard work and punctuality. 


Thesis. Descriptively this belongs to the class of games which find their most florid expressions in 
law, and which includes "Wooden Leg" (the plea of insanity) and "Debtor" (the civil suit). 
Clinically it is most often seen in marital counseling and marital psychotherapy groups. Indeed, 
some marital counseling and marital groups consist of a perpetual game of "Courtroom" in which 
nothing is resolved, since the game is never broken up. In such cases it becomes evident that the 
counselor or therapist is heavily involved in the game without being aware of it. 
"Courtroom" can be played by any number, but is essentially three-handed, with a plaintiff, a 
defendant and a judge, represented by a husband, a wife and the therapist. If it is played in a 
therapy group or over the radio or TV, die other members of the audience are cast as the jury. The 
husband begins plaintively, "Let me tell you what (wife's name) did yesterday. She took the . . ." 
etc., etc. The wife then responds defensively, "Here is the way it really was . . . and besides just 


before that he was . . . and anyway at die time we were both ..." etc. The husband adds gallantly, 
"Well, I'm glad you people have a chance to hear both sides of the story, I only want to be fair." At 
this point the counselor says judiciously, "It seems to me that if we consider . . ." etc., etc. If there is 
an audience, the therapist may throw it to them with: "Well, let's hear what the others have to say." 
Or, if the group is already trained, they will play the jury without any instruction from him. 
Antithesis. The therapist says to the husband, "You're absolutely right!" If the husband relaxes 
complacently or triumphantly, the therapist asks: "How do you feel about my saying that?" The 
husband replies: "Fine." Then the therapist says, "Actually, I feel you're in the wrong." If the 
husband is honest, he will say: "I knew that all along." If be is not honest, he will show 'some 
reaction that makes it clear a game is in progress. Then it becomes possible to go into the matter 
further. The game element lies in the fact that while the plaintiff is overtly clamoring for victory, 
fundamentally he believes that he is wrong. 

After sufficient clinical material has been gathered to clarify the situation, the game can be 
interdicted by a maneuver which is one of the most elegant in the whole art of antithetics. The 
therapist makes a rule prohibiting the use of the (grammatical) third person in the group. 
Thenceforward the members can only address each other directly as "you" or talk about themselves 
as "I," but they cannot say, "Let me tell you about him" or "Let me tell you about her. "At this point 
the couple stop playing games in the group altogether, or shift into "Sweetheart," which is some 
improvement, or take up "Furthermore," which is no help at all. "Sweetheart" is described in 
another section (page 107). In "Furthermore" the plaintiff makes one accusation after the other. The 
defendant replies to each, "I can explain." The plaintiff pays no attention to the explanation, but as 
soon as the defendant pauses, he launches into his next indictment with another "furthermore," 
which is followed by another explanation — a typical Parent-Child interchange. 
"Furthermore" is played most intensively by paranoid defendants. Because of their literalness, it is 
particularly easy for them to frustrate accusers who express themselves in humorous or 
metaphorical terms. In general, metaphors are the most obvious traps to avoid in a game of 

In its everyday form, "Courtroom" is easily observed in children as a three-handed game between 
two siblings and a parent. "Mommy, she took my candy away" "Yes, but he took my doll, and 
before that he was hitting me, and anyway we both promised to share our candy." 


Thesis: They've got to say I'm right. Aim: Reassurance. 

Roles: Plaintiff, Defendant, Judge (and/or Jury). Dynamics: Sibling rivalry. 

Examples: (1) Children quarreling, parent intervenes. (2) Married couple, seek "help." Social 

Paradigm: Adult-Adult. 

Adult: "This is what she did to me." Adult: "The real facts are these." 

Psychological Paradigm: Child-Parent. Child: "Tell me I'm right." 

Parent: "This one is right." Or: "You're both right." 

Moves: (1) Complaint filed — Defense filed. (2) Plaintiff files rebuttal, concession, or good-will 

gesture. (3) Decision of judge or instructions to jury. (4) Final decision filed. 

Advantages; (1) Internal Psychological — projection of guilt. (2) External Psychological — excused 

from guilt. (3) Internal Social — "Sweetheart," "Furthermore," "Uproar" and others. (4) External 

Social — "Courtroom." (5) Biological — stroking from judge and jury. (6) Existential-depressive 

position, I'm always wrong. 


Thesis. This is almost always a marital game, since it is hardly conceivable that an informal liaison 
would present the required opportunities and privileges over a sufficient length of time, or that such 
a liaison would be maintained in the face of it. 


The husband makes advances to his wife and is repulsed. After repeated attempts, he is told that all 
men are beasts, he doesn't really love her, or doesn't love her for herself, that all he is interested in 
is sex. He desists for a time, then tries again with the same result. Eventually he resigns himself and 
makes no further advances. As the weeks or months pass, the wife becomes increasingly informal 
and sometimes forgetful. She walks through the bedroom half dressed or forgets her clean towel 
when she takes a bath so that he has to bring it to her. If she plays a hard game or drinks heavily, 
she may become flirtatious with other men at parties. At length he responds to those provocations 
and tries again. Once more he is repulsed, and a game of "Uproar" ensues involving their recent 
behavior, other couples, their in-laws, their finances and their failures, terminated by a slamming 

This time the husband makes up his mind that he is really through, that they will find a sexless 
modus vivendi, months pass. He declines the negligee parade and the forgotten towel maneuver. 
The wife becomes more provocatively informal and more provocatively forgetful, but he still 
resists. Then one evening she actually approaches him and kisses him. At first he doesn't respond, 
remembering his resolution, but soon nature begins to take its course after the long famine, and 
now he thinks he surely has it made. His first tentative advances are not repulsed. He becomes 
bolder and bolder. Just at the critical point, the wife steps back and cries: "See, what did I tell you! 
All men are beasts, all I wanted was affection, but all you are interested in is sex!" The ensuing 
game of "Uproar" at this point may skip the preliminary phases of their recent behavior and their 
in-laws, and go right to the financial problem. 

It should be noted that in spite of his protestations, the husband is usually just as afraid of sexual 
intimacy as his wife is, and has carefully chosen his mate to minimize • the danger of overtaxing 
his disturbed potency, which he can now blame on her. 

In its everyday form this game is played by unmarried ladies of various ages, which soon earns 
them a common slang epidiet. With diem it often merges into the game of indignation, or "Rapo." 
Antithesis. This is a dangerous game, and the possible antitheses are equally dangerous. Taking a 
mistress is a gamble. In the face of such stimulating competition, the wife may give up the game 
and try to initiate a normal married life, perhaps too late. On the other hand, she may use the affair, 
often with the help of a lawyer, as ammunition against the husband in a game of "Now I've Got 
You, You Son of a Bitch." The outcome is equally unpredictable if the husband undertakes 
psychotherapy and she does not. The wife's game may collapse as the husband grows stronger, 
leading to healthier adjustment; but if she is a hard player, improvement on his part may result in 
divorce. The best solution, if available, is for both parties to go into a transactional marital group, 
where the underlying advantages of the game and the basic sexual pathology can be laid bare. With 
this preparation both spouses may become interested in intensive individual psychotherapy. That 
may result in a psychological remarriage. If not, at least each of the parties may make a more 
sensible readjustment to the situation than they might have otherwise. 
The decent antithesis for the everyday form is to find another social companion. Some of the 
shrewder or more brutal antitheses are corrupt and even criminal. 

Relatives. The converse game, "Frigid Man," is less common, but it takes much the same general 
course with some variations in detail. The final outcome depends upon the scripts of the parties 

The crucial point of "Frigid Woman" is the terminal phase of "Uproar." Once this has run its course, 
sexual intimacy is out of the question, since both parties derive a perverse satisfaction from 
"Uproar" and have no need of further sexual excitement from each other. Hence the most important 
item in anti-"Frigid Woman" is to decline "Uproar." This leaves the wife in a state of sexual 
dissatisfaction which may be so acute that she will become more compliant. The use made of 
"Uproar" distinguishes "Frigid Woman" from "Beat Me Daddy," where "Uproar" is part of the 
foreplay; in "Frigid Woman," "Uproar" substitutes for the sex act itself. Thus in "Beat Me Daddy," 
"Uproar" is a condition of the sexual act, a kind of fetish which increases the excitement, while in 
"Frigid Woman," once "Uproar" has taken place, die episode is finished. 


An early analogue of "Frigid Woman" is played by that type of prissy little girl described by 
Dickens in Great Expectations. She comes out in her starched dress and asks the little boy to make 
her a mud pie. Then she sneers at his dirty hands and clothing and tells him how clean she is, 


Thesis: Now I've got you, you son of a bitch. Aim: Vindication. 

Roles: Proper Wife, Inconsiderate Husband. Dynamics: Penis envy. 

Examples: (1) Thank you for the mud pie, you dirty little boy. (2) Provocative, frigid wife. Social 

Paradigm: Parent-Child. 

Parent: "I give you permission to make me a mud pie (kiss me)-" 

Child: "I'd love to." Parent: "Now see how dirty you are." Psychological Paradigm: Child-Parent. 

Child: "See if you can seduce me." Parent: 'I'll try, if you stop me." Child: "See, it was you who 

started it" Moves: (1) Seduction-Response. (2) Rejection-Resignation. (3) Provocation-Response. 

(4) Rejection-Uproar. 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — freedom from guilt for sadistic fantasies. (2) External 

Psychological — avoids feared exhibition and penetration. (3) Internal Social — "Uproar." (4) 

External Social — What do you do with dirty little boys (husbands)? (5) Biological — inhibited sex 

play and belligerent exchanges. (6) Existential — I am pure. 


Thesis. This is a game played by the harried housewife. Her situation requires that she be proficient 
in ten or twelve different occupations; or, stated otherwise, that she fill gracefully ten or twelve 
different roles. From time to time semi-facetious lists of these occupations or roles appear in the 
Sunday supplements: mistress, mother, nurse, housemaid, etc. Since these roles are usually 
conflicting and fatiguing, their imposition gives rise in the course of years to the condition 
symbolically known as "Housewife's Knee" (since the knee is used for rocking, scrubbing, lifting, 
driving and so forth), whose symptoms are succinctly summarized in the complaint: "I'm tired." 
Now, if the housewife is able to set her own pace and find enough satisfaction in loving her 
husband and children, she will not merely serve but enjoy her twenty-five years, and see the 
youngest child off to college with a pang of loneliness. But if on die one hand she is driven by her 
inner Parent and called to account by the critical husband she has chosen for that purpose, and on 
the other unable to get sufficient satisfaction from loving her family, she may grow more and more 
unhappy. At first she may try to console herself with the advantages of "If It Weren't For You" and 
"Blemish" (and indeed, any housewife may fall back on these when the going gets rough); but soon 
these fail to keep her going. Then she has to find another way out, and that is the game of 

The thesis of this game is simple. She takes on everything that comes, and even asks for more. She 
agrees with her husband's criticisms and accepts all her children's demands. If she has to entertain 
at dinner, she not only feels she must function impeccably as a conversationalist, chatelaine over 
the household and servants, interior decorator, caterer, glamour girl, virgin queen and diplomat; she 
will also volunteer that morning to bake a cake and take the children to the dentist. If she already 
feels harassed, she makes the day even more harried. Then in the middle of the afternoon she 
justifiably collapses, and nothing gets done. She lets down her husband, the children and their 
guests, and her self-reproaches add to her misery. After this happens two or three times her 
marriage is in jeopardy, the children are confused, she loses weight, her hair is untidy, her face is 
drawn and her shoes are scuffed. Then she appears at the psychiatrist's office, ready to be 

Antithesis. The logical antithesis is simple: Mrs. White can fill each of her roles in succession 
during the week, but she must refuse to play two or more of them simultaneously. When she gives a 
cocktail party. For example, she can play either caterer or nursemaid, but not both. If she is merely 
suffering from Housewife's Knee, she may be able to limit herself in this way. 


If she is actually playing a game of "Harried," however, it will be very difficult for her to adhere to 
this principle. In that case the husband is carefully chosen; he is an otherwise reasonable man who 
will criticize his wife if she is not as efficient as he thinks his mother was. In effect, she marries his 
fantasy of his mother as perpetuated in his Parent, which is similar to her fantasy of her mother or 
grandmother. Having found a suitable partner, her Child can now settle into the harassed role 
necessary to maintain her psychic balance, and which she will not readily give up. The more 
occupational responsibility the husband has, the easier it is for both of them to find Adult reasons to 
preserve the unhealthy aspects of their relationship. 

When the position becomes untenable, often because of official school intervention on behalf of the 
unhappy offspring, the psychiatrist is called in to make it a three-handed game. Either the husband 
wants him to do an overhaul job in the wife, or the wife wants him as an ally against the husband. 
The ensuing proceedings depend on the skill and alertness of die psychiatrist. Usually the first 
phase, the alleviation of the wife's depression, will proceed smoothly. The second phase, in which 
she will give up playing "Harried" in favor of playing "Psychiatry," is the decisive one. It tends to 
arouse increasing opposition from both spouses. Sometimes this is well concealed and then 
explodes suddenly, though not unexpectedly. If this stage is weathered, then the real work of game 
analysis can proceed. 

It is necessary to recognize that the real culprit is the wife's Parent, her mother or grandmother; the 
husband is to some extent only a lay figure chosen to play his role in die game. The therapist has to 
fight not only this Parent and the husband, who has a heavy investment in playing his end, but also 
the social environment, which encourages the wife's compliance. The week after the article appears 
about the many roles a housewife has to play, there is a How'nt I Doing? in the Sunday paper: a 
ten-item test to determine "How Good A Hostess (Wife) (Modier) (Housekeeper) (Budgeteer) Are 
You?" For the housewife who plays "Harried," that is the equivalent of the little leaflet that comes 
with children's games, stating the rules. It may help to speed up die evolution of "Harried," which, 
if not checked, may end in a game of "State Hospital" ("The last thing I want is to be sent to a 

One practical difficulty with such couples is that die husband tends to avoid personal involvement 
with the treatment beyond playing "Look How Hard I'm Trying," because he is usually more 
disturbed than he cares to admit. Instead he may send indirect messages to the therapist, through 
temper outbursts which he knows will be reported by the wife. Hence "Harried" easily progresses 
to a third-degree life-death-divorce struggle. The psychiatrist is almost alone on the side of life, 
assisted only by the harried Adult of the patient which is locked in combat that may prove mortal 
against all three aspects of the husband, allied with her own inner Parent and Child. It is a dramatic 
battle, with odds of two against five, which tries the skill of the most game-free and professional 
therapist. If he quails, he can take the easy way out and offer his patient on the altar of the divorce 
court, which is equivalent to saying "I surrender — Let's you and him fight." 


Thesis. The detailed analysis of this game has already been given in Chapter 5. It was historically 
die second game uncovered, after "Why Don't You — Yes But," which up to that point had been 
regarded merely as an interesting phenomenon. With the additional discovery of IWFY, it became 
clear that there must be a whole department of social action based on ulterior transactions. This led 
to a more active search for such goings-on, and the present collection is one outcome. 
Briefly, a woman marries a domineering man so that he will restrict her activities and thus keep her 
from getting into situations which frighten her. If this were a simple operation, she might express 
her gratitude when he performed this service for her. In the game of IWFY, however, her reaction 
is quite the opposite: she takes advantage of the situation to complain about the restrictions, which 
makes her spouse feel uneasy and gives her all sorts of advantages. This game is the internal social 
advantage. The external social advantage is the derivative pastime "If It Weren't For Him," which 
she plays with her congenial lady friends. 



Thesis. In its common clinical form this is a three-handed game played by a married couple with a 
psychiatrist. The husband (usually) is bucking for a divorce, despite loud protestations to the 
contrary, while the spouse is more sincere in wanting to continue the marriage. He comes to the 
therapist under protest and talks just enough to demonstrate to the wife that he is cooperating; 
usually he plays a mild game of "Psychiatry" or "Courtroom." As time passes he exhibits either 
increasingly resentful pseudo-compliance or belligerent argumentativeness toward the therapist. At 
home he initially shows more "understanding" and restraint, and finally behaves worse than ever. 
After one, five or ten visits, depending on the skill of the therapist, he refuses to come any longer 
and goes hunting or fishing instead. The wife is then forced into filing for divorce. The husband is 
now blameless, since his wife has taken the initiative and he has demonstrated his good faith by 
going to the therapist. He is in a good position to say to any attorney, judge, friend or relative, 
"Look how hard I've tried!" 

Antithesis. The couple is seen together. If one — let us say the husband — is clearly playing this 
game, the other is taken into individual treatment and the player is sent on his way, on the valid 
ground that he is less ready for therapy. He can still get a divorce, but only at die expense of 
abandoning his position that he is really trying. If necessary, the wife can start the divorce, and her 
position is much improved since she really has tried. The favorable, hoped-for outcome is that the 
husband, his game broken up, will go into a state of despair and then seek treatment elsewhere with 
genuine motivation. 

In its everyday form this is easily observed in children as a two-handed game with one parent. It is 
played from either of two positions: "I am helpless" or "I am blameless." The child tries, but 
bungles or is unsuccessful. If he is Helpless, the parent has to do it for him. If he is Blameless, the 
parent has no reasonable grounds for punishing him. This reveals the elements of the game. The 
parents should find out two things: which of them taught the child this game; and what they are 
doing to perpetuate it. 

An interesting, though sometimes sinister, variant is "Look How Hard I Was Trying," which is 
usually a harder game of the second or third degree. This can be illustrated by the case of a hard- 
working man with a gastric ulcer. There are many people with progressive physical disabilities who 
do the best they can to cope with the situation, and they may enlist the help of their families in a 
legitimate way. Such conditions, however, can also be exploited for ulterior purposes. 
First Degree: A man announces to his wife and friends that he has an ulcer. He also lets them know 
that he is continuing to work. This elicits their admiration. Perhaps a person with a painful and 
unpleasant condition is entitled to a certain amount of ostentation as a poor recompense for his 
suffering. He should be given due credit for not playing "Wooden Leg" instead, and deserves some 
reward for continuing to assume his responsibilities. In such a case, die courteous reply to Took 
How Hard I'm Trying" is, "Yes, we all admire your fortitude and conscientiousness." 
Second Degree: A man is told that he has an ulcer, but keeps it a secret from his wife and friends. 
He continues working and worrying as hard as ever, and one day he collapses on the job. When his 
wife is notified, she gets the message instantiy: "Look How Hard I Was Trying." Now she is 
supposed to appreciate him as she never has before, and to feel sorry for all the mean things she has 
said and done in the past. In short, she is now supposed to love him, all previous methods of 
wooing her having failed. Unfortunately for the husband, her manifestations of affection and 
solicitude at this point are more apt to be motivated by guilt than by love. Deep down she is likely 
to be resentful because he is using unfair leverage against her, and has also taken unfair advantage 
of her by keeping his illness a secret. In short, a diamond bracelet is a much more honest instrument 
of courtship than a perforated stomach. She has the option of throwing the jewelry back at him, but 
she cannot decently walk out on the ulcer. A sudden confrontation with a serious illness is more 
likely to make her feel trapped than won over. 


This game can often be discovered immediately after the patient first hears that he has a potentially 
progressive disability. If he is going to play it, the whole plan will very likely flash through his 
mind at that point, and can be recovered by a careful psychiatric review of the situation. What is 
recovered is the secret gloating of his Child at learning that he has such a weapon, masked by his 
Adult concern at the practical problems raised by his illness. 

Third Degree: Even more sinister and spiteful is the sudden unheralded suicide because of serious 
illness. The ulcer progresses to cancer, and one day the wife, who has never been informed that 
anything serious is amiss, walks into' the bathroom and finds her husband lying there dead. The 
note says clearly enough, "Look How Hard I Was Trying." If something like this happens twice to 
the same woman, it is time for her to find out what she has been playing. 


Thesis: They can't push me around. 

Aim: Vindication. 

Roles: Standfast, Persecutor, Authority. 

Dynamics: Anal passivity. 

Examples: (1) Child dressing. (2) Spouse bucking for divorce. 

Social Paradigm: Adult-Adult. 

Adult: "It's time to (get dressed) (go to a psychiatrist)." 

Adult: "All right, I'll try it." Psychological Paradigm: Parent-Child. 

Parent: "I'm going to make you (get dressed) (go to a psychiatrist)." 

Child: "See, it doesn't work." 

Moves: (1) Suggestion-Resistance. (2) Pressure-Compliance. (3) Approval-Failure. 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — freedom from guilt for aggression. (2) External 

Psychological — evades domestic responsibilities. (3) Internal Social — Look how hard I've tried. (4) 

External Social — same. (5) Biological — belligerent exchanges. (6) Existential — I am helpless 



Thesis. This is seen in its fullest flower in the early stages of marital group therapy, when the 
parties feel defensive; it can also be observed on social occasions. White makes a subtly derogatory 
remark about Mrs. White, disguised as an anecdote, and ends: "Isn't that right, sweetheart?" Mrs. 
White tends to agree for two ostensibly Adult reasons: (a) because the anecdote itself is, in the main, 
accurately reported, and to disagree about what is presented as a peripheral detail (but is really the 
essential point of the transaction) would seem pedantic; (b) because it would seem surly to disagree 
with a man who calls one "sweetheart" in public. The psychological reason for her agreement, 
however, is her depressive position. She married him precisely because she knew he would perform 
this service for her: exposing her deficiencies and thus saving her from the embarrassment of 
having to expose them herself. Her parents accommodated her the same way when she was little. 
Next to "Courtroom," this is the most common game played in marital groups. The more tense the 
situation, and the closer the game is to exposure, the more bitterly is the word "sweetheart" 
enunciated, until the underlying resentment becomes obvious. On careful consideration it can be 
seen that this is a relative of "Schlemiel," since the significant move is Mrs. White's implicit 
forgiveness for White's resentment, of which she is trying hard not to be aware. Hence anti- 
"Sweetheart" is played analogously to anti-"Schlemiel": "You can tell derogatory anecdotes about 
me, but please don't call me 'sweetheart'" This antithesis carries with it the same perils as does anti- 
"Schlemiel." A more sophisticated and less dangerous antithesis is to reply: "Yes, honey!" 
In another form the wife, instead of agreeing, responds with a similar "Sweetheart" type anecdote 
about the husband, saying in effect, "You have a dirty face too, dear." 

Sometimes the endearments are not actually pronounced, but a careful listener can hear them even 
when they are unspoken. This is "Sweetheart," Silent Type. 



1. Bateson, G., et al. "Toward a Theory of Schizophrenia." Behavioral Science. 1: 251-264, 1956. 

Party Games 

PARTIES are for pastimes, and pastimes are for parties (including the period before a group 
meeting officially begins), but as acquaintanceship ripens, games begin to emerge. The Schlemiel 
and his victim recognize each other, as do Big Daddy and Little Old Me; all the familiar but 
disregarded processes of selection get under way. In this section four games which are typically 
played in ordinary social situations are considered: "Ain't It Awful," "Blemish," "Schlemiel," and 
"Why Don't You— Yes But." 


Thesis. This is played in four significant forms: Parental pastime, Adult pastime, Child pastime and 
game. In the pastimes there is no denouement or payoff, but much un-wordly feeling. 

1. "Nowadays" is the self-righteous, punitive or even vicious parental pastime. Sociologically it is 
common among certain types of middle-aged women with small independent incomes. One such 
woman withdrew from a therapy group when her opening move was met with silence instead of 
with the excited corroboration she was accustomed to in her social circle. In this more sophisticated 
group, accustomed to game analysis, there was a conspicuous lack of togetherness when White 
remarked: "Speaking of not trusting people, it's no wonder you can't trust anyone nowadays. I was 
looking through the desk of one of my roomers, and you won't believe what I found." She knew the 
answers to most of the current community problems: juvenile delinquency (parents too soft 
nowadays); divorce (wives without enough to do to keep them busy nowadays); crime (foreigners 
moving into white neighborhoods nowadays); and rising prices (businessmen too grasping 
nowadays). She made it clear that she herself was not soft with her delinquent son, nor with her 
delinquent tenants. 

"Nowadays" is differentiated from idle gossip by its slogan "It's no wonder." The opening move 
may be the same (They say that Flossie Murgatroyd"), but in "Nowadays" there is direction and 
closure; an "explanation" may be offered. Idle gossip merely rambles or trails off. 

2. "Broken Skin" is the more benevolent Adult variation, with the slogan "What a pity!" although 
the underlying motivations are equally morbid. "Broken Skin" deals primarily with the flow of 
blood; it is essentially an informal clinical colloquium. Anyone is eligible to present a case, the 
more horrifying the better, and details are eagerly considered. Blows in the face, abdominal 
operations and difficult childbirths are accepted topics. Here the differentiation from idle gossip lies 
in the rivalry and surgical sophistication. Pathological anatomy, diagnosis, prognosis and 
comparative case studies are systematically pursued. A good prognosis is approved in idle gossip, 
but in "Broken Skin" a consistently hopeful outiook, unless obviously insincere, may invoke a 
secret meeting of the Credentials Committee because the player is -non -particeps criminis. 

3. "Water Cooler," or "Coffee Break," is the Child pastime, with the slogan "Look what they're 
doing to us now." This is an organizational variant. It may be played after dark in the milder 
political or economic form called "Bar Stool." It is actually three-handed, the ace being held by the 
often shadowy figure called "They." 

4. As a game, "Ain't It Awful" finds its most dramatic expression in polysurgery addicts, and their 
transactions illustrate its characteristics. These are doctor-shoppers, people who actively seek 
surgery even in the face of sound medical opposition. The experience itself, the hospitalization and 
surgery, brings its own advantages. The internal psychological advantage comes from having the 
body mutilated; the external psychological advantage lies in the avoidance of all intimacies and 
responsibilities except complete surrender to the surgeon. The biological advantages are typified by 


nursing care. The internal social advantages come from the medical and nursing staff, and from 
other patients. After the patient's discharge the external social advantages are gained by provoking 
sympathy and awe. In its extreme form this game is played professionally by fraudulent or 
determined liability and malpractice claimants, who may earn a living by deliberately or 
opportunistically incurring disabilities. They then demand not only sympathy, as amateur players 
do, but indemnification. "Ain't It Awful" becomes a game, then, when the player overtly expresses 
distress, but is covertly gratified at the prospect of the satisfactions he can wring from his 
In general, people who suffer misfortunes may be divided into three classes. 

1. Those in whom the suffering is inadvertent and unwanted. These may or may not exploit the 
sympathy which is so readily offered to them. Some exploitation is natural enough, and may be 
treated with common courtesy. 

2. Those in whom the suffering is inadvertent, but is gratefully received because of the 
opportunities for exploitation it offers. Here the game is an afterthought, a "secondary gain" in 
Freud's sense. 

3. Those who seek suffering, like polysurgery addicts who go from one surgeon to another until 
they find one willing to operate. Here the game is the primary consideration. 


Thesis. This game is the source of a large percentage of petty dissension in everyday life; it is 
played from the depressive Child position "I am no good," which is protectively transformed into 
the Parental position "They are no good." The player's transactional problem is, then, to prove the 
latter thesis. Hence "Blemish" players do not feel comfortable with a new person until they have 
found his blemish. In its hardest form it may become a totalitarian political game played by 
"authoritarian" personalities, and then it may have serious historical repercussions. Here its close 
relationship with "Nowadays" is evident. In suburban society positive reassurance is obtained from 
playing "How'm I Doing?" while "Blemish" provides negative reassurance. A partial analysis will 
make some of the elements of this game clearer. 

The premise may range from the most trivial and extraneous ("Last year's hat"), to the most cynical 
("Hasn't got $7,000 in the bank"), sinister ("Not 100% Aryan"), esoteric ("Hasn't read Rilke"), 
intimate ("Can't hold his erection") or sophisticated ("What's he trying to prove?"). 
Psychodynamically it is usually based on sexual insecurity, and its aim is reassurance. 
Transactionally there is prying, morbid curiosity or watchfulness, sometimes with Parental or Adult 
concern charitably masking the Child's relish. It has the internal psychological advantage of 
warding off depression, and the external psychological advantage of avoiding the intimacy which 
might expose White's own blemishes. White feels justified in turning away an unfashionable 
woman, a man without financial backing, a non- Aryan, an illiterate, an impotent man or' an 
insecure personality. At the same time the prying offers some internal social action with biological 
gain. The external social advantage is of the "Ain't It Awful" family — Neighborly Type. 
An interesting sidelight is that White's choice of premise is independent of his intellectual capacity 
or apparent sophistication. Thus a man who had held some responsible positions in the foreign 
service of his country told an audience that another country was inferior because, among other 
things, the men wore jackets with sleeves that were too long. In his Adult ego state this man was 
quite competent. Only when playing a Parental game like "Blemish" would he mention such 


Thesis. The term "schlemiel" does not refer to the hero of Chamisso's novel, who was a man 
without a shadow, but to a popular Yiddish word allied to the German and Dutch words for cunning. 


The Schlemiel's victim, who is something like the "Good-Natured Fellow" of Paul de Kock, is 

colloquially called the Schlemazl. The moves in a typical game of "Schlemiel" are as follows: 

1W. White spills a highball on the hostess's evening gown. 

IB. Black (the host) responds initially with rage, but he senses (often only vaguely) that if he shows 

it, White wins. Black therefore pulls himself together, and this gives him the illusion that he wins. 

2W. White says: "I'm sorry." 

2B. Black mutters or cries forgiveness, strengthening his illusion that he wins. 

3W. White then proceeds to inflict other damage on Black's property. He breaks things, spills 

things and makes messes of various kinds. After the cigarette burn in the tablecloth, the chair leg 

through the lace curtain and the gravy on the rug, White's Child is exhilarated because he has 

enjoyed himself in carrying out these procedures, for all of which he has been forgiven, while 

Black has made a gratifying display of suffering self-control. Thus both of them profit from an 

unfortunate situation, and Black is not necessarily anxious to terminate the friendship. 

As in most games, White, who makes the first move, wins either way. If Black shows his anger, 

White can feel justified in returning the resentment. If Black restrains himself, White can go on 

enjoying his opportunities. The real payoff in this game, however, is not the pleasure of 

destructiveness, which is merely an added bonus for White, but the fact that he obtains forgiveness. 

This leads directly into the antithesis. 

Antithesis. Anti-" Schlemiel" is played by not offering the demanded absolution. After White says, 

"I'm sorry," Black, instead of muttering "It's okay," says, "Tonight you can embarrass my wife, ruin 

the furniture and wreck the rug, but please don't say Tm sorry.'" Here Black switches from being a 

Forgiving Parent to being an objective Adult who takes the full responsibility for having invited 

White in the first place. 

The intensity of White's game will be revealed by his reaction, which may be quite explosive. One 

who plays anti-" Schlemiel" runs the risk of immediate reprisals or, at any rate, of making an enemy. 

Children play "Schlemiel" in an abortive form in which they are not always sure of forgiveness but 

at least have the pleasure of making messes; as they learn to comport themselves socially, however, 

they may take advantage of their increasing sophistication to obtain the forgiveness which is the 

chief goal of the game as played in polite, grown-up social circles. 


Thesis: I can he destructive and still get forgiveness. 

Aim: Absolution. 

Roles: Aggressor, Victim (Colloquially, Schlemiel and Schlemazl). 

Dynamics: Anal aggression. 

Examples: (1) Messily destructive children. (2) Clumsy guest. 

Social Paradigm: Adult-Adult. 

Adult: "Since I'm polite, you have to be polite, too." Adult: "That's fine. I forgive you." 

Psychological Paradigm: Child-Parent. 

*The examples given for this and the next game (YDYB) follow those given previously by the 

author in Transactions! Analysis. 

Child: "You have to forgive things which appear accidental." 

Parent: "You are right. I have to show you what good manners are." 

Moves: (1) Provocation-resentment. (2) Apology-forgiveness. 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — pleasure of messing. (2) External Psychological — Avoids 

punishment. (3) Internal Social — "Schlemiel." (4) External Social — "Schlemiel." (5) Biological — 

provocative and gentle stroking. (6) Existential — I am blameless. 


Thesis. "Why Don't You — Yes But" occupies a special place in game analysis, because it was the 
original stimulus for the concept of games. It was the first game to be dissected out of its social 


context, and since it is the oldest subject of game analysis, it is one of the best understood. It is also 

the game most commonly played at parties and groups of all kinds, including psychotherapy groups. 

The following example will serve to illustrate its main characteristics: 

White: "My husband always insists on doing our own repairs, and he never builds anything right." 

Black: "Why doesn't he take a course in carpentry?" White: "Yes, but he doesn't have time." Blue: 

"Why don't you buy him some good tools'?" White: "Yes, but he doesn't know how to use them." 

Red: "Why don't you have your building done by a carpenter?" 

White: "Yes, but that would cost too much." Brown: "Why don't you just accept what he does the 

way he does it}" 

White: "Yes, but the whole thing might fall down." 

Such an exchange is typically followed by a silence. It is eventually broken by Green, who may say 

something like, "That's men for you, always trying to show how efficient they are." 

YDYB can be played by any number. The agent presents a problem. The others start to present 

solutions, each beginning with "Why don't you . . . ?" To each of these White objects with a "Yes, 

but. ..." A good player can stand off the others indefinitely until they all give up, whereupon White 

wins. In many situations she might have to handle a dozen or more solutions to engineer the 

crestfallen silence which signifies her victory, and which leaves the field open for the next game in 

the above paradigm, Green switching into "PI A," Delinquent Husband Type. 

Since the solutions are, with rare exceptions, rejected, it is apparent that this game must serve some 

ulterior purpose. YDYB is not played for its ostensible purpose (an Adult quest for information or 

solutions), but to reassure and gratify the Child. A bare transcript may sound Adult, but in the 

living tissue it can be observed that White presents herself as a Child inadequate to meet the 

situation; whereupon the others become transformed into sage Parents anxious to dispense their 

wisdom for her benefit. 

PsychologicarLeveJ - ' 

Social Level 

White R: "Yes. but..." 
Others S: "Why don't you..." 

< FIGURE 8 > Why Don't You-Yes But 

This is illustrated in Figure 8. The game can proceed because at the social level both stimulus and 
response are Adult to Adult, and at the psychological level they are also complementary, with 
Parent to Child stimulus ("Why don't you. . . •") eliciting Child to Parent response ("Yes, but. . . .")• 
The psychological level is usually unconscious on both sides, but the shifts in ego state (Adult to 
"inadequate" Child on White's part. Adult to "wise" Parent by the others) can often be detected by 
an alert observer from changes in posture, muscular tone, voice and vocabulary. 
In order to illustrate the implications, it is instructive to follow through on the example given above. 
Therapist: "Did anyone suggest anything you hadn't thought of yourself?" 


White: "No, they didn't. As a matter of fact, I've actually tried almost everything they suggested. I 
did buy my husband some tools, and he did take a course in carpentry." 

Here White demonstrates two of the reasons why the proceedings should not be taken at face value. 
First, in the majority of cases White is as intelligent as anyone else in the company, and it is very 
unlikely that others will suggest any solution that she has not thought of herself. If someone does 
happen to come up with an original suggestion, White will accept it gratefully if she is playing fair; 
that is, her "inadequate" Child will give way if anyone present has an idea ingenious enough to 
stimulate her Adult. But habitual YDYB players, such as White above, seldom play fair. On the 
other hand, a too ready acceptance of suggestions raises the question of whether the YDYB is not 
masking an underlying game of "Stupid." 

The example given is particularly dramatic, because it clearly illustrates the second point. Even if 
White has actually tried some of the solutions presented, she will still object to them. The purpose 
of the game is not to get suggestions, but to reject them. 

While almost anyone will play this game under proper circumstances because of its time- 
structuring value, careful study of individuals who particularly favor it reveals several interesting 
features. First, they characteristically can and will play either side of the game with equal facility. 
This switchability of roles is true of all games. Players may habitually prefer one role to another, 
but they are capable of trading, and they are willing to play any other role in the same game, if for 
some reason that is indicated. (Compare, for example, the switch from Drinker to Rescuer in the 
game of "Alcoholic") 

Second, in clinical practice it is found that people who favor YDYB belong to that class of patients 
who eventually request hypnosis or some sort of hypnotic injection as a method of speeding up 
their treatment. When they are playing the game, their object is to demonstrate that no one can give 
them an acceptable suggestion — that is, they will never surrender: whereas with the therapist, they 
request a procedure which will put them in a state of complete surrender. It is thus apparent that 
YDYB represents a social solution to a conflict about surrender. 

Even more specifically, this game is common among people who have a fear of blushing, as die 
following therapeutic exchange demonstrates: 

Therapist: "Why do you play 'Why Don't You — Yes But' if you know it's a con?" 
White: "If I'm talking to somebody I have to keep thinking of things to say. If I don't, I'll blush. 
Except in the dark. I can't stand a lull. I know it, and my husband knows it, too. He's always told 
me that." 

Therapist: "You mean if your Adult doesn't keep busy, your Child takes the chance to pop up and 
make you feel embarrassed?" 

White: "That's it. So if I can keep making suggestions to somebody, or get him to make suggestions 
to me, then I'm all right, I'm protected. As long as I can keep my Adult in control, I can postpone 
the embarrassment." 

Here White indicates clearly that she fears unstructured time. Her Child is prevented from 
advertising as long as the Adult can be kept busy in a social situation, and a game offers a suitable 
structure for Adult functioning. But the game must be suitably motivated in order to maintain her 
interest. Her choice of YDYB is influenced by the principle of economy: it yields die maximum 
internal and external advantages to her Child's conflicts about physical passivity. She could play 
with equal zest either die shrewd Child who cannot be dominated or the sage Parent who tries to 
dominate the Child in someone else, but fails. Since the basic principle of YDYB is that no 
suggestion is ever accepted, the Parent is never successful. The motto of the game is: "Don't get 
panicky, the Parent never succeeds." 

In summary, then: while each move is amusing, so to speak, to White, and brings its own little 
pleasure in rejecting the suggestion, the real payoff is the silence or masked silence which ensues 
when all the others have racked their brains and grown tired of trying to think of acceptable 
solutions. This signifies to White and to them that she has won by demonstrating it is they who are 
inadequate. If the silence is not masked, it may persist for several minutes. In the paradigm, Green 
cut White's triumph short because of her eagerness to start a game of her own, and that was what 


kept her from participating in White's game. Later on in the session, White demonstrated her 
resentment against Green for having abridged her moment of victory. 

Another curious feature of YDYB is that the external and internal games are played exactly the 
same way, with die roles reversed. In the external form, the one observed clinically, White's Child 
comes out to play the role of the inadequate helpseeker in a many-handed situation. In the 
internal form, the more intimate two-handed game played at home with her husband, her Parent 
comes out as the wise, efficient suggestion-giver, This reversal is usually secondary, however, 
since during the courtship she plays the helpless Child side, and only after the honeymoon is over 
does her bossy Parent begin to emerge into the open. There may have been slips as the wedding 
approached, but her fiance will overlook these in his eagerness to settie down with his carefully 
chosen bride. If he does not overlook them, the engagement may be called off for "good reasons," 
and White, sadder but no wiser, will resume her search for a suitable mate. 
Antithesis. It is evident that those who respond to White's first move, the presentation of her 
"problem," are playing a form of "I'm Only Trying to Help You" (ITHY). In fact YDYB is the 
inverse of ITHY. In ITHY there is one therapist and many clients: in YDYB one client and many 
"therapists." The clinical antithesis to YDYB, therefore, is not to play ITHY. If the opening is of 
the form: "What do you do if . . ." (WYDI), a suggested response is: "That is a difficult problem. 
What are you going to do about it?" If it is of the form: "X didn't work out properly," the response 
then should be "That is too bad." Both of these are polite enough to leave White at a loss, or at least 
to elicit a crossed transaction, so that his frustration becomes manifest and can then be explored. In 
a therapy group it is good practice for susceptible patients to refrain from playing ITHY when 
invited. Then not only White, but the other members as well, can learn from anti-YDYB, which is 
merely the other side of anti-ITHY. 

In a social situation, if the game is friendly and harmless, there is no reason not to participate. If it 
is an attempt to exploit professional knowledge, an antithetical move may be required; but in such 
situations this arouses resentment because of the exposure of White's Child. The best policy under 
those circumstances is to flee from the opening move and look for a stimulating game of first- 
degree "Rapo." 

Relatives. "Why Don't You — Yes But" must be distinguished from its obverse, "Why Did You — 
No But" (YDNB), in which it is the Parent who wins and the defensive Child who eventually 
retires in confusion, although again the bare transcript may sound factual, rational and Adult to 
Adult. YDNB is closely related to "Furthermore." 

The reverse of YDYB at first resembles "Peasant." Here White seduces the therapist into giving her 
suggestions which she immediately accepts, rather than rejects. Only after he is deeply involved 
does he perceive that White is aiming on him. What looked like "Peasant" ends up as a game of 
intellectual "Rapo." The classical version of this is the switch from positive to negative transference 
in the course of orthodox psychoanalysis. 

YDYB may also be played in a second-degree hard form as "Do Me Something." The patient 
refuses to do the housework, for example, and there is a game of YDYB every evening when the 
husband returns home. But no matter what he says, she sullenly refuses to change her ways. In 
some cases the sullenness may be malignant and require careful psychiatric evaluation. The game 
aspect must be considered as well, however, since it raises the question of why the husband 
selected such a spouse, and how he contributes to maintaining the situation. 


Thesis: See if you can present a solution I can't find fault with. 

Aim: Reassurance. Roles: Helpless person, Advisers. Dynamics: Surrender conflict (oral). 

Examples: (1) Yes, but I can't do my homework now because. ... (2) Helpless wife. Social 

Paradigm: Adult-Adult. 

Adult: "What do you do if. . . ." Adult: "Why don't you " 

Adult: "Yes, but. . . ." Psychological Paradigm: Parent-Child. 

Parent: "I can make you grateful for my help." Child: "Go ahead and try." 


Moves: CO Problem-Solution. (2) Objection-Solution. (3) Objection-Disconcertion. 
Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — reassurance. (2) External Psychological — avoids 
surrender. (3) Internal Social- YD YB, Parental role. (4) External Social- YD YB, Child role, (5) 
Biological — rational discussion. (6) Existential — Everybody wants to dominate me. 


1. von Chamisso, Adalbert. Peter Schlemihl. David McKay & Company, Philadelphia, J929. 

2. de Rock, Paul. One of the most popular works of this nineteenth-century librettist and novelist is 
A Good-Natured Fellow, about a man who gives away too much. 


Sexual Games 

SOME games are played to exploit or fight off sexual impulses. These are all, in effect, perversions 
of the sexual instincts in which the satisfaction is displaced from the sexual act to the crucial 
transactions which constitute die payoff of the game. This cannot always be demonstrated 
convincingly, because such games are usually played in privacy, so that clinical information about 
them has to be obtained secondhand, and the informant's bias cannot always be satisfactorily 
evaluated. The psychiatric conception of homosexuality, for example, is heavily skewed, because 
the more aggressive and successful "players" do not often come for psychiatric treatment, and die 
available material mostly concerns the passive partners. 

The games included here are: "Let's You and Him Fight," "Perversion," "Rapo," "Stocking Game" 
and "Uproar," In most cases, the agent is a woman. This is because the hard forms of sexual games 
in which' the man is the agent verge on or constitute criminality, and properly belong in the 
Underworld section. On the other side, sexual games and marital games overlap, but the ones 
described here are readily available to unmarried people as well as to spouses. 


Thesis. This may be a maneuver, a ritual or a game. In each case the psychology is essentially 
feminine. Because of its dramatic qualities, LYAHF is the basis of much of the world's literature, 
both good and bad. 

1. As a maneuver it is romantic. The woman maneuvers or challenges two men into fighting, with 
the implication or promise that she will surrender herself to the winner, 

After the competition is decided, she fulfills her bargain. This is an honest transaction, and the 
presumption is that she and her mate live happily ever after. 

2. As a ritual, it tends to be tragic. Custom demands that the two men fight for her, even if she does 
not want them to, and even if she has already made her choice. If the wrong man wins, she must 
nevertheless take him. In this case it is society and not the woman who sets up LYAHF. If she is 
willing, the transaction is an honest one. If she is unwilling or disappointed, the outcome may offer 
her considerable scope for playing games, such as "Let's Pull A Fast One on Joey." 

3. As a game it is comic. The woman sets up the competition, and while the two men are fighting, 
she decamps with a third. The internal and external psychological advantages for her and her mate 
are derived from the position that honest competition is for suckers, and the comic story they have 
lived through forms the basis for the internal and external social advantages. 


Thesis. Heterosexual perversions such as fetishism, sadism and masochism are symptomatic of a 
confused Child and are treated accordingly. Their transactional aspects, however, as manifested m 
actual sexual situations, can be dealt with by means of game analysis. This may lead to social 
control, so that even if the warped sexual impulses remain unchanged, they are neutralized as far as 
actual indulgence is concerned. 

People who are suffering from mild sadistic or masochistic distortions tend to take a primitive kind 
of Mental Health position. They feel that they are strongly sexed, and that prolonged abstinence 
will lead to serious consequences. Neither of these conclusions is necessarily true, but they form 
the basis for a game of "Wooden Leg" with the plea: "What do you expect from someone as 
strongly sexed as I am?" 

Antithesis. To extend ordinary courtesy to oneself and one's partner; dial is, to refrain from verbal 
or physical flagellation and confine oneself to more conventional forms of coitus. If White is a true 
pervert, this will lay bare the second element of the game, which is often clearly expressed in his 
dreams: that coitus itself has little interest For him, and that his real satisfaction is derived from the 


humiliating foreplay. This is something that he may not have cared to admit to himself. But it will 
now become clear to him that his complaint is: "After all this work, I have to have intercourse, 
yet!" At this point the position is much more favorable for specific psychotherapy, and much of the 
pleading and evasiveness has been nullified. This applies to ordinary "sexual psychopaths" as seen 
in practice, and not to malignant schizophrenic or criminal perversions, nor to those who confine 
their sexual activities to fantasy. 

The game of "Homosexuality" has become elaborated into a subculture in many countries, just as it 
is ritualized in others. Many of the disabilities which result from homosexuality arise from making 
it into a game. The provocative behavior which gives rise to "Cops and Robbers," "Why Does This 
Always Happen to Us," "It's the Society We Live In," "AH Great Men Were" and so forth, is often 
amenable to social control, which reduces the handicaps to a minimum. The "professional 
homosexual" wastes a large amount of time and energy which could be applied to other ends. 
Analysis of his games may help him establish a quiet manage which will leave him free to enjoy 
the benefits that bourgeois society offers, instead of devoting himself to playing his own variation 
of "Ain't It Awful!" 


Thesis. This is a game played between a man and a woman which might more politely be called, in 
the milder forms at least, "Kiss Off" or "Indignation." It may be played with varying degrees of 

1. First-Degree "Rapo," or "Kiss Off," is popular at social gatherings and consists essentially of 
mild flirtation. White signals that she is available and gets her pleasure from the man's pursuit. As 
soon as he has committed himself, the game is over. If she is polite, she may say quite frankly "I 
appreciate your compliments and thank you very much," and move on to the next conquest. If she 
is less generous, she may simply leave him. A skillful player can make this game last for a long 
time at a large social gathering by moving around frequently, so that the man has to carry out 
complicated maneuvers in order to follow her without being too obvious. 

2. In Second-Degree "Rapo," or "Indignation," White gets only secondary satisfaction from Black's 
advances. Her primary gratification comes from rejecting him, so that this game is also colloquially 
known as "Buzz Off, Buster." She leads Black into a much more serious commitment than the mild 
flirtation of First-Degree "Rapo" and enjoys watching his discomfiture when she repulses him. 
Black, of course, is not as helpless as he seems, and may have gone to considerable trouble to get 
himself involved. Usually he is playing some variation of "Kick Me." 

3. Third-Degree "Rapo" is a vicious game which ends in murder, suicide or the courtroom. Here 
White leads Black into compromising physical contact and then claims that he has made a criminal 
assault or has done her irreparable damage. In its most cynical form White may actually allow him 
to complete the sexual act so that she gets that enjoyment before confronting him. The 
confrontation may be immediate, as in the illegitimate cry of rape, or it may be long delayed, as in 
suicide or homicide following a prolonged love affair. If she chooses to play it as a criminal assault, 
she may have no difficulty in finding mercenary or morbidly interested allies, such as the press, the 
police, counselors and relatives. Sometimes, however, these outsiders may cynically turn on her, so 
that she loses the initiative and becomes a tool in their games. 

In some cases outsiders perform a different function. 

They force the game on an unwilling White because they want to play "Let's You and Him Fight." 

They put her in such a position that in order to save her face or her reputation she has to cry rape. 

This is particularly apt to happen with girls under the legal age of consent; they may be quite 

willing to continue a liaison, but because it is discovered or made an issue of, they feel constrained 

to turn the romance into a game of Third-Degree "Rapo." 

In one well-known situation, the wary Joseph refused to be inveigled into a game of "Rapo," 

whereupon Potiphar's wife made the classical switch into "Let's You and Him Fight," an excellent 

example of the way a hard player reacts to antithesis, and of the dangers that beset people who 


refuse to play games, These two games are combined in the well-known "Badger Game," in which 
the woman seduces Black and then cries rape, at which point her husband takes charge and abuses 
Black for purposes of blackmail. 

One of the most unfortunate and acute forms of Third-Degree "Rapo" occurs relatively frequently 
between homosexual strangers, who in a matter of an hour or so may bring the game to a point of 
homicide. The cynical and criminal variations of this game contribute a large volume to sensational 
newspaper copy. 

The childhood prototype of "Rapo" is the same as that of "Frigid Woman," in which the little girl 
induces the boy to humiliate himself or get dirty and then sneers at him, as classically described by 
Maugham in Of Hitman Bondage and, as already noted, by Dickens in Great Expectations. This is 
Second Degree. A harder form, approaching Third Degree, may be played in tough neighborhoods. 
Antithesis. The man's ability to avoid becoming involved in this game or to keep it under control 
depends on his capacity to distinguish genuine expressions of feeling from moves in the game. If he 
is thus able to exert social control, he may obtain a great deal of pleasure from the mild flirtations 
of "Kiss Off." On the other hand it is difficult to conceive of a safe antithesis for the Potiphar's 
Wife maneuver, other than checking out before closing time with no forwarding address. In 1938 
the writer met an aging Joseph in Aleppo who had checked out of Constantinople thirty-two years 
previously, after one of the Sultan's ladies had cornered him during a business visit to the Yildiz 
harem. He had to abandon his shop, but took time to pick up his hoard of gold francs, and had 
never returned. 

Relatives. The male versions of "Rapo" are notoriously found in commercial situations: "Casting 
Couch" (and then she didn't get the part) and "Cuddle Up" (and then she got fired). 


The following analysis refers to Third-Degree "Rapo" because there the elements of the game are 

more dramatically illustrated. 

Aim: Malicious revenge. Roles: Seductress, Wolf. 

Dynamics (Third Degree): Penis envy, oral violence. "Kiss Off" is phallic, while "Indignation" has 

strong anal elements. 

Examples: (1) I'll tell on you, you dirty little boy. (2) Wronged woman. 

Social Paradigm: Adult-Adult. 

Adult (male): "I'm sorry if I went further than you intended me to." 

Adult (female) "You have violated me and must pay the full penalty." 

Psychological Paradigm: Child-Child. 

Child (male): "See how irresistible I am." Child (female): "Now I've got you, you son of a bitch." 

Moves: (1) Female: seduction; Male: counter-seduction. (2) Female: surrender; Male: victory. (3) 

Female: confrontation; Male: collapse. 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — expression of 

hatred and projection of guilt. (2) External Psychological-avoidance of emotional sexual intimacy. 

(3) Internal Social -"Now I've Got You, You Son of a Bitch." (4) External Social-'Ain't It Awful," 

"Courtroom," "Let's You and Him Fight." (5) Biological — sexual and belligerent exchanges. (6) 

Existential-I am blameless. 


Thesis. This is a game of the "Rapo" family; in it the most obvious characteristic is the 
exhibitionism, which is hysterical in nature. A woman comes into a strange group and after a very 
short time raises her leg, exposing herself in a provocative way, and remarks, "Oh my, I have a run 
in my stocking." This is calculated to arouse the men sexually and to make the other women angry. 
Any confrontation of White is met, of course, with protestations of innocence or counter- 
accusations, hence the resemblance to classical "Rapo." What is significant is White's lack of 
adaptation. She seldom waits to find out what kind of people she is dealing with or how to time her 


maneuver. Hence it stands out as inappropriate and affects her relationships with her associates. In 
spite of some superficial "sophistication," she fails to understand what happens to her in life 
because her judgment of human nature is too cynical. The aim is to prove that other people have 
lascivious minds, and her Adult is conned by her Child and her Parent (usually a lascivious mother) 
into ignoring both her own provocative-ness and the good sense of many of the people she meets. 
Thus the game tends to be self-destructive. 

This is probably a phallic variant of a game whose content depends on the underlying disturbance. 
An "oral" variant may be exhibited by women with deeper pathology and well-developed breasts. 
Such women often sit with their hands behind their heads so as to thrust their breasts forward; they 
may draw additional attention to them by remarking about their size or some pathology such as an 
operation or a lump. Some types of squirming probably constitute an anal variant. The implication 
of this game is that the woman is sexually available. Thus it may be played in a more symbolic 
form by bereaved women who "exhibit" their widowhood insincerely. 

Antithesis. Along with the poor adaptation, these women show little tolerance for antithesis. If the 
game is ignored or countered by a sophisticated therapy group, for example, they may not return. 
Antithesis must be carefully distinguished in this game from reprisal, since the latter signifies that 
White has won. Women are more skillful at counter-moves in "Stocking Game" than men, who 
indeed have little incentive to break up this game. Antithesis, therefore, is best left to the discretion 
of the other women present. 


Thesis. The classical game is played between domineering fathers and teen-age daughters, where 
there is a sexually inhibited mother. Father comes home from work and finds fault with daughter, 
who answers impudently; or daughter may make the first move by being impudent, whereupon 
father finds Fault. Their voices rise, and the clash becomes more acute. The outcome depends on 
who has the initiative. There are three possibilities; (a) father retires to his bedroom and slams the 
door (b) daughter retires to her bedroom and slams the door (c) both retire to their respective 
bedrooms and slam the doors. In any case, the end of a game of "Uproar" is marked by a slamming 
door. "Uproar" offers a distressing but effective solution to the sexual problems that arise between 
fathers and teen-age daughters in certain households. Often they can only live in the same house 
together if they are angry at each other, and the slamming doors emphasize for each of them the 
fact that they have separate bedrooms. 

In degenerate households this game may be played in a sinister and repellent form in which father 
waits up for daughter whenever she goes out on a date, and examines her and her clodiing carefully 
on her return to make sure that she has not had intercourse. The slightest suspicious circumstance 
may give rise to the most violent altercation, which may end with the daughter being expelled from 
the house in the middle of the night. In the long run nature will take its course — if not that night 
then the next, or the one after. Then the father's suspicions are "justified," as he makes plain to the 
mother, who has stood by "helplessly" while all this went on. 

In general, however, "Uproar" may be played between any two people who are trying to avoid 
sexual intimacy. For example, it is a common terminal phase of "Frigid Woman." It is relatively 
rare between teen-age boys and their female relatives, because it is easier for teen-age boys to 
escape from the house in the evening than for other members of the family. At an earlier age 
brothers and sisters can set up effective barriers and partial satisfactions through physical combat, a 
pattern which has various motivations at different ages, and which in America is a semi-ritualistic 
form of "Uproar" sanctioned by television, pedagogic and pediatric authorities. In upper-class 
England it is (or was) considered bad form, and the corresponding energies are channeled into the 
well-regulated "Uproar" of the playing fields. 

Antithesis. The game is not as distasteful to the father as he might like to think, and it is generally 
the daughter who makes the antithetical move through an early, often premature or forced marriage. 
If it is psychologically possible, the mother can make the antithetical move by relinquishing her 


relative or absolute frigidity. The game may subside if the father finds an outside sexual interest, 
but that may lead to other complications. In die case of married couples, the antitheses are the same 
as for "Frigid Woman" or "Frigid Man." 
Under appropriate circumstances "Uproar" leads quite naturally into "Courtroom." 


Underworld Games 

WITH the infiltration of the "helping" professions into the courts, probation departments and 
correctional facilities, and with the increasing sophistication o£ criminologists and law enforcement 
officers, those concerned should be aware of the more common games prevalent in the underworld, 
both in prison and out of it. These include "Cops and Robbers," "How Do You Get Out of Here" 
and "Let's Pull a Fast One on Joey." 


Thesis. Because many criminals are cop-haters, they seem to get as much satisfaction from 
outwitting the police as from their criminal gains, often more. Their crimes, at the Adult level, are 
games played for the material rewards, the take; but at the Child level it is the thrill of the chase: 
the getaway and the cool-off. 

Curiously enough, the childhood prototype of "Cops and Robbers" is not cops and robbers but hide- 
and-seek, in which the essential element is the chagrin of being found. Younger children readily 
betray this. If father finds them too easily, the chagrin is there without much fun. But father, if he is 
a good player, knows what to do; he holds off, whereupon the little boy gives him a clue by calling 
out, dropping something or banging. Thus he forces father to find him, but still shows chagrin; this 
time he has had more fun because of the increased suspense. If father gives up, the boy usually 
feels disappointed rather than victorious. Since the fun of being hidden was there, evidently that is 
not where the trouble lies, What he is disappointed about is not being caught. When his turn comes 
to hide, father knows he is not supposed to outwit the little boy for very one just enough to make it 
fun; and he is wise enough to look chagrined when he is caught. It soon becomes clear that being 
found is the necessary payoff. 

Hence hide-and-seek is not a mere pastime but a true game At the social level it is a battle of wits, 
and is most satisfying when the Adult of each player does his best; at the psychological level, 
however, it is set up like compulsive gambling, in which White's Adult has to lose in order for his 
Child to win. Not being caught is actually the antithesis. Among older children, one who finds an 
insoluble hiding place is regarded as not being a good sport, since he has spoiled the game, He has 
eliminated the Child element and turned the whole thing into an Adult procedure. He is no longer 
playing for fun. He is in the same class as the owner of a casino, or some professional criminals, 
who are really out for money rather than sport. 

There seem to be two distinctive types of habitual criminals: those who are in crime primarily for 
profit, and those who are in it primarily for the game — with a large group in between who can 
handle it either way. The "compulsive winner," the big money-maker whose Child really does not 
want to be caught, rarely is, according to reports; he is an untouchable, for whom the fix is always 
in. The "compulsive loser," on the other hand, who is playing "Cops and Robbers" (C&R), seldom 
does very well financially. The exceptions to this often seem to be due to luck rather than skill; in 
the long run even the lucky ones usually end up as their Child requires, squawking rather than 
riding high. 

The C&R player, with whom we are concerned here, in some ways resembles, the Alcoholic. He 
can shift roles from Robber to Cop and from' Cop to Robber. In some cases he may play the 
Parental Cop during the day and the Child Robber after dark. There is a Cop in many Robbers, and 
a Robber in many Cops. If the criminal "reforms," he may play the role of Rescuer, becoming a 
social worker or a mission worker; but the Rescuer is Far less important in this game than in 
"Alcoholic." Ordinarily, however, the player's role as Robber is his destiny, and each has his own 
modus operandi for getting caught. He may make it tough or easy for the Cops. 
The situation is similar with gamblers. At the social or sociological level a "professional" gambler 
is one whose chief interest in life is gambling. But at the psychological level there are two different 
kinds of people who are professional gamblers. There are those who spend their time gaming, i.e., 


playing with Fate, in whom the strength of the Adult's desire to win is exceeded only by the 
strength of the Child's need to lose. Then there are those who run gambling houses and actually do 
earn a living, usually a very good one, by providing opportunities for gamesters to play; they 
themselves are not playing, and try to avoid playing, although occasionally under certain conditions 
they will indulge themselves and enjoy it, just as a straight criminal may occasionally play a game 

This throws light on why sociological and psychological studies of criminals have been generally 
ambiguous and unproductive: they are dealing with two different kinds of people who cannot be 
adequately differentiated in the ordinary theoretical or empirical frameworks. The same is true in 
studying gamblers. Transactional and game analyses offer an immediate solution for this. They 
remove the ambiguity by distinguishing transactionally, below the social level, between "players" 
and "straight professionals." 

Let us now turn from this general thesis to consider specific examples. Some burglars do their jobs 
without any waste motion. The "Cops and Robbers" burglar leaves his calling card in gratuitous 
acts of vandalism, such as spoiling valuable clothing with secretions and excretions. The straight 
bank robber, according to reports, takes every possible precaution to avoid violence; the C&R bank 
robber is only looking for an excuse to vent his anger. Like any professional, a straight criminal 
likes his jobs to be as clean as circumstances permit. The C&R criminal is compelled to blow off 
steam in the course of his work. The true professional is said never to operate until the fix is in; the 
player is willing to take on the law barehanded. Straight professionals are well aware, in their own 
way, of the game of C&R. If a gang member shows too much interest in the game, to the point of 
jeopardizing the job, and particularly if his need to be caught begins to show, they will take drastic 
measures to prevent a recurrence. Perhaps it is just because straight professionals are not playing 
C&R that they are so seldom caught, and hence so rarely studied sociologically, psychologically 
and psychiatrically; and this also applies to gamblers. Hence most of our clinical knowledge about 
criminals and gamblers refers to players rather than to straight professionals. 
Kleptomaniacs (as opposed to professional shoplifters) are examples of how widely trivial C&R is 
played. It is probable that a very large percentage of Occidentals, at least, have played C&R in 
fantasy, and that is what sells newspapers in our half of the world. This fantasy frequently occurs in 
the form of dreaming up the "perfect murder," which is playing the hardest possible game and 
completely outwitting the cops. 

Variations of C&R are "Auditors and Robbers," played by embezzlers with the same rules and the 
same payoff; Customs and Robbers," played by smugglers; etc. Of special interest is the criminal 
variation of "Courtroom." Despite all his precautions, the professional may occasionally be arrested 
and brought to trial. For him "Courtroom" is a procedure, which he carries out according to the 
instructions of his legal advisers. For the lawyers, if they are compulsive winners, "Courtroom" is 
essentially a game played with the jury in which the object is to win, not lose, and this is regarded 
as a constructive game by a large segment of society. 

Antithesis. This is the concern of qualified criminologists rather than psychiatrists. The police and 
judiciary apparatus are not antithetical, but are playing their roles in the game under the rules set up 
by society. 

One thing should be emphasized, however. Research workers in criminology may joke that some 
criminals behave as though they enjoyed the chase and 'wanted to be caught, or they may read the 
idea and agree in a deferential way. But they show little tendency to consider such an "academic" 
factor as decisive in their "serious" work. For one thing, there is no way to unmask this element 
through the standard methods of psychological research. The investigator must therefore either 
overlook a crucial point because he cannot work it with his research tools, or else change his tools. 
The fact is that those tools have so far not yielded one single solution to any problem in 
criminology. Researchers might therefore be better off discarding the old methods and tackling the 
problem freshly. Until C&R is accepted not merely as an interesting anomaly, but as the very heart 
of the matter in a significant percentage of cases, much research in criminology will continue to 
deal with trivialities, doctrines, peripheral issues or irrelevancies. 



Thesis: See if you can catch me. Aim: Reassurance. Roles: Robber, Cop (Judge). 

Dynamics: Phallic intrusion, e.g. (1) Hide-and-seek, tag. (2) Crime. 

Social Paradigm: Parent-Child. 

Child: "See if you can catch me." Parent: "That's my job." Psychological Paradigm: Parent-Child. 

Child: "You must catch me." Parent: "Aha, there you are." 

Moves: (1) W: Defiance. B: Indignation. (2) W: Concealment. B: Frustration. (3) W: Provocation. 

B: Victory. 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — material indemnification for old wrong. (2) External 

Psychological — counterphobic. (3) Internal Social — See if you can catch me. (4) External Social-I 

almost got away with it. (Pastime: They almost got away with it.) (5) Biological-notoriety. (6) 

Existential: I've always been a loser, 


Thesis. The historical evidence is that those prisoners survive best who have their time structured 
by an activity, a pastime or a game. This is apparently well known to political police, who are said 
to break some prisoners down simply by keeping them inactive and in a state of social deprivation. 
The favored activity of solitary prisoners is reading or writing books, and the favored pastime is 
escape, some of whose practitioners, such as Casanova and Baron Trench, have become famous. 
The favored game is "How Do You Get Out of Herel?" ("Want Out"), which may also be played in 
state hospitals. It must be distinguished from the operation (see p. 48) of the same name, known as 
"Good Behavior." An inmate who really wants to be free will find out how to comply with the 
authorities so as to be released at the earliest possible moment. Nowadays this may often be 
accomplished by playing a good game of "Psychiatry," Group Therapy Type. The game of "Want 
Out," however, is played by inmates or by patients whose Child does not want to get out. They 
simulate "Good Behavior," but at the critical point they sabotage themselves so as not to be 
released. Thus in "Good Behavior" Parent, Adult and Child work together to be discharged; in 
"Want Out" Parent and Adult go through the prescribed motions until the critical moment, when the 
Child, who is actually frightened at the prospect of venturing into the uncertain world, takes over 
and spoils the effect. "Want Out" was common in the late 1930's among recently arrived 
immigrants from Germany who became psychotic. They would improve and beg for release from 
the hospital; but as the day of liberation approached, their psychotic manifestations would recur. 
Antithesis. Both "Good Behavior" and "Want Out" are recognized by alert administrators and can 
be dealt with at die executive level. Beginners in group therapy, however, are often taken in. A 
competent group therapist, knowing these are die most frequent manipulations in psychiatrically 
oriented prisons, will be watching for them and will ferret them out at an early phase. Since "Good 
Behavior" is an honest operation, it may be treated as such, and there is no harm in discussing it 
openly. "Want Out," on the other hand, requires active therapy if the frightened inmate is to be 

Relatives. A close relative of "Want Out" is an operation called "You've Got to Listen." Here the 
inmate of an institution or the client of a social agency demands the right to make complaints. The 
complaints are often irrelevant. His main purpose is to assure himself that he will be listened to by 
the authorities. If they make the mistake of thinking that he expects the complaints to be acted on 
and cut him off as too demanding, there may be trouble. If they accede to his demands, he will 
increase them. If diey merely listen patiently and with signs of interest, the "Got to Listen" player 
will be satisfied and cooperative, and will not ask for anything more. The administrator must learn 
to distinguish "You've Got to Listen" from serious demands for remedial action.2 
"Bum Rap" is another game that belongs in this family. A straight criminal may holler "Bum Rap" 
in a real effort to get out, in which case it is part of the procedure. The inmate who plays "Bum 


Rap" as a game, however, does not use it effectively to try to get out, since if he gets out be will no 
longer have much excuse to holler. 


Thesis. The prototype of this game is "The Big Store," die big-time confidence game, but many 
small gifts and even the badger game are FOOJY. No man can be beaten at FOOJY unless he has 
larceny in his veins, because the first move is for Black to tell White that dumb-honest-old- Joey is 
just waiting to be taken. If White were completely honest, he would either back off or warn Joey, 
but he doesn't. Just as Joey is about to pay off, something goes wrong, and White finds that his 
investment is gone. Or in the badger game, just as Joey is about to be cuckolded, he happens to 
walk in. Then White, who was playing his own rules in his own honest way, finds that he has to 
play Joey's rules, and they hurt. 

Curiously enough, the mark is supposed to know the rules of FOOJY and stick to them. Honest 
squawking is a calculated risk of the con mob; they will not hold that against White, and he is even 
allowed a certain latitude in lying to the police to save his face. But if he goes too far and accuses 
them falsely of burglary, for example, that is cheating, and they resent it. On the other hand, there is 
little sympathy for a con man who gets into trouble by working a mark who is drunk, since this is 
improper procedure, and be should know better. The same applies if he is stupid enough to pick a 
mark with a sense of humor, since it is well known that such people cannot be trusted to play the 
straight man in FOOJY all the way down the line through the terminal game of "Cops and 
Robbers." Experienced con men are scared of marks who laugh after they have been taken. 
It should be noted that a practical joke is not a game of FOOJY, because in a practical joke Joey is 
the one who suffers, while in FOOJY Joey comes out on top, and White is the one who suffers. A 
practical joke is a pastime, while FOOJY is a game in which the joke is arranged to backfire. 
It is evident that FOOJY is a three- or four-handed game, with the police playing the fourth hand, 
and that it is related to "Let's You and Him Fight." 


Thanks are due to Dr. Franklin Ernst of the California Medical Facility at Vacaville, Mr. William 
Collins of the California Rehabilitation Center at Norco, and Mr. Laurence Means of the California 
Institution for Men at Tehachapi, for their continued interest in studying the game of "Cops and 
Robbers" and for their helpful discussions and criticisms. 


1. Frederick Wiseman, in "Psychiatry and the Law: Use and Abuse of Psychiatry in a Murder Case" 
{American Journal of Psychiatry. 118: 289-299, 1961) gives a clear and tragic example of a hard 
form of "Cops and Robbers." It concerns a 23-year-old man who shot his fiancee and then turned 
himself in. This was not easy to arrange, since the police did not believe his story until he had 
repeated it four times. Later, he said: "It just seemed to me that all my life I was bound to end up in 
the chair. If that was the way it was, that was the way it would be." The author says it was farcical 
to expect a lay jury to understand the complex psychiatric testimony that was offered at the trial in 
technical jargon. In game terms, the central issue can be stated in words of no more than two 
syllables: A nine-year-old boy decides (for reasons clearly brought out at the trial) that he is bound 
to end up in the chair. He spends the rest of his life headed toward this goal, and using his girl 
friend as a target, in the end he sets himself up. 

2. For further information about "Cops and Robbers" and games played by prison inmates, see: 
Ernst, F. H. and Keating, W. C, "Psychiatric Treatment of the California Felon." American Journal 
of Psychiatry. 120: 974-979, 1964. 


Consulting Room Games 

GAMES that are tenaciously played in the therapeutic situation are the most important ones for the 
professional game analyst to be aware of. They can be most readily studied first-hand in the 
consulting room. There are three types, according to the role of the agent: 

1. Games played by therapists and case workers: "I'm Only Trying to Help You" and "Psychiatry." 

2. Games played by professionally trained people who ate patients in therapy groups, such as 

3. Games played by lay patients and clients: "Indigence," "Peasant," "Stupid" and "Wooden Leg." 


Thesis. This is a variation of "Psychiatry," which is played hardest by young social scientists, such 
as clinical psychologists. In the company of their colleagues these young people tend to play 
"Psychoanalysis," often in a jocular way, using such expressions as "Your hostility is showing" or 
"How mechanical can a defense mechanism get?" This is usually a harmless and enjoyable pastime; 
it is a normal phase of their learning experience, and with a few originals in the group it can 
become quite amusing. (This writer's preference is, "I see National Parapraxis Week is here again.") 
As patients in psychotherapy groups some of these people are apt to indulge in this mutual critique 
more seriously; but since it is not highly productive in that situation, it may have to be headed off 
by the therapist. The proceedings may then turn into a game of "Greenhouse." 

1 here is a strong tendency for recent graduates to have an exaggerated respect for what they call 
"Genuine Feelings." The expression of such a feeling may be preceded by an announcement that it 
is on its way. After the announcement, the feeling is described, or rather presented before die group, 
as though it were a rare flower which should be regarded with awe. The reactions of die other 
members are received very solemnly, and they take on the air of connoisseurs at a botanical garden. 
The problem seems to be, in the jargon of game analysis, whether this one is good enough to be 
exhibited in the National Feeling Show. A questioning intervention by the therapist may be 
strongly resented, as though be were some clumsy-fingered clod mauling the fragile petals of an 
exotic century plant. The therapist, naturally, feels that in order to understand the anatomy and 
physiology of a flower, it may be necessary to dissect it. 

Antithesis. The antithesis, which is crucial for therapeutic progress, is the irony of the above 
description. If this game is allowed to proceed, it may go on unchanged for years, after which the 
patient may feel that he has had a "therapeutic experience" during which he has "expressed 
hostility" and learned to "face feelings" in a way which gives him an advantage over less fortunate 
colleagues. Meanwhile very little of dynamic significance may have happened, and certainly the 
investment of time has not been used to maximum therapeutic advantage. 

The irony in the initial description is directed not against the patients but against their teachers and 
the cultural milieu which encourages such over-fastidiousness. If properly timed, a skeptical remark 
may successfully divorce them from foppish Parental influences and lead to a less self-conscious 
robustness in their transactions with each other. Instead of cultivating feelings in a kind of hothouse 
atmosphere, they may just let them grow naturally, to be plucked when they are ripe. 
The most obvious advantage of this game is the external psychological, since it avoids intimacy by 
setting up special conditions under which feelings may be expressed, and special restrictions on the 
responses of those present. 


Thesis. This game may be played in any professional situation and is not confined to 
psychotherapists and welfare workers. However, it is found most commonly and in its most florid 
form among social workers with a certain type of training. The analysis of this game was clarified 


for the writer under curious circumstances. All the players at a poker game had folded except two, a 
research psychologist and a businessman. The businessman, who had a high hand, bet; the 
psychologist, who had an unbeatable one, raised. The businessman looked puzzled, whereupon the 
psychologist remarked facetiously: "Don't be upset, I'm only trying to help you!" The businessman 
hesitated, and finally put in his chips. The psychologist showed the winning band, whereupon the 
other threw down his cards in disgust. The others present then felt free to laugh at the psychologist's 
joke, and the loser remarked ruefully: "You sure were helpful!" The psychologist cast a knowing 
glance at the writer, implying that the joke had really been made at the expense of the psychiatric 
profession. It was at that moment that the structure of this game became clear. 
The worker or therapist, of whatever profession, gives some advice to a client or patient. The 
patient returns and reports that the suggestion did not have the desired effect. The worker shrugs off 
this failure with a feeling of resignation, and tries again. If be is more watchful, he may detect at 
this point a twinge of frustration, but he will try again anyway. Usually he feels little need to 
question his own motives, because he knows that many of his similarly trained colleagues do the 
same thing, and that he is following the "correct" procedure and will receive full support from his 

If he runs up against a hard player, such as a hostile obsessional, he will find it more and more 
difficult to avoid feeling inadequate. Then he is in trouble, and the situation will slowly deteriorate. 
In the worst case, he may come up against an angry paranoid who will rush in one day in a rage, 
crying: "Look what you made me do!" Then his frustration will come strongly to the fore in the 
spoken or unspoken thought: "But I was only trying to help you!" His bewilderment at the 
ingratitude may cause him considerable suffering, indicating the complex motives underlying his 
own behavior. This bewilderment is the payoff. 

Legitimate helpers should not be confused with people who play "I'm Only Trying to Help You" 
(ITHY). "I think we can do something about it." "I know what to do," "I was assigned to help you" 
or "My fee for helping you will be. . . ." are different from "I'm only trying to help you." The first 
four, in good faith, represent Adult offers to put professional qualifications at the disposal of the 
distressed patient or client; ITHY has an ulterior motive which is more important than professional 
skill in determining the outcome. This motive is based on the position that people are ungrateful 
and disappointing. The prospect of success is alarming to the Parent of the professional and is an 
invitation to sabotage, because success would threaten the position. The ITHY player needs to be 
reassured that help will not be accepted no matter how strenuously it is offered. The client responds 
with "Look How Hard I'm Trying" or "There's Nothing You Can Do to Help Me." More flexible 
players can compromise: it is all right for people to accept help providing it takes diem a long time 
to do so. Hence therapists tend to feel apologetic for a quick result, since they know that some of 
their colleagues at staff meetings will be critical. At the opposite pole from hard ITHY players, 
such as are found among social workers, are good lawyers who help their clients without personal 
involvement or sentimentality. Here craftsmanship takes the place of covert strenuousness. 
Some schools of social work seem to be primarily academies for the training of professional ITHY 
players, and it is not easy for their graduates to desist from playing it. An example which may help 
to illustrate some of the foregoing points will be found in the description of the complementary 
game "Indigence." 

ITHY and its variants are easy to find in everyday life. It is played by family friends and relatives 
(e.g., "I Can Get It For You Wholesale"), and by adults who do community work with children. It is 
a favorite among parents, and the complementary game played by the offspring is usually "Look 
What You Made Me Do." Socially it may be a variant of "Schlemiel" in which the damage is done 
while being helpful rather than impulsively; here the client is represented by a victim who may be 
playing "Why Does This Always Happen To Me?" or one of its variants. 

Antithesis. There are several devices available for the professional to handle an invitation to play 
this game, and his selection will depend on the state of the relationship between himself and the 
patient, particularly on the attitude of the patient's Child. 


1. The classical psychoanalytic antithesis is the most thoroughgoing and the most difficult for the 
patient to tolerate. The invitation is completely ignored. The patient then tries harder and harder. 
Eventually he falls into a state of despair, manifested by anger or depression, which is the 
characteristic sign that a game has been frustrated. This situation may lead to a useful confrontation. 

2. A more gentle (but not prim) confrontation may be attempted on the first invitation. The therapist 
states that he is the patient's therapist and not his manager. 

3. An even more gentle procedure is to introduce the patient into a therapy group, and let the other 
patients handle it. 

4. With an acutely disturbed patient it may be necessary to play along during the initial phase. 
These patients should be treated by a psychiatrist, who being a medical man, can prescribe both 
medications and some of the hygienic measures which are still valuable, even in this day of 
tranquilizers, in the treatment of such people. If the physician prescribes a hygienic regimen, which 
may include baths, exercise, rest periods, and regular meals along with medication, the patient (1) 
carries out the regimen and feels better C2) carries out the regimen scrupulously and complains that 
it does not help (3) mentions casually that he forgot to carry out the instructions or that he has 
abandoned the regimen because it was not doing any good. In the second and third case it is then up 
to the psychiatrist to decide whether the patient is amenable to game analysis at that point, or 
whether some other form of treatment is indicated to prepare him for later psychotherapy. The 
relationship between the adequacy of die regimen and the patient's tendency to play games with it 
should be carefully evaluated by the psychiatrist before he decides how to proceed next. 

For the patient, on the other hand, the antithesis is, "Don't tell me what to do to help myself, I'll tell 
you what to do to help me." If the therapist is known to be a Schlemiel, the correct antithesis for the 
patient to use is, "Don't help me, help him." But serious players of "I'm Only Trying to Help You" 
are generally lacking in a sense of humor. Antithetical moves on the part of a patient are usually 
unfavorably received, and may result in the therapist's lifelong enmity. In everyday life such moves 
should not be initiated unless one is prepared to carry them through ruthlessly and take the 
consequences. For example, spuming a relative who "Can Get It For You Wholesale" may cause 
serious domestic complications. 


Thesis: Nobody ever does what I tell them. Ann: Alleviation of guilt. Roles: Helper, Client. 

Dynamics: Masochism. 

Examples: (1) Children learning, parent intervenes. (2) Social worker and client. 

Social Paradigm: Parent-Child. Child: "What do I do now?" Parent: "Here's what you do." 

Psychological Paradigm: Parent-Child. Parent: "See how adequate I am." Child: "I'll make you feel 

inadequate." Moves: (1) Instructions requested — Instructions given. (2) Procedure bungled — 

reproof, (3) Demonstration that procedures are faulty — Implicit apology. 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — martyrdom. (2) External Psychological — avoids facing 

inadequacies. (3) Internal Social — "PTA," Projective Type; ingratitude. (4) External Social — 

"Psychiatry," Projective Type. (5) Biological — slapping from client, stroking from supervisors. (6) 

Existential — All people are ungrateful. 


Thesis. The thesis of this game is best stated by Henry Miller in The Colossus of Maroussi: "The 
event must have taken place during the year when I was looking for a job without the slightest 
intention of taking one. It reminded me that, desperate as I thought myself to be, I bad not even 
bothered to look through the columns of the want ads." This game is one of the complements of 
"I'm Only Trying to Help You" (ITHY) as it is played by social workers who earn their living by it, 
"Indigence" is played just as professionally by the client who earns his living in this manner. The 
writer's own experience with "Indigence" is limited, but the following account by one of his most 
accomplished students illustrates the nature of this game and its place in our society. 


Miss Black was a social worker in a welfare agency whose avowed purpose, for which it received a 
government subsidy, was the economic rehabilitation of indigents — which in effect meant getting 
them to find and retain gainful employment. The clients of this agency were continually making 
progress," according to official reports, but very few of them were actually "rehabilitated." This 
was understandable, it was claimed, because most of them had been welfare clients for several 
years, going from agency to agency and sometimes being involved with five or s& agencies at a 
time, so that it was evident that they were "difficult cases." 

Miss Black, from her training in game analysis, soon realized that the staff of her agency was 
playing a consistent game of ITHY, and wondered how the clients were responding to this. In order 
to check, she asked her own clients from week to week how many job opportunities they had 
actually investigated. She was interested to discover that although they were theoretically supposed 
to be looking assiduously for work from day to day, actually they devoted very little effort to this, 
and sometimes the token efforts they did make had an ironic quality. For example, one man said 
that he answered at least one advertisement a day looking for work. "What kind of work?" she 
inquired. He said he wanted to go into sales work. "Is that the only kind of ad you answer?" she 
asked. He- said that it was, but it was too bad that- he was a stutterer, as that held him back from 
his chosen career. About this time it came to the attention of her supervisor that she was asking 
these questions, and she was reprimanded for putting "undue pressure" on her clients. 
Miss Black decided nevertheless to go ahead and rehabilitate some of them. She selected those who 
were able-bodied and did not seem to have a valid reason to continue to receive welfare funds. 
With this selected group, she talked over the games ITHY and "Indigence." When they were 
willing to concede the point, she said that unless they found jobs she was going to cut them off 
from welfare funds and refer them to a different kind of agency. Several of them almost 
immediately found employment, some for the first time in years. But they were indignant at her 
attitude, and some of them wrote letters to her supervisor complaining about it. The supervisor 
called her in and reprimanded her even more severely, on the ground that although her former 
clients were working, they were not "really rehabilitated." The supervisor indicated that there was 
some question whether they would retain Miss Black in the agency. Miss Black, as much as she 
dared without further jeopardizing her position, tactfully tried to elicit what would constitute "really 
rehabilitated" in the agency's opinion. This was not clarified. She was only told that she was 
"putting undue pressure" on people, and the fact that they were supporting their families for the first 
time in years was in no way to her credit. 

Because she needed her job and was now in danger of losing it, some of her friends tried to help. 
The respected head of a psychiatric clinic wrote to the supervisor, stating that he had heard Miss 
Black had done some particularly effective work with welfare clients, and asking whether she 
might discuss her findings at a staff conference at his clinic. The supervisor refused permission. 
In this case the rules of "Indigence" were set up by the agency to complement the local rules of 
ITHY. There was a tacit agreement between the worker and the client which read as follows: 
W. "I'll try to help you (providing you don't get better)." B. "I'll look for employment (providing I 
don't have to find any)." 

If a client broke the agreement by getting better, the agency lost a client, and the client lost his 
welfare benefits, and both felt penalized. If a worker like Miss Black broke the agreement by 
making the client actually find work, the agency was penalized by the client's complaints, which 
might come to the attention of higher authorities, while again the client lost his welfare benefits. 
As long as both obeyed the implicit rules, both got what they wanted. The client received his 
benefits and soon learned what the agency wanted in return: an opportunity to "reach out" (as part 
of ITHY) plus "clinical material" (to present at "client-centered" staff conferences). 
The client was glad to comply with these demands, which gave him as much pleasure as it did the 
agency. Thus they got along well together, and neither felt any desire to terminate such a satisfying 
relationship. Miss Black, in effect, "reached in" instead of "reaching out," and proposed a 
"community-centered" staff conference instead of a "client-centered" one; and this disturbed all the 


others concerned in spite of the fact that she was thus only complying with the stated intent of the 

Two things should be noted here. First, "Indigence" as a game rather than a condition due to 
physical, mental, or economic disability, is played by only a limited percentage of welfare clients. 
Second, it will only be supported by social workers who are trained to play ITHY. It will not be 
well-tolerated by other workers. 

Allied games are "Veteran" and "Clinic." "Veteran" displays the same symbiotic relationship, this 
time between the Veterans Administration, allied organizations, and a certain number of 
"professional veterans" who share die legitimate privileges of disabled ex-servicemen. "Clinic" is 
played by a certain percentage of those who attend the out-patient departments of large hospitals. 
Unlike those who play "Indigent" or "Veteran," patients who -play "Clinic" do not receive financial 
remuneration, but get other advantages. They serve a useful social purpose, since they are willing to 
cooperate in the training of medical personnel and in studies of disease processes. From this they 
may get a legitimate Adult satisfaction not available to players of "Indigence" and "Veteran." 
Antithesis. Antithesis, if indicated, consists in withholding the benefits. Here the risk is not 
primarily from the player himself, as in most other games, but from this game being culturally 
syntonic and fostered by the complementary ITHY players. The threat comes from professional 
colleagues and the aroused public, government agencies and protective unions. The complaints 
which follow an exhibition of anti-"Indigence" may lead to a loud outcry of "Yes, Yes, How About 
That?" which may be regarded as a healthy, constructive operation or pastime, even if it 
occasionally discourages candidness. In fact, the whole American political system of democratic 
freedoms is based on a license (not available under many other forms of government) to ask that 
question. Without such a license, humanitarian social progress becomes seriously impeded. 


Thesis. The prototype peasant is the arthritic Bulgarian villager who sells her only cow to raise 
money to go to the university clinic in Sofia. There the professor examines her and finds her case 
so interesting that he presents her in a clinical demonstration to the medical students. He outlines 
not only the pathology, symptoms and diagnosis, but also the treatment. This procedure fills Her 
with awe. Before she leaves, the professor gives her a prescription and explains the treatment in 
more detail. She is overcome with admiration for his learning and says the Bulgarian equivalent of, 
"Gee, you're wonderful, Professor!" However, she never has the prescription filled. First, there is 
no apothecary in her village; second, even if there were, she would never let such a valuable piece 
of paper out of her hands. Nor does she have the facilities for carrying out the rest of the treatment, 
such as diet, hydrotherapy and so on. She lives on, crippled as before, but happy now because she 
can tell everyone about the wonderful treatment prescribed for her by the great professor in Sofia, 
to whom she expresses her gratitude every night in her prayers. 

Years later, the Professor, in an unhappy frame of mind, happens to pass through the village on his 
way to see a wealthy but demanding patient. He remembers the peasant when she rushes out to kiss 
his hand and remind him of the marvelous regimen he put her on so long ago. He accepts her 
homage graciously, and is particularly gratified when she tells him how much good the treatment 
has done. In fact he is so carried away that he fails to notice that she limps as badly as ever. 
Socially "Peasant" is played in an innocent and a dissembled form, both with the motto, "Gee 
you're wonderful, Mr. Murgatroyd!" (GYWM). In the innocent form, Murgatroyd is wonderful. He 
is a celebrated poet, painter, philanthropist or scientist, and naive young women frequently travel a 
long way in the hope of meeting him so that they can sit adoringly at his feet and romanticize his 
imperfections. A more sophisticated woman who sets out deliberately to have an affair or a 
marriage with such a man, whom she sincerely admires and appreciates, may be fully aware of his 
weaknesses. She may even exploit them in order to get what she wants. With these two types of 
women, the game arises from the romanticizing or exploiting of the imperfections, while the 


innocence lies in their genuine respect for his accomplishments, which they are able to evaluate 

In the dissembled form, Murgatroyd may or may not be wonderful, but he comes up against a 
woman incapable of appreciating him in the best sense, in any case; perhaps she is a high-class 
prostitute. She plays "Little Old Me" and uses GYWM as sheer flattery to attain her own ends. 
Underneath she is either bewildered by him or laughing at him. But she does not care about him; 
what she wants are the perquisites that go with him. 

Clinically "Peasant" is played in two similar forms, with the motto, "Gee you're wonderful, 
Professor!" (GYWP). In the innocent form the patient may stay well as long as she can believe in 
GYWP, which places an obligation on the therapist to be well-behaved both in public and in private 
life. In the dissembled form the patient hopes the therapist will go along with her GYWP and think: 
"You're uncommonly perceptive" (YUP). Once she has him in this position, she can make him look 
foolish and then move on to another therapist; if he cannot be so easily beguiled, he may actually 
be able to help her. 

The simplest way for the patient to win GYWP is not to get better. If she is more malicious, she 
may take more positive steps to make the therapist look foolish. One woman played GYWP with 
her psychiatrist without any alleviation of symptoms; she finally left him with many salaams and 
apologies. She then went to her revered clergyman for help and played GYWP with him. After a 
few weeks she seduced him into a game of second-degree "Rapo." She then told her neighbor 
confidentially over the back fence how disappointed she was that so fine a man as Rev. Black could, 
in a moment of weakness, make a pass at an innocent and unattractive women like herself. 
Knowing his wife, she could forgive him, of course, but nevertheless, etc. This confidence just 
slipped out inadvertently, and it was only afterward that she remembered "to her horror" that the 
neighbor was an elder in the church. With her psychiatrist she won by not getting better; with her 
clergyman she won by seducing him, although she was reluctant to admit it. But a second 
psychiatrist introduced her to a therapy group where she could not maneuver as she had before. 
Then, with no GYWP and YUP to fill in her therapeutic time, she began to examine her behavior 
more closely and with the help of the group was able to give up both her games — GYWP and 

Antithesis. The therapist must first decide whether the game is played innocently and hence should 
be allowed to continue for the benefit of the patient until her Adult is sufficiently well-established 
to risk countermeasures. If it is not innocent, the countermeasures may be taken at the first 
appropriate opportunity, after the patient has been sufficiently well prepared so that she will be able 
to understand what happens. The therapist then steadfastly refuses to give advice, and when the 
patient begins to protest, he makes it clear that this is not merely "Poker-Faced Psychiatry" but a 
well-thought-out policy. In due time his refusals may either enrage the patient or precipitate acute 
anxiety symptoms. The next step depends on the malignancy of the patient's condition. If she is too 
upset, her acute reactions should be dealt with by appropriate psychiatric or analytic procedures to 
re-establish the therapeutic situation. The first goal, in the dissembled form, is to split off the Adult 
from the hypocritical Child so that the game can be analyzed. 

In social situations, intimate entanglements with innocent GYWM players should be avoided, as 
any intelligent actor's agent will impress upon his clients. On the other hand, women who play 
dissembled GYWM are sometimes interesting and intelligent if they can be de-GYWMed, and may 
turn out to be quite a delightful addition to the family social circle. 


Thesis. Psychiatry as a procedure must be distinguished from "Psychiatry" as a game. According to 
the available evidence, presented in proper clinical form in scientific publications, the following 
approaches, among others, are of value in treating psychiatric conditions: shock therapy, hypnosis, 
drugs, psychoanalysis, orthopsychiatry and group therapy. There are others which are less 
commonly used and will not be discussed here. Any of these can be used in the game of 


"Psychiatry," which is based on the position "I am a healer," supported by a diploma: "It says here I 
am a healer." It will be noted that in any case this is a constructive, benevolent position, and that 
people who play "Psychiatry" can do a great deal of good, providing they are professionally trained. 
It is likely, however, that there will be some gain in therapeutic results if therapeutic ardor is 
moderated. The antithesis was best expressed long ago by Ambroise Par£, who said in effect: "I 
treat them, but God cures them." Every medical student learns about this dictum, along with others 
such as primium non nocere, and phrases such as vis medicatrix naturae. Nonmedical therapists, 
however, are not likely to be exposed -to these ancient cautions. The position "I am a healer 
because it says here that I am a healer" is likely to be an impairment, and may be replaced to 
advantage with something like: "I will apply what therapeutic procedures I have learned in the hope 
that they will be of some benefit." This avoids the possibility of games based on: "Since I am a 
healer, if you don't get better it's your fault" (e.g., "I'm Only Trying To Help You" or "Since you're 
a healer, I'll get better for you" (e.g., "Peasant"). All of this, of course, is known in principle to 
every conscientious therapist. Certainly every therapist who has ever presented a case at a reputable 
clinic has been made aware of it. Conversely, a good clinic may be defined as one which makes its 
therapists aware of these things. 

On the other side, the game of "Psychiatry" is more apt to crop up with patients who have 
previously been treated by less competent therapists. A few patients, for example, carefully pick 
weak psychoanalysts, moving from one to another, demonstrating that they cannot be cured and 
meanwhile learning to play a sharper and sharper game of "Psychiatry"; eventually it becomes 
difficult for even a first-rate clinician to separate the wheat from the chaff. The duplex transaction 
on the patient's side is: 
Adult: "I am coming to be cured." 

Child: "You will never cure me, but you will teach me to be a better neurotic (play a better game of 

"Mental Health" is played similarly; here the Adult statement is, "Everything will get better if I 
apply the principles of mental health which I have read and heard about." One patient learned to 
play "Psychiatry" from one therapist, "Mental Health" from another, and then as a result of still 
another effort began to play a pretty good game of "Transactional Analysis." When this was frankly 
discussed with her, she agreed to stop playing "Mental Health," but requested that she be allowed to 
continue to play "Psychiatry" because it made her feel comfortable. The transactional psychiatrist 
agreed. She continued, therefore, for several months to recite her dreams and her interpretations of 
them at weekly intervals. Finally, partly out of plain gratitude, perhaps, she decided that it might be 
interesting to find out what was really the matter with her. She became seriously interested in 
transactional analysis, with good results. 

A variant of "Psychiatry" is "Archaeology" (title by courtesy of Dr. Norman Reider of San 
Francisco), in which the patient takes the position that if she can only find out who had the button, 
so to speak, everything will suddenly be all right. This results in a continual rumination over 
childhood happenings. Sometimes the therapist may he beguiled into a game of "Critique," in 
which the patient describes her feelings in various situations and the therapist tells her what is 
wrong with them. "Self-Expression," which is a common game in some therapy groups, is based on 
the dogma "Feelings are Good." A patient who uses vulgar expletives, for example, may be 
applauded or at least implicitly lauded. A sophisticated group, however, will soon spot this as a 

Some members of therapy groups become quite adept at picking out games of "Psychiatry," and 
will soon let a new patient know if they think he is playing "Psychiatry" or "Transactional 
Analysis" instead of using group procedures to obtain legitimate insight. A woman who transferred 
from a Self-Expression group in one city to a more sophisticated group in another city told a story 
about an incestuous relationship in her childhood. Instead of the awe which she had come to expect 
whenever she told this oft-repeated tale, she was greeted with indifference, whereupon she became 
enraged. She was astonished to discover that the new group was more interested in her transactional 
anger than in her historical incest, and in irate tones she hurled what apparently in her mind was the 


ultimate insult: she accused them of not being Freudian. Freud, himself, of course, took 
psychoanalysis more seriously, and avoided making a game of it by saying that he himself was not 
a Freudian. 

Recently unmasked is a new variant of "Psychiatry" called "Tell Me This," somewhat similar to the 
party pastime "Twenty Questions." White relates a dream or an incident, and the other members, 
often including die therapist, then attempt to interpret it by asking pertinent questions. As long as 
White answers the questions, each member continues his inquiries until he finds a question White 
cannot answer. Then Black sits back with a knowing look which says: "Aha! If you could answer 
that one, you would certainly get better, so I have done my part." (This is a distant relative of "Why 
Don't You — Yes But"). Some therapy groups are based almost entirely on this game, and may go 
on for years with only minimal change or progress. "Tell Me This" allows much latitude to White 
(the patient) who, for example, can play along with it by feeling ineffectual; or he can counter it by 
answering all the questions offered, in which case the anger and dismay of the other players soon 
becomes manifest, since he is throwing back at them, "I've answered all your questions and you 
haven't cured me, so what does that make you?" "Tell Me This" is also played in schoolrooms, 
where the pupils know that the "right" answer to an open-ended question asked by a certain type of 
teacher is not to be found by processing the factual data, but by guessing or outguessing which of 
several possible answers will make the teacher happy. A pedantic variant occurs in teaching ancient 
Greek; the teacher always has the upper hand over the pupil, and can make him look stupid and 
prove it in print by pointing to some obscure feature of the text. This is also often played in 
teaching Hebrew. 


Thesis. In its milder form, the thesis of "Stupid" is, "I laugh with you at my own clumsiness and 
stupidity." Seriously disturbed people, however, may play it in a sullen way which says, "I am 
stupid, that's the way I am, so do me something." Both forms are played from a depressive position. 
"Stupid" must be distinguished from "Schlemiel," where the position is more aggressive, and the 
clumsiness is a bid for forgiveness. It must also be distinguished from "Clown," which is not a 
game but a pastime which reinforces the position "I am cute and harmless." The critical transaction 
in "Stupid" is for White to make Black call him stupid or respond as though he were stupid. Hence 
White acts like a Schlemiel but does not ask for forgiveness; in fact forgiveness makes him uneasy, 
because it threatens his position. Or he behaves clownishly, but with no implication that he is 
kidding; he wants his behavior to be taken seriously, as evidence of real stupidity. There is 
considerable external gain, since the less White learns, the more effectively he can play. Hence at 
school he need not study, and at work he need not go out of his way to learn anything that might 
lead to advancement. He has known from an early age that everyone will be satisfied with him as 
long as he is stupid, despite any expressions to the contrary. People are surprised when in time of 
stress, if he decides to come through, it turns out that he is not stupid at all — any more than is the 
"stupid" younger son in the fairy tale. 

Antithesis. The antithesis of the milder form is simple. By not playing, by not laughing at the 
clumsiness or railing at the stupidity, the anti-"Stupid" player will make a friend for life. One of the 
subtleties is that this game is often played by cyclothymic or manic-depressive personalities. When 
such people are euphoric, it seems as though they really want their associates to join in their 
laughter at themselves. It is often hard not to, for they give the impression that they will resent an 
abstainer — which in a way they do, since he threatens their position and spoils the game. But when 
they are depressed, and their resentment against those who laughed with or at them comes into the 
open, the abstainer knows that he has acted correctly. He may be the only one the patient is willing 
to have in the room or talk to when he is withdrawn, and all the former "friends" who enjoyed the 
game are now treated as enemies. 

It is no use telling White that he is not really stupid. He may actually be of quite limited 
intelligence and well aware of it, which is how the game got started in the first place. There may be 


special areas, however, in which he is superior: often psychological insight is one. It does no harm 
to show whatever respect is deserved for such aptitudes, but this is different from clumsy attempts 
at "reassurance." The latter may give him the bitter satisfaction of realizing that other people are 
even more stupid than he, but this is small consolation. Such "reassurance" is certainly not the most 
intelligent therapeutic procedure; usually it is a move in a game of "I'm Only Trying to Help You." 
The antithesis of "Stupid" is not to substitute another game, but simply to refrain from playing 

The antithesis of the sullen form is a more complicated problem, because the sullen player is trying 
to provoke not laughter or derision but helplessness or exasperation, which he is well equipped to 
handle in accordance with his challenge "So do me something." Thus he wins either way. If Black 
does nothing, it is because he feels helpless, and if he does something, it is because he is 
exasperated. Hence these people are prone also to play "Why Don't You — Yes But," from which 
they can get the same satisfactions in milder form. There is no easy solution in this case, nor is 
there likely to be one forthcoming until the psychodynamics of this game are more clearly 


Thesis. The most dramatic form of "Wooden Leg" is "The Plea of Insanity." This may be translated 
into transactional terms as follows: "What do you expect of someone as emotionally disturbed as I 
am — that I would refrain from killing people?" To which the jury is asked to reply: "Certainly not, 
we would hardly impose that restriction on you!" "The Plea of Insanity," played as a legal game, is 
acceptable to American culture and is different from the almost universally respected principle that 
an individual may be suffering from a psychosis so profound that no reasonable person would 
expect him to be responsible for his actions. In Japan drunkenness, and in Russia war-time military 
service, are accepted as excuses for evading responsibility for all kinds of outrageous behavior 
(according to this writer's information). 

The thesis of "Wooden Leg" is, "What do you expect of a man with a wooden leg?" Put that way, 
of course, no one would expect anything of a man with a wooden leg except that he should steer his 
own wheel chair. On the other hand, during World War II there was a man with a wooden leg who 
used to give demonstrations of jitterbug dancing, and very competent jitterbug dancing, at Army 
Hospital amputation centers. There are blind men who practice law and hold political offices (one 
such is currently mayor of the writer's home town), deaf men who practice psychiatry and handless 
men who can use a typewriter. 

As long as someone with a real, exaggerated or even imaginary disability is content with his lot, 
perhaps no one should interfere. But the moment he presents himself for psychiatric treatment, the 
question arises if he is using his life to his own best advantage, and if he can rise above his 
disability. In this country the therapist will be working in opposition to a large mass of educated 
public opinion. Even the close relatives of the patient who complained most loudly about the 
inconveniences caused by his infirmity, may eventually rum on the therapist if the patient makes 
definitive progress. This is readily understandable to a game analyst, but it makes his task no less 
difficult. All the people who were playing "I'm Only Trying to Help You" are threatened by the 
impending disruption of the game if the patient shows signs of striking out on his own, and 
sometimes they use almost incredible measures to terminate the treatment. 
Both sides are illustrated by the case of the stuttering client of Miss Black's, mentioned in the 
discussion of the game "Indigence." This man played a classical form of "Wooden Leg." He was 
unable to find employment, which he correctly attributed to the fact that he was a stutterer, since 
the only career that interested him, he said, was that of salesman. As a free citizen he had a right to 
seek employment in whatever field he chose, but as a stutterer, his choice raised some question as 
to the purity of his motives. The reaction of the helpful agency when Miss Black attempted to break 
up this game was very unfavorable to her. 


"Wooden Leg" is especially pernicious in clinical practice, because the patient may find a therapist 
who plays the same game with the same plea, so that progress is impossible. This is relatively easy 
to arrange in the case of the "Ideological Plea," "What do you expect of a man who lives in a 
society like ours?" One patient combined this with the "Psychosomatic Plea," "What do you expect 
of a man with psychosomatic symptoms?" He found a succession of therapists who would accept 
one plea but not the other, so that none of them either made him feel comfortable in his current 
position by accepting both pleas, or budged him from it by rejecting both. Thus he proved that 
psychiatry couldn't help people. 

Some of the pleas which patients use to excuse symptomatic behavior are colds, head injuries, 
situational stress, the stress of modem living, American culture and the economic system. A literate 
player has no difficulty in finding authorities to support him. "I drink because I'm Irish." "This 
wouldn't happen if I lived in Russia or Tahiti." The fact is that patients in mental hospitals in Russia 
and Tahiti are very similar to those in American state hospitals. 1 Special pleas of "If It Weren't For 
Them" or "They Let Me Down" should always be evaluated very carefully in clinical practice — and 
also in social research projects. 

Slightly more sophisticated are such pleas as: What do you expect of a man who (a) comes from a 
broken home (b) is neurotic (c) is in analysis or (d) is suffering from a disease known as alcoholism? 
These are topped by, "If I stop doing this I won't be able to analyze it, and then I'll never get better." 
The obverse of "Wooden Leg" is "Rickshaw," with the thesis, "If they only had (rickshaws) 
(duckbill platypuses) (girls who spoke ancient Egyptian) around this town, I never would have got 
into this mess." 

Antithesis. Anti-"Wooden Leg" is not difficult if the therapist can distinguish clearly between his 
own Parent and Adult, and if the therapeutic aim is explicitly understood 
by both parties. 

On the Parental side, he can be either a "good" Parent or a "harsh" one. As a "good" Parent he can 
accept the patient's plea, especially if it fits in with his own viewpoints, perhaps with the 
rationalization that people are not responsible for their actions until they have completed their 
therapy. As a "harsh" Parent he can reject the plea and engage in a contest of wills with the patient. 
Both of these attitudes are already Familiar to the "Wooden Leg" player, and he knows how to 
extract the maximum satisfactions from each of them. 

As an Adult, the therapist declines both of these opportunities. When the patient asks, "What do 
you expect of a neurotic?" (or whatever plea he is using at the moment) the reply is, "I don't expect 
anything. The question is, what do you expect of yourself?" The only demand he makes is that the 
patient give a serious answer to this question, and the only concession he makes is to allow the 
patient a reasonable length of time to answer it: anywhere from six weeks to six months, depending 
on the relationship between them and the patient's previous preparation. 


1. Berne, E. "The Cultural Problem: Psychopathology in Tahiti." American Journal of Psychiatry. 



Good Games 

THE psychiatrist, who is in the best and perhaps the only position to study games adequately, 
unfortunately deals almost entirely with people whose games have led them into difficulties. This 
means that die games which are offered for clinical investigation are all in some sense "bad" ones. 
And since by definition games are based on ulterior transactions, they must all have some element 
of exploitation. For these two reasons, practical on the one hand and theoretical on the other, the 
search for "good" games becomes a difficult quest. A "good" game might be described as one 
whose social contribution outweighs the complexity of its motivations, particularly if the player has 
come to terms with those motivations without futility or cynicism. That is, a "good" game would be 
one which contributes both to the well-being of the other players and to the unfolding of the one 
who is "it." Since even under the best forms of social action and organization a large proportion of 
time has to be spent in playing games, the search for "good" ones must be assiduously pursued. 
Several examples are offered here, but they are admittedly deficient in both number and quality. 
They include "Busman's Holiday," "Cavalier," "Happy to Help," "Homely Sage" and "They'll Be 
Glad They Knew Me." 


Thesis. Strictly speaking, this is a pastime rather than a game, and evidently a constructive one for 
all concerned. An American mail carrier goes to Tokyo to help a Japanese postman on his rounds, 
or an American ear-nose-and-throat specialist who spends his holiday working in a Haitian hospital, 
will very likely feel just as refreshed and have just as good stories to tell as if he had gone hunting 
in Africa or spent the time driving through transcontinental highway traffic. The Peace Corps has 
now given official sanction to Busman's Holiday. 

"Busman's Holiday" becomes a game, however, if the work is secondary to some ulterior motive 
and is undertaken merely as a show in order to accomplish something else. Even under those 
circumstances, however, it still keeps its constructive quality and is one of the more commendable 
covers for other activities (which may also be constructive). 


Thesis. This is a game played by men who are not under sexual pressure — occasionally by younger 
men who have a satisfactory marriage or liaison, more often by older men who are gracefully 
resigned to monogamy or celibacy- Upon encountering a suitable female subject, White takes every 
opportunity to remark upon her good qualities, never transgressing the limits appropriate to her 
station in life, the immediate social situation and the requirements of good taste. But within those 
limits he allows full play to his creativity, enthusiasm and originality. The object is not to seduce 
but to exhibit his virtuosity in the art of effective compliment. The internal social advantage lies in 
the pleasure given to the woman by this innocent artistry, and by her responsive appreciation of 
White's skill. In suitable cases, where both are aware of the nature of the game, it may be stretched 
with increasing delight on both sides, to the point of extravagance. A man of the world, of course, 
will know when to stop, and will not continue beyond the point at which he ceases to amuse (out of 
consideration for her) or where the quality of his offerings begins to deteriorate (out of 
consideration for his own pride of craftsmanship). "Cavalier" is played for its external social 
advantages in the case of poets, who are as much, or more, interested in the appreciation of 
qualified critics and the public at large as they are in the response of the lady who inspired them. 
The Europeans in romance, and the British in poetry, seem always to have been more adept at this 
game than the Americans. In our country it has fallen largely into the hands of the Fruit Stand 
school of poetry: your eyes are like avocados, your lips like cucumbers, etc. "Cavalier," Fruit Stand 


Type, can hardly compare in elegance with the productions of Herrick and Lovelace, or even with 
the cynical but imaginative works of Rochester, Roscommon and 

Antithesis. It takes some sophistication for the woman to play her part well, and a great deal of 
sulkiness or stupidity for her to refuse to play it at all. The proper complement is a variant of "Gee 
You're Wonderful Mr. Murgatroyd" (GYWM): namely, "I Admire Your Productions, Mr. M." If 
the woman is mechanical or unperceptive, she may respond with plain GYWM, but that misses the 
point: what White is offering for appreciation is not himself, but his poetry. The brutal antithesis 
from a sulky woman is to play Second-Degree "Rapo" ("Buzz Off, Buster"). Third-Degree "Rapo," 
which could conceivably occur, would of course be an unspeakably vile response under the 
circumstances. If the woman is merely stupid, she will play First-Degree "Rapo," taking the 
compliments to feed her vanity and neglecting to appreciate Whites creative efforts and abilities. In 
general, the game is spoiled if the woman treats it as an attempt at seduction rather than as a literary 

Relatives. "Cavalier" being a game, it must be distinguished from the operations and procedures 
carried on during a straightforward courtship, which are simple transactions without ulterior motive. 
The female counterpart of Cavalier" may be conveniently called "Blarney," since it is often played 
by gallant Irish ladies in their sunset years. 


Aim: Mutual admiration. 

Roles: Poet, Appreciative subject. 

Social Paradigm: Adult-Adult. 

Adult (male): "See how good I can make you feel." 

Adult (female): "My, but you make me feel good." Psychological Paradigm: 

Child (male): "See what phrases I can create." Child (female): "My, but you're creative." 

Advantages: (1) Internal Psychological — creativity and reassurance of attractiveness. (2) External 

Psychological — avoids rejection for unnecessary sexual advances. (3) Internal Social — "Cavalier." 

(4) External Social — these may be resigned. (5) Biological — mutual stroking. (6) Existential — I 

can live gracefully. 


Thesis. White is consistently helpful to other people, with some ulterior motive. He may be doing 
penance For past wickedness, covering up for present wickedness, making friends in order to 
exploit them later or seeking prestige. But whoever questions his motives must also give him credit 
for his actions. After all, people can cover up for past wickedness by becoming more wicked, 
exploit people by fear rather than generosity and seek prestige for evil ways instead of good ones. 
Some philanthropists are more interested in competition than in benevolence: "I gave more money 
(works of art, acres of land) than you did." Again, if their motives are questioned, they must 
nevertheless be given credit for competing in a constructive way, since there are so many people 
who compete destructively. Most people (or peoples) who play "Happy to Help" have both friends 
and enemies, both perhaps justified in their feelings. Their enemies attack their motives and 
minimize their actions, while their friends are grateful for their actions and minimize their motives. 
Therefore so-called "objective" discussions of this game are practically nonexistent. People who 
claim to be neutral soon show which side they are neutral on. 

This game, as an exploitative maneuver, is the basis for a large proportion of "public relations" in 
America. But the customers are glad to become involved, and it is perhaps the most pleasant and 
constructive of the commercial games. In another connection, one of its most reprehensible forms is 
a three-handed family game in which the mother and father compete for the affection of their 
offspring. But even here, it should be noted, the choice of "Happy to Help" removes some of the 


discredit, since there are so many unpleasant ways of competing available — for example, "Mommy 
is sicker than daddy," or "Why do you love him more than you love me?" 


Thesis. This is properly a script rather than a game, but it has gamelike aspects. A well-educated 
and sophisticated man learns as much as he can about all sorts of things besides his own business. 
When he reaches retirement age, he moves from the big city where he held a responsible position to 
a small town. There it soon becomes known that people can go to him with their problems of 
whatever kind, from a knock in the engine to a senile relative, and that he will help them himself if 
he is competent or else refer them to qualified experts. Thus he soon finds his place in his new 
environment as a "Homely Sage," making no pretenses, hut always willing to listen. In its best form 
it is played by people who have taken the trouble to go to a psychiatrist to examine their motives, 
and to learn what errors to avoid before setting themselves up in this role. 


Thesis. This is a more worthy variant of "I'll Show Them." There are two forms of "I'll Show 
Them." In the destructive form White "shows them" by inflicting damage on them. Thui he may 
maneuver himself into a superior position, not for the prestige or the material rewards hut because 
it gives him power to exercise his spite. In the constructive form White works hard and exerts every 
effort to gain prestige, not for the sake of craftsmanship or legitimate accomplishment (although 
those may play a secondary role), nor to inflict direct damage on his enemies, but so that they will 
be eaten with envy and with regret for not having treated him better. 

In "They'll Be Glad They Knew Me," White is working not against but for the interests of his 
former associates. He wants to show them that they were justified in treating him with friendliness 
and respect and to demonstrate to them, for their own gratification, that their judgment was sound. 
In order for him to have a secure win in this game, his means as well as his ends must be honorable, 
and that is its superiority over "I'll Show Them." Both "I'll Show Them" and "They'll Be Glad" can 
be merely secondary advantages of success, rather than games. They become games when White is 
more interested in the effects on his enemies or friends than he is in the success itself. 


PART III Beyond Games 

The Significance of Games 

1. GAMES are passed on from generation to generation. The favored game of any individual can be 
traced back to his parents and grandparents, and forward to his children; they in turn, unless there is 
a successful intervention, will teach them to his grandchildren. Thus game analysis takes place in a 
grand historical matrix, demonstrably extending back as far as one hundred years and reliably 
projected into the future for at least fifty years. Breaking this chain which involves five or more 
generations may have geometrically progressive effects. There are many living individuals who 
have more than 200 descendants. Games may be diluted or altered from one generation to another, 
hut there seems to be a strong tendency to inbreed with people who play a game of the same family, 
if not of the same genus. That is the historical significance of games. 

2. "Raising" children is primarily a matter of teaching them what games to play. Different cultures 
and different social classes favor different types of games, and various tribes and families favor 
different variations of these. That is the cultural significance of games. 

3. Games are sandwiched, as it were, between pastimes and intimacy. Pastimes grow boring with 
repetition, as do promotional cocktail parties. Intimacy requires stringent circumspection, and is 
discriminated against by Parent, Adult and Child. Society frowns upon candidness, except in 
privacy; good sense knows that it can always be abused; and the Child fears it because of the 
unmasking which it involves. Hence in order to get away from the ennui of pastimes without 
exposing themselves to the dangers of intimacy, most people compromise for games when they are 
available, and these fill the major part of the more interesting hours of social intercourse. That is 
the social significance of games. 

4. People pick as friends, associates and intimates other people who play the same games. Hence 
"everybody who is anybody" in a given social circle (aristocracy, juvenile gang, social club, college 
campus, etc.) behaves in a way which may seem quite foreign to members of a different social 
circle. Conversely, any member of a social circle who changes his games will tend to be extruded, 
but he will find himself welcome at some other social circle. That is the personal significance of 


The reader should now be in a position to appreciate the basic difference between mathematical and 
transactional game analysis. Mathematical game analysis postulates players who are completely 
rational. Transactional game analysis deals with games which are un-rational, or even irrational, 
and hence more real. 

The Players 

MANY games are played most intensely by disturbed people; generally speaking, the more 
disturbed they are, the harder they play- Curiously enough, however, some schizophrenics seem to 
refuse to play games, and demand candid-ness from the beginning. In everyday life games are 
played with the greatest conviction by two classes of individuals: the Sulks and the Jerks or Squares. 
The Sulk is a man who is angry at his mother. On investigation it emerges that he has been angry at 
her since early childhood. He often has good "Child" reasons for his anger: she may have 
"deserted" him during a critical period in his boyhood by getting sick and going to the hospital, or 
she may have given birth to too many siblings. Sometimes the desertion is more deliberate; she 
may have farmed him out in order to remarry. In any case, he has been sulking ever since. He does 
not like women, although he may be a Don Juan. Since sulking is deliberate at' its inception, the 


decision to sulk can be reversed at any period of life, just as it can be during childhood when it 
comes time for dinner. The requirements for reversing the decision are the same for the grown-up 
Sulk as for the little boy. He must be able to save face, and he must be offered something 
worthwhile in exchange for the privilege of sulking. Sometimes a game of "Psychiatry" which 
might otherwise last several years can be aborted by reversing a decision to sulk. This requires 
careful preparation of the patient and proper timing and approach. Clumsiness or bullying on the 
part of the therapist will have no better result than it does with a sulky little boy; in the long run, the 
patient will pay the therapist back for his mishandling, just as the little boy will eventually repay 
clumsy parents. 

With female Sulks the situation is the same, mutatis mutandis, if they are angry at father. Their 
"Wooden Leg" ("What do you expect of a woman who had a Father like that/') must be handled 
with even more diplomacy by a male therapist. Otherwise he risks being thrown into the 
wastebasket of "men who are like father." 

There is a bit of Jerk in everyone, but the object of game analysis is to keep it at a minimum. A Jerk 
is someone who is overly sensitive to Parental influences. Hence his Adult data processing and his 
Child's spontaneity are likely to be interfered with at critical moments, resulting in inappropriate or 
clumsy behavior. In extreme cases the Jerk merges with the Toady, the Show-off, and the Cling. 
The Jerk is not to be confused with the bewildered schizophrenic, who has no functioning Parent 
and very little functioning Adult, so that he has to cope with the world in the ego state of a 
confused Child. It is interesting that in common usage "jerk" is an epithet applied to men only, or in 
rare cases to masculine women. A Prig is even more of a Square than a Jerk; Prig is a word usually 
reserved for women, but occasionally it is said of men of somewhat feminine tendencies. 

A Paradigm 

CONSIDER the following exchange between a patient (P) and a therapist (T): 

P. "I have a new project — being on time." 

T. "I'll try to cooperate." 

P. "I don't care about you. I'm doing it for myself. . , . Guess what grade I got on my history test!" 

T. "B+." 

P. "How did you know?" 

T. "Because you're afraid to get an A." 

P. "Yes, I had an A, and I went over my paper and crossed out three correct answers and put in 

three wrong ones." 

T. "I like this conversation. It's Jerk-free." 

P. "You know, last night I was thinking how much progress I've made. I figured I was only 17% 

Jerk now." 

T. "Well, so far this morning, it's zero, so you're entitled to 34% discount on the next round." 

P. "It all began six months ago, that time I was looking at my coffeepot, and for the first time I 

really saw it. And you know how it is now, how I hear the birds sing, and I look at people and 

they're really there as people, and best of all, I'm really there. And I'm not only there, but right now 

I'm here. The other day I was standing in the art gallery looking at a picture, and a man came up 

and said, 'Gauguin is very nice, isn't he?' So I said: T like you too'. So we went out and had a drink 

and he's a very nice guy." 

This is presented as a Jerk-free, game-free conversation between two autonomous Adults, with die 

following annotations. 

"I have a new project — being on time." This announcement was made after the fact. The patient 

was nearly always late. This time she wasn't. If punctuality had been a resolution, an act of "will 

power," an imposition of the Parent on the Child, made only to be broken, it would have been 

announced before the fact: "This is the last time I'll be late." That would have been an attempt to set 


up a game. Her announcement was not. It was an Adult decision, a project, not a resolution. The 

patient continued to be punctual. 

"I'll try to cooperate." This was not a "supportive" statement, nor the first move in a new game of 

"I'm Only Trying to Help You." The patient's hour came after the therapist's coffee break. Since she 

was habitually late, he had fallen into the habit of taking his time and getting back late himself. 

When she made her declaration, he knew she meant it, and made his. The transaction was an Adult 

contract which both of them kept, and not a Child teasing a Parental figure who because of his 

position felt forced to be a "good daddy" and say he would cooperate. 

"I don't care about you." This emphasizes that her punctuality is a decision, and not a resolution to 

be exploited as part of a pseudo-compliant game. 

"Guess what grade I got." This is a pastime which both were aware of and felt free to indulge in. 

There was no need for him to demonstrate how alert he was by telling her it was a pastime, 

something she already knew, and there was no need for her to refrain from playing it just because it 

was called a pastime. 

"B+." The therapist reckoned that in her case this was the only possible grade, and there was no 

reason not to say so. False modesty or a fear of being wrong might have led him to pretend that he 

did not know. 

"How did you know?" This was an Adult question, not a game of "Gee You're Wonderful," and it 

deserved a pertinent answer. 

"Yes, I had an A." This was the real test. The patient did not sulk with rationalizations or pleas, but 

faced her Child squarely. 

"I like this conversation." This and the following semi-facetious remarks were expressions of 

mutual Adult respect, with perhaps a little Parent-Child pastime, which again was optional with 

both of them, and of which they were both aware. 

"For the first time I really saw it." She is now entitled to her own kind of awareness and is no 

longer obliged to see coffeepots and people the way her parents told her to. "Right now I'm here." 

She no longer lives in the future or the past, but can discuss them briefly if it serves a useful 


"I said: 'I like you too.'" She is not obliged-to waste time playing "Art Gallery" with the newcomer, 

although she could if she chose to. 

The therapist, on his part, does not feel obliged to play "Psychiatry." There were several 

opportunities to bring up questions of defense, transference and symbolic interpretation, but he was 

able to let these go by without feeling any anxiety. It did seem worthwhile, however, to ascertain 

for future reference which answers she crossed out on her examination. During the rest of the hour, 

unfortunately, the 17% of Jerk left in the patient and the 18% left in the therapist showed from time 

to time. In summary, the proceedings given constitute an activity enlightened with some pastime. 


THE attainment of autonomy is manifested by the release or recovery of three capacities: 
awareness, spontaneity and 

Awareness. Awareness means the capacity to see a coffeepot and hear the birds sing in one's own 
way, and not the way one was taught. It may be assumed on good grounds that seeing and hearing 
have a different quality for infants than for grownups, 1 and that they are more esthetic and less 
intellectual in the first' years of life. A little boy sees and hears birds with delight. Then the "good 
father" comes along and feels he should "share" the experience and help his son "develop." He says: 
"That's a jay, and this is a sparrow." The moment the little boy is concerned with which is a jay and 
which is a sparrow, he can no longer see the birds or hear them sing. He has to see and hear them 
the way his father wants him to. Father has good reasons on his side, since few people can afford to 
go through life listening to the birds sing, and the sooner the little boy starts his "education" the 


better. Maybe he will be an ornithologist when he grows up. A few people, however, can still see 
and hear in the old way. But most of the members of the human race have lost the capacity to be 
painters, poets or musicians, and are not left the option of seeing and hearing directly even if they 
can afford to; they must get it secondhand. The recovery of this ability is called here "awareness." 
Physiologically awareness is eidetic perception, allied to eidetic imagery.2 Perhaps there is also 
eidetic perception, at least in certain individuals, in the spheres of taste, smell and kinesthesia, 
giving us the artists in those fields: chefs, perfumers and dancers, whose eternal problem is to find 
audiences capable of appreciating their products. 

Awareness requires living in the here and now, and not in the elsewhere, the past or the future. A 
good illustration of possibilities, in American life, is driving to work in the morning in a hurry. The 
decisive question is: "Where is the mind when the body is here?" and there are three common cases. 

1. The man whose chief preoccupation is being on time is die one who is furthest out. With his 
body at the wheel of his car, his mind is at the door of his office, and he is oblivious to his 
immediate surroundings except insofar as they are obstacles to the moment when his soma will 
catch up with his psyche. This is the Jerk, whose chief concern is how it will look to the boss. If he 
is late, he will take pains to arrive out of breath. The compliant Child is in command, and his game 
is "Look How Hard I've Tried." While he is driving, he is almost completely lacking in autonomy, 
and as a human being he is in essence more dead than alive. It is quite possible that this is the most 
favorable condition for the development of hypertension or coronary disease. 

2. The Sulk, on the other hand, is not so much concerned with arriving on time as in collecting 
excuses for being late. Mishaps, badly timed lights and poor driving or stupidity on the part of 
others fit well into his scheme and are secretly welcomed as contributions to his rebellious Child or 
righteous Parent game of "Look What They Made Me Do." He, too, is oblivious to his surroundings 
except as they subscribe to his game, so that he is only half alive. His body is in his car, but his 
mind is out searching for blemishes and injustices. 

3. Less common is the "natural driver," the man to whom driving a car is a congenial science and 
art. As he makes his way swiftly and skillfully through the traffic, he is at one with his vehicle. He, 
too, is oblivious of his surroundings except as they offer scope for the craftsmanship which is its 
own reward, but he is very much aware of himself and the machine which he controls so well, and 
to that extent he is alive. Such driving is formally an Adult pastime from which his Child and 
Parent may also derive satisfaction. 

4. The Fourth case is the person who is aware, and who will not hurry because he is living in the 
present moment with the environment which is here: the sky and the trees as well as the feeling of 
motion. To hurry is to neglect that environment and to be conscious only of something that is still 
out of sight down the road, or of mere obstacles, or solely of oneself. A Chinese man started to get 
into a local subway train, when his Caucasian companion pointed out that they could save twenty 
minutes by taking an express, which they did. When they got off at Central Park, the Chinese man 
sat down on a bench, much to his friend's surprise. "Well," explained the former, "since we saved 
twenty minutes, we can afford to sit here that long and enjoy our surroundings." 

The aware person is alive because he knows how he feels, where he is and when it is. He knows 
that after he dies the trees will still be there, but he will not be there to look at them again, so he 
wants to see them now with as much poignancy as possible. 

Spontaneity. Spontaneity means option, the freedom to choose and express one's feelings from the 
assortment available (Parent feelings, Adult Feelings and Child feelings). It means liberation, 
liberation from the compulsion to play games and have only the feelings one was taught to have. 
Intimacy. Intimacy means the spontaneous, game-free candidness of an aware person, the liberation 
of the eidetically perceptive, uncorrupted Child in all its naivete" living in the here and now. It can 
be shown experimentally3 that eidetic perception evokes affection, and that candidness mobilizes 
positive feelings, so that there is even such a thing as "one-sided intimacy" - a phenomenon well 
known, although not by that name, to professional seducers, who are able to capture their partners 
without becoming involved themselves. This they do by encouraging the other person to look at 


them directly and to talk Freely, while the male or Female seducer makes only a well-guarded 
pretense of reciprocating. 

Because intimacy is essentially a function of the natural Child (although expressed in a matrix of 
psychological and social complications), it tends to turn out well if not disturbed by the intervention 
of games. Usually the adaptation to Parental influences is what spoils it, and most unfortunately 
this is almost a universal occurrence. But before, unless and until they are corrupted, most infants 
seem to be loving,4 and that is the essential nature of intimacy, as shown experimentally, 


1. Berne, E. "Primal Images & Primal Judgment." Psychiatric Quarterly. 29: 634-658, 1955. 

2. Jaensch, E. R. Eidetic Imagery. Harcourt, Brace & Company, New York, 1930. 

3. These experiments are still in the pilot stage at the San Francisco Social Psychiatry Seminars. 
The effective experimental use of transactional analysis requires special training and experience, 
just as the effective experimental use of chromatography or infrared spectrophotometry does. 
Distinguishing a game from a pastime is no easier than distinguishing a star from a planet. See 
Berne, E. "The Intimacy Experiment." Transactional Analysis Bulletin. 3: 113, 1964. "More About 
Intimacy." Ibid. 3: 125, 1964. 

4. Some infants are corrupted or starved very early (marasmus, some colics) and never nave a 
chance to exercise this capacity. 

The Attainment of Autonomy 

PARENTS, deliberately or unaware, teach their children from birth how to behave, drink, feel and 
perceive. Liberation from these influences is no easy matter, since they are deeply ingrained and 
are necessary during the first two or three decades of life for biological and social survival. Indeed, 
such liberation is only possible at all because the individual starts off in an autonomous state, that is, 
capable of awareness, spontaneity and intimacy, and he has some discretion as to which parts of his 
parents' teachings he will accept. At certain specific moments early in life he decides how he is 
going to adapt to diem. It is because his adaptation is in the nature of a series of decisions that it can 
be undone, since decisions are reversible under favorable circumstances. 

The attainment of autonomy, then, consists of the overthrow of all those irrelevancies discussed in 
Chapters 13, 14 and 15. And such overthrow is never final: there is a continual battle against 
sinking back into the old ways. 

First, as discussed in Chapter 13, the weight of a whole tribal or family historical tradition has to be 
lifted, as in the case of Margaret Mead's villagers in New Guineal; then the influence of the 
individual parental, social and cultural background has to be thrown off. The same must be done 
with the demands of contemporary society at large, and finally die advantages derived from one's 
immediate social circle have to be partly or wholly sacrificed. Then all the easy indulgences and 
rewards of being a Sulk or a Jerk, as described in Chapter 14, have to be given up. Following this, 
the individual must attain personal and social control, so that all the classes of behavior described 
in the Appendix, except perhaps dreams, become free choices subject only to his will. He is then 
ready for game-free relationships such as that illustrated in the paradigm in Chapter 15, At this 
point he may be able to develop his capacities for autonomy. In essence, diis whole preparation 
consists of obtaining a friendly divorce from one's parents (and from other Parental influences) so 
that they may be agreeably visited on occasion, but are no longer dominant. 


I. Mead, M. New Ways for Old. William Morrow & Company, New York, 1956. 


After Games, What? 

THE somber picture presented in Parts I and II of this book, in which human life is mainly a 
process of filling in time until the arrival of death, or Santa Claus, with very little choice, if any, of 
what kind of business one is going to transact during the long wait, is a commonplace but not the 
final answer. For certain fortunate people there is something which transcends all classifications of 
behavior, and that is awareness; something which rises above the programming of the past, and that 
is spontaneity; and something that is more rewarding than games, and that is intimacy. But all three 
of these may be frightening and even perilous to the unprepared. Perhaps they are better off as they 
are, seeking their solutions in popular techniques of social action, such as "togetherness." This may 
mean that there is no hope for the human race, but there is hope for individual members of it. 


The Classification of Behavior 

AT ANY given moment a human being is engaged in one or more of the following classes of 


CLASS i. Internally programed (archaeopsychic). Autistic behavior. 

Orders: (a) Dreams. 

(b) Fantasies. 

Families: i. Extraneous fantasies (wish fulfillment), ii. Autistic transactions, Un- 


iii. Autistic transactions, Adapted (with neopsychic programing). 

(c) Fugues. 

(d) Delusional behavior. 

(e) Involuntary actions. Families: i. Tics, 
ii. Mannerisms, iii. Parapraxes. 

(f) Others. 

CLASS ii. Probability programed (neopsycKic). Reality-tested behavior. 

Orders: (a) Activities. 

Families: i. Professions, trades, etc. ii. Sports, hobbies, etc, 

(b) Procedures. 

Families: i. Data processing, ii. Techniques. 

(c) Others. 

CLASS in. Socially programed (partly exteropsychic). Social behavior. 


Orders: (a) Rituals and ceremonies. 

(b) Pastimes. 

(c) Operations and maneuvers. 

(d) Games. 

Suborders: A. Professional games (angular transactions). B. Social games (duplex transactions). 

(e) Intimacy. 

In this scheme the social games previously discussed would be classified as follows: Class III, 
Socially programed; Order (d), Games; Suborder B, Social Games. 
Intimacy, "the end of the line," is the final classification, and is part of game-free living. 
The reader should feel free to carp (but not to gleek or fleer) at the above classification. It is 
included not because the writer is in love with it, but because it is more functional, real and 
practical than other systems now in use and can be helpful to those who like or need taxonomy.